04-11-2011

We are told by the Government and Media in the UK United Kingdom or Britain that being sick or disabled means that you are in principle a scrounger or even a benefit thief. The Government itself in the mean time is taking every penny they can get to spent on their own benefits, the parties, the travelling, the diners etc. etc. They have as PM free housing the rent paid by the people, free fringe benefits, paid for by the people. A more the generous income benefit, paid for by the people. Now a normal well thinking person would be grateful for the opportunity to be in that position and would the outmost to help the people to have a decent life.



However not so in the UK where the PM rooms off all the money he can get to pay the US for the privilege to do the dirty work for them, see the war against Libya, and the expected attacks on Iran now Syria is fallen through. As in Iraq where the excuse was WMD, or in Afghanistan the evils of the Taliban, or the indented mass killing by Libya of the Benghazi and now for Iran the probability of Iran having in the future nuclear weapons. All fantasy stories created by either Mossad or the CIA for the single purpose of killing people with an excuse. As we have seen in Iraq, and the rest the fabricated stories where in fact false. Although the three governments are keeping it up by re-launching the same stories over and over again. As the Nazi's statement said,” a lie is only a lie if found out, and if found out create another one to take the attention away from the previous lies. He, the PM will say it was all NATO's doing, but the facts remain that it was the name of NATO but the actions mainly by Britain. The same we see again in the rumours for the pre-emptive strikes against Iran it is once more the evil three, Britain, the USA and what else Israel.



They are the equivalent of a previous evil three, Hitler’s Germany, Italy and Spain. Different countries same aim, to maim, to steal and to murder. This man is so full of himself for betraying his country that he ridicules people who want the best for Britain; see the absurd and abnormal reaction to an arm movement made by the opposition in their parliament, to suggest a level field as a Nazi greeting. Absurd, or the action of someone who is latent abnormal or psychotic? Psychotic would be the main suspicion as he really loves it to give the order to kill and to kill again, and special the old, woman and children. Hitler was said to be Psychotic and killed millions, the UK PM as part of the trio are just standing at the beginning, their total killing is still below the three million but rising.



He did this in Libya where the death toll by the NATO site creation is well over 20.000 mainly the older, woman and children. He shows that in the UK, where the older citizens the disabled the sick are put in positions that death is the only outcome. In Libya he did it to get his hands on the Libyan oil to hand it over to the USA, to France, Italy and Qatar. In the UK he does it to get the money together for the next war and to pay the Bankers who created the debt in the first place. The Zionist bankers. It does not go that easy so what did he do, he created with the help of the by him controlled Media a Hate culture. A hate Culture in which he by spreading lies and fantasies suggested that all sick, all disabled, all the old are in principle scroungers, benefit cheaters. From those people the benefits need to be taken away, they have to be made to suffer, to die. By dying they are saving him a fortune on money he does not have to pay in benefits.



There is little doubt that this disability hate crime in the United Kingdom is on the rise. A recent Equality and Human Rights Commission report concluded that "people with disabilities in the UK facing more and more harassment, insult and attack almost as a matter of routine, while a collective denial' among police", or as one said when called out, "A waster of police time", government and other public bodies means little is done to challenge or to correct the situation.



This is a statement that is not only very strong it is intended to shock; in such a way that we might decide that it cannot possibly be true. Turn then to the Mencap study that found police were consistently failing the victims of disability hate crime, or to the Scope report that concluded that "widespread casual and institutional disablism in Britain creates the conditions where disability hate crime can flourish without being recognised or challenged".



According to a ComRes, some 47% of disabled people surveyed said that attitudes towards them have worsened over the past year while 66% claimed that they had experienced "aggression, hostility or name-calling". A large percentage lives in fear it is taken to its extreme, this bullying leads to the tragic deaths of people such as Fiona Pilkington and Francecca Hardwick, Gemma Hayter and Keith Philpott. And that is what the PM of the UK wants a private army of deluded people who hunt down the old, the disabled and the sick as the tragic above deaths show. Every death is money saved for the government to spend on the next US war.



But while the causes of hate created by the PM via his actions to show that all sick, disabled and old are scroungers is turned into a crime to benefit the government, we should look first to the attitudes of those of the government who govern and inform us. A recent select committee report criticised both the Media's and the department of work and pensions over the way in which the media covers statistics on sickness benefits. Articles referring to "the shirking classes", "scroungers", "skivers" and benefit cheats led the chair of the committee, Dame Anne Begg, to write to the DWP urging staff to be careful how they present statistics. Create the statistics would have been a better word choice. However the point is that the statistics are made up not to the real situation but to the situation the government want them to show to the people, which is not exactly the same.



