29-7-2007

Evolution in races.

Pupils on all kind of schools, but also students and even adults are often asking the same question,
The bible said that all races were decended from the same origin of humans.
Every religion has his own version of how that happened.
For example the Christians have the believe that this is possible and that it is all down to Noah sons.
They pass by, conviently, that traces are different by statue and colour. The creationist insist that the first humans and with that they pointing again at Noah sons, had that kind of genes.
That it is possible to create totally different humans in statue and skin colour, from the sons of Noah.

That did not happen, which is blatant obvious, but the creationist use it anyway as otherwise they have no explanation. In short, it is a convenient story and they make the rest up as they go along making sure that they never have to supply any proof of this absolute miracle.
They have the simplest of explanation, with variations depending from which corner of the discussion it will come, which is that all humans are inter-fertile and therefore that must be the proof that all humans are descended of one original human.

Nothing is further of the truth, that there are mountains of evidence that their thesis is not correct is put aside that there are possible defective genes.
The simple fact is that the Creationist have always answers but never any proof, although they say it is proof as it is in the bible, the bible being a collection of folks tales dating back thousands of years and after having been told from generation to generation were written down at last. Still being folks tales as we have all over the world with exception that we take most stories for what they are, stories.
This put the Creationist on line with the thousand years ago storyteller, and a fantastic story it is however, without any form of proof.

Saying this Creationist come up with, we do not believe the Evolutionist; they do not believe proof given by science. They do this not because they do not believe it but by saying so casting doubt on the efforts by Evolutionist and science. At the same time, they do not give any proof that science is wrong or that the Creation can be proven. They just act as a confidence trickster by casting doubt. There main point is, just believe us, and do not ask any questions. This is a natural reaction as they are not able to answer the question in any case, then referring again to the bible.

If they would stop ridiculing the Evolutionists and gave support then it would be possible in time to get the balance to one side or the other side, but basing your defence on a story book regardless how famous it is, is no defence.

Evolutionists have proven by argument and science that the study of similarities in biological structures between various species, the similarity between them is clear evidence of a common biological background.
The Creationist are more straight forwards they just talk and do not have to proof anything, as they are right. However, they say it is most important that the Evolutionist deliver solid proof of everything they say and do. Their rhetoric is that because the Evolutionist has to deliver the proof
they the Creationist do not have to do so. They are acting as a door-to-door sales clerk with nothing to sell then stories. They are convinced that the world was created and that is it, they translating
De nihilo nihil fit, as all things possible instead of from nothing comes nothing.

The argument of the Creationist is a simple one; all what the Evolutionist are saying or do is just imaginary, the sequence of Earths development does not exist. Fossils if they have to admit that they exist are put aside, as accidental embryological evidence does not exist.
They accept only one argument, the existence of God the Creator as infinitely self-containing who is and was always there. For this, they do not require any proof.
Their weakest point is the First Clause. God was always there that is the proof.
It does not answer the question but then again Creationist almost never do.