January 2011

04/01/2011


Enter the church of the money changers.


Sad as it is money is in certain quarters one of the most precious good one can have. Others want to be famous first and then they want to be rich, as rich made happy and content. Live itself makes you happy if you let it happen, the drive for glory and money is the main obstacle to happiness. Money make me happy is a well-known phrase, it never does it makes the person rich, but being rich is not a free card to happiness or an good health.


Beings belonging to such a group who actual believe as such in money as their way to happiness and salvation, also have in common that they want to belong. Not all of those who belief in money as their way to happiness actual do believe this however they maybe not all belong or believe in money as an one way ticket to happiness but to please the ones in power, in them they will believe.


They are prepared to sink to the lowest level of humanity to please their Master who controls the money. They step on the ones who cannot defend themselves are of no concern of them. They are the Masters orders so they do it in the hope that it pleases him, and that the smile of him may light their path to a richer live and more power.



Money always had the attraction by those who do not believe in mankind as a whole. They see the world as an opening for their life in luxury and riches. The Bible learns us who Jesus destroyed the tables of the money changers sitting in front of the Temple, saying this is the house of God and you have made it as a den for thieves. Did they listen to him, of course they did not, as soon as he had left the wheeling and dealing started again, just as it goes on today. The creation of many methods of pressing money out of States, business or the people is still one of the most lucrative entertainment. They maybe not doing it in front of the Temple any more but the system is still the same, take what you can and create new avenues to create more money possibilities. Did the Jews it then small scaled they in the centuries have spread out and call themselves bankers. However, it are still the same money changers that Jesus removed from the Temple square.



Sadly many of those who glorifying that money sitting also on Sunday on the front benches of the Synagogues and Churches. Every body that way can see how rich they are and how much power they have not realising that the Book says \u2018\u2019 he who raises himself above the people, will be humiliated.\u2019\u2019 However those nowadays money changers could not care less it is money and power they want and it is money and power they get. Many of those in those Synagogues and Churches are feeling the need to be grateful to be in the same church as those rich ones with power, as that will shine on them. They can tell friends and family that they have been in close contact in the church with those rich and powerful and hope that this fact may shine on them and those others will feel jealous not to have been there to witness this. They can do name dropping to gain standing, and hope that others will admire them for their closeness to the rich.



The word will spread and in time they hope that because of the closeness with the rich they will earn respect themselves. However this is not the way of the Word as the Word of God is good. How can they please two God\u2019s, one who tells them to help each other and do Good, the other to tell them to rob the others and get richer by doing so. What do we have to make out of the simple fact that the believers of the almighty of money also believe in the Almighty God the saviour of our souls who is simple instructions to be good to others as you expect others to be good to you.



Here we have a crucial problem as good Christians we can do good to others help them support them and accompany them on the pathway to our Lord and Saviour.
In return, do they receive the goodness they may have expected? Naturally, not, they are laughed at behind their back, seen as simple because of the help they give others without asking money in return no money no percentage. What is even worst in the eyes of the believers of the money, is that those Samaritans are given money away, to those who need it. They actual help them, does it not make your stomach turn, and they find it sick that someone actual helps others without asking money for it. It is completely against their belief; it is against all the rules of the money changers.



You cannot give something away unless you expect to be rewarded for that deed in money several times over. You cannot help the poor, the old or the handicapped by illness or accident, no the money changer requires payment at all times. The money changers instructions are clear come down hard on those humans who defy his rules. They force others they are able to control by the force of money to obey, look at the Republicans in the US or the Conservatives in the UK. Poor, old and handicapped by accident or by illness are a waste of space, if they do not have money there can be no profit and if there is no profit then get rid of them, fast. If one section of the believers in money cannot handle that on their own, then other believers should help in and finish the job.



There to many examples in daily life to pass by, Christianity has survived for two thousand years it has grown and expanded by spreading the word to others. That corner stone is now slowly eroded, seeing that on the foundation of that corner stone is now slowly building a new one in the glory of the money changers in tradition of their ancestors in the Temple 2000 years ago. It has built a new church inside the old one with the power of money and ignorance to destroy, the poor the old and the handicapped by illness or accident.



However is it ignorance, could it be simple stupidity, after all money is won and lost almost every hour of the day, and to hope that one day you will have enough money that makes rich and the step to power, is many of times a day slashed by the loss of money.


The very basic of Christianity is being good and does good.
The alternative has to be Evil and Evil is spreading faster then ever over the world then ever before, beliefs are fading away churches are emptying from believers. Christian Countries are waging war against minorities in search for money, riches, oil, gas and minerals. To hell with the Word of Jesus, you shall not kill, to hell with the word of God to Moses, thou shall not kill, there is money to be made in an once in a lifetime chance. Dead soldiers are easy to replace and the ones who give the order who hunting the money, are never the ones who are in the line of fire, they are the ones who are cashing in.



That evil is spreading fast is special good to see at the beginning of this century, we have the US fighting in Afghanistan to control the heroin, the oil, the gas and the minerals. They kill all what moves and what is still alive and do not obey will be killed later. The killed Afghans children are the next in line to be killed unless they obey. They did fight in Iraq to control the oil and wants to be fighting in Iran to control the oil there, that all on the flimsiest of reasons, while at other places such as Zimbabwe, people are killed on a daily base and nobody lift a finger, the diamond trade is an to prestige commodity not worth to upset the rulers, let them do the killing and cash in for the money, yes evil is spreading fast.



As a result, the world is a more dangerous place to live, this combined with a deep recession and high oil prices created by those senseless wars, orchestrated by the money changers which put many lives at risk but also supply the powerful with loads of money and that is not Christianity but pure Evil. On local levels, we see the same, Governments who ignore the old, and the handicapped by accident or by illness. Property owners we have a reign of terror over their tenants all in the name of money and power they single out the old and the handicapped by illness or by accident all in the name of the money, praising God in front of the Synagogues and Churches no religion in sight other then by name only.



In conclusion we can say with an guaranteed certainty that the Abrahamic religions are slowly becoming religions in name only and that the real religion is called Money the source of all evil.
What buys power, Money! What buys standing, Money. What is the bases of all Evil, Money.
What buys the arms for killing people all over the world, Money. What put people down and under pressure, Money.


We can go on and on with this list almost forever but the point is made, now bow your heads for the new God, Money the root of all Evil. He will expand his reign further and further setting country against country human against human religion against religion, rich against the poor, healthy against the sick and handicapped by illness or accident, the young against the old.
Nothing can stop this as that will cost money and the aim is to get it, not to loose it.

Power in reality money, creed, ignorance or plain stupidity, all comes down to the same essence, money create creed, power and ignorance. Power corrupt we see that in daily life at any moment of the day and we can hear almost the hollow laugh of the Master of Evil.

The evil spirit who collect more and more souls who will depend on him, he will call for more wars for more evil more fighting, setting up religion against religion poor countries against the rich, till civilisation is lost in an all out war on earth of which the signs are already very much visible. The money changers will wins hands down and will triumph over the religions any religion. The religion will still be there in name only with the faithful visitors still filling the benches to see the rich and the famous, the ones in power. If those money changers would not go to the Synagogues or Churches anymore those places would be empty as many already are. It is money what counts, to the hell with every else. At the end, that is exactly where they will go
and where the Master of Evil is waiting for them, HELL.

=======================================================

06/01/2011

The word teaches us that God is good Almighty All-powerful, and we have no doubt that this believe find widespread knowledge by people who need a survival kit to come through life. Regardless of this survival kit has the name of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu or any other religion or believe written on it. It is still an survival kit, a place to belong to, a place for a cry of help in times that faith tries to wear you down.



The more inquisitive want to know some more about this and query the words of Good, Almighty and All-powerful. We know from the Word that he pretend to be All-Good and All-Powerful but is this correct are we not taken in by something for which there is no concrete proof, nor have we any examples for that All-Good and that All-powerful, what we do have are some serious queries about the Goodness of that Word.



If we read the Word we find contradiction upon contradiction, Evil upon Evil instigated by that Word. The Word said you shall not kill, but the Gods people in Israel were almost constant at war, if not with their neighbours then between themselves. In today's situations they still do the same arguing and killing seems to be their main occupation, while at the same time they hide like real cowards behind the words "we have the right to defend ourselves". This point is similar to a group of gangsters attacking a child and if the child hit back, they kill it with the excuse we just defended ourselves. Or just as the US who attack small countries and if the hit back are then invaded under the heading we just defend ourselves.That every country is an Muslim state is just an coincidence. So can we really rely on that Word, a word that has so many times shown to instigate wars, killings and destruction by the very people who claim to be living by the Word.



Can we trust that the Word is indeed an mirror of reallity or do we have to see it as a make up story to create the excuses for wars, killings and destruction. Do we really have to understand that when Adam had two sons and one was killed by the other, God gave the following instruction "Cain to be a fugitive and a vagabond shall thou be on the Earth". We beg ignorance but there was Adam and Eve plus Cain as Abel was dead, does God said fugitive and if so, from what, there were only three of them. A vagabond where is that coming from as there were only three people on earth. In addition, were is that vagabond coming in from, as they could not know what that was as there was never one before.



Therefore, the Word said, Cain left and went to the land of Nod, and there he found suddenly a wife. How that was possible the Word does not explain. There were three people on earth Adam, Eve and Cain. The bible does not explain were that wife was coming from there East of Eden. The word also does not explain were the family or at least the father and mother of that wife were coming from. The word clearly state three people after Abel's death. Till then there were no other children born out of Adam and Eve, so what ever the story nobody could have been there east of Eden.The Word does not give any indication of any other creations by God,so here we have a real question mark. Not only he found himself a non-existing wife but he also builds a city, for 2 people?



Let us not forget we taken the Bible as the Word as being instructed by God in the Christian doctrine.



So let us go back to the original set-up. Here we have Adam and Eve with there sons Cain and Abel.
Cain slew Abel after this Adam had a son named Seth after that he had sons and daughters.



We suddenly notice that God has more sons see Genesis 6:2-4 and Giants, there must be things in the creation he did not tell us about, not only that the sons of God took the daughters of man whom bare children to them. In addition, if we read the book of Enoch we see that not only God had more then one son, but behold! His cometh with ten thousands of His holy ones.



Heaven, there must be a place to house all those sons who took the daughters of man and were Giants or as Enoch said Angels or what ever is nearest and then there ware the ten thousand holy ones. Heaven must be quickly becoming a rather crowdie place. It is in the book of Enoch that the translation is not sons of God. However, of angels who lusted after the daughters of man.
The book of Enoch also explains the Giants being children of the daughters of man taken by the sons of God or angels whatever comes first. And the Giants were three thousand ells in height. We are now right in story land. However,what still is not clear that if the giants were evil, and they did not obey the Lords commands. Why did he wanted to destroy all humans who were created to his own image, we know now at least what God does look like as humans were made to his image,however it were the giants, his sons that created havoc. So why to destroy all life and plants all trees, and maybe the humans were at fault but what about the plants and the animals, why kill them all rather sadistic for an All-Good God, either that or there is something wrong with the word.


One conclusion can be made after the readings of the Word and the books of Enoch, we can forgett that all-powerful. He could obvious not control his own sons, nor the situation they created. As an result he killed all the humans, the plants, the trees and all animals while his sons were save in Heaven or surroundings. And all had not be needed if the Almighty not had planted the forbidden tree, the way of that puzzles many, Why doing that if as he said himself he looked at it and it was good, obvious not that good. Mabey he planted the tree and the snake to test Adam and Eve, the question WHY? comes in mind as what he created was good why testing it, he was after all all-good and all-powerful.



Now for the real world, of course the Bible is the Word but does it need to be so taken literary, after all it took thousands of years before even the smallest of characters were invented and the written down stories are only parts of a story told. The rest was transferred from generation to generation. We all know what storytellers can do. They make the story larger or smaller, more exiting or less leave evil out or brought more in just as what the public wanted. Then sifting through the stories which only can be done in the light of those stories and the earliest known written stories such as the epic of Gilgamesh and the Enuma Elish the Dead Sea scrolls and the Hebrew stories.



All those stories adding up to one thing for the believer, there is a God who Created Heaven and Earth although in the writers opinion not in the time limited of Genesis but over an much longer period. There was and that is without any doubt for the believers Jesus Christ, the learning\u2019s from him and his followers are well known.



So if we simple come back with two feet on Earth. Then leave out the Hebrew History, the Semitic\u2019s, and the Sumerians the Amorites stories. And we stick with Christianity while using the Hebrew bible as a back up as how it all started. Then we can bring back the Christianity to peoples life, as the many stories what make up the old Testament create to many doubts. The New Testament is the bases for Christianity, not an old Jewish story book it has nothing to do with it other then being a back ground of the story to Christianity. The more knowledgeable human beings of our time are asking calculating questions of which the answers are not fort coming other then silly explanation as were every slightly intelligent person will stick through within seconds.

By doing so yet another soul is lost because if they have doubt about the Old Testament then doubt creeps also in for the New Testament and if that does happen there interest is lost. Let the old testament to be the book for the Jews, after all they on thrumped up charges had Jesus killed, just as they still killing thousands on made up stories. And if Jesus would come back to Israel they would do the killing again. Spitting in the faces of those who actual believe that Jesus the all-knowing would go back to Israel with the knowledge that they the Jews would kill him again on made up charges. They done it ones they will do it again.

We have unfortunately to many so called Christians who are stuck in a dogma to believe all what is in the Book must be correct because it is in the Book, we hope that who ever read this will feel as we feel, There is a God and Jesus Christ and we cannot pass by on the incredibility of the Creation which we see daily, but we have to accept that next to the incredibility of the Creation there are others who prefer Evil and do Evil by using the Bible and the Word, and only if we by strengthening our believe can defeat them.
**************************************************

08-01-2011

Of the many riddles in life, the question of who was the first one on earth is a fascinating one.
We all know who was the first man on the moon, the first one on the pole’s, but who was the first man on earth.

Many religions claim that their original ancestor was the first and if we would believe the Abrahamic religions there was an man called Adam who was the first, although the same story that reveals the creation of Adam out of dust also reveals that the same creator created already before that a male and female. As that story does not add up it will obvious that who was the first is still hidden in mystery.


However the Abrahamic religions have us to believe Adam was the first and they point to the writings of the Jewish history and the beginning of the Bible. Hereby they simple ignore the fact that there is no proof that the story as given by the Jews was a real occurrence and nothing else than a clever story to put the wool over the peoples eyes. As we see with the Hamas/Palestinians story, most of what the Jews say about it is pure fantasy. As a graffiti writing in a Chicago station said, "When do you know the Israeli Gov. Lies, they move their lips".


However, maybe they do they have any proof of this man being the first; however, the answer has to be a clear no they have not. They simple belief their own writings as they do still daily, as an pamphlet last week said and which was repeated by an rabbi: the Jews are Holy. From that point of view it will be obvious that all they say and do are acts of Holyness. That is to say in their opinion. For the outsiders the state of Israel is simple re-enacting the actions of the Third Reich from Hitler, with a twist so that instead of Hitler’s Jews, the Jews using Arabs instead, the rest is the same. Including torture, murder, enslaving, theft, concentration camps, and new camps are in the making. However, the Israeli Government said they are only for immigrants. Then again 99% of the Jews living in Israel are indeed immigrants and should be, by their own words be transferred to those camps. As no sensible and intelligent person believes the story that God spoke with Abram and gave him all the land, they simple as they still do daily, stole it, killed the inhabitants, as they still do and took over as they still do today.

It does not mean that Jews do not have the right of land of their own. However let it be clear; Jewish is a religion not a nationality. It is therefore too made clear that there is a different between the believers in the Jewish religion and the occupants of the state of Israel. Although just over 70% is thought to be Jewish of religion, there are three other main groups of religion. Therefore it is obvious that the state of Israel is a Jewish state in the same context as that the USA and the UK are Christian states. It does not mean that in the Christian states, Christians have more rights than non-Christians. However in Israel Jewish religion people have more rights then non-Jewish people for that reason by definition Israel is not an Democratic state then only in name and that only because they are standing under protection of the USA and the UK and special the USA can hardly be called an Democratic country then in name only.



Israel in the mean time is acting in the same way as the Hitler led Germans did before the holocaust started. Did Hitler act against the Jews with a violence and arrogance and aggression not seen before. The Israeli do exactly the same against the Arabs, with the same excuse, “we have to defend ourselves". The different being that the Jews claiming be a Semitic group, which they never were and are not, they are Europeans, Africans and others who speaking in most cases Hebrew