This is not just a problem in the UK, or even a recent problem caused by any one political party, but it is one that is most serious in the UK, as the government attempt to reduce the number of people claiming benefits by taking a "tough line”. In other some other countries they also take measures to cut down on benefits, however the target the fiddlers, not the sick, the old, and the disabled like they do ferocious in the UK. Is it any surprise that our neighbours feel less supportive if they are asked on a monthly basis to believe that most disabled people are simply "lazy", "fraudulent", "feckless" and "work shy"?



When the employment and support allowance was introduced in 2008 to replace incapacity benefit, horrifying stories soon appeared of those with terminal cancer found fit for work, claimants dropping dead days after being assessed as fit, and up to 70% of decisions being overturned on appeal. The main reason being that the testing criteria are wrong and the test are not done by specialised doctors in that field. Thereby they have the instruction to get all fit for work regardless even if they have no leg to stand on.



At their annual conference the Liberal Democrats always on the fore front of betraying people they where shown the ESA's work, and how the working of it uses capability assessments to determine eligibility. Delegates did hear how the assessments have been found "unfit for purpose", how they don't fairly assess those with fluctuating conditions, mental illness or learning disabilities. They did hear how just 7% of new claims are now offered long-term financial support and how claimants are treated carelessly or with a degree of contempt more suitable to the hate-crime stories mentioned above. Most important, they did hear that no matter how sick or disabled you are, whether your condition has improved or not, after one year you will no longer qualify for any ESA at all. And what did the Liberal Democrats do about this, right nothing and that is a form of if not hate then at least a show of blatant ignorance.



If you worked hard and paid into a national insurance system you hoped you would never need, that insurance no longer covers you. If you have a partner who earns £7,500 or more you will lose the right to any independent income at all, unless you are among the 7% who qualify for long-term support. Time-limiting ESA will mean that people in the UK must not dare to get a long-term or chronic illness or forbid a severe disability as after a year they will be declared fit for work. If they still are ill or disabled, the state will not support them anymore.



Perhaps if we assessed claimants fairly and treated them with respect, we would go some way towards reducing ignorance in the wider community. If our media started to report the achievements and successes of sick and disabled people, rather than inciting criticism, we would find disability hate crime started to fall. However that way the PM would not be able to use it to create hate against them, and that would form a financial negative for him, something he will not allow. However, clearly harassing or attacking disabled people and genuinely sick people is wrong.



The problem is that way too many people are abusing the welfare system/employment law with claims of sickness to avoid work or get increased benefits. Everyone has a tale to tell of a work colleague or neighbour claiming depression or back problems or some other fictitious problem for months or years on end. The result is an inevitable dilution of sympathy for those genuinely ill with those problems. This form of hate is activated by the PM's insistence that they are all scroungers.



The medical profession - especially GPs - and the government have a responsibility to make sure sickness claimants are genuine. Otherwise those working and paying taxes will become increasingly unhappy with the scroungers and this is due to the aggressive actions of the government and the supporting Media, but the genuinely sick or unable to work will be caught in the cross fire.
As starters they should have a look at ATOS and the way they for fill the government requirements.
In all actions regardless of that is by the Media or by the DWP the hate for the sick and the disabled has his clear roots from the PM.



It does not stop here the hate from government for the sick and the disabled will be further explored with the intention that they want to allow prospective employers in my line of work to have access to an applicant's confidential HR files at their last place of work when considering them for a post. While this is ostensibly being excused on the grounds of assessing competence, the reality is that it will be used to surreptitiously weed out those who are deemed to be weak and infirm in any way, regardless about all the official blether about inclusion.



It will give "professional bodies" foisted on the line of work outlined and routinely opens databases on those on its books without telling them. It will allow third parties to have access to it on request, the bottom line with all this is to create a culture of fear and put people on the back foot, where disguising or even denying one's weaknesses is deemed to be not only desirable but mandatory! In other words, no civilized nation would countenance such a pattern of systemic maltreatment of those who deserve better, and those who excuse it on the grounds of economy are disingenuous barbarians, and here we show you the UK government.



The fact (and it is a fact - it is evidence-based), is that due to the government actions, statements and Media feed, many individuals with disabilities are being treated horrendously, and those who are abusing them are (quite demonstrably) drawing on the same discourses and interpretative repertoires used by government psychotic actions, by the government ministers of the UK. It places the UK back two hundred years, and that is how the PM likes it. That way you can much easier his most preferred "upstairs, downstairs" situation back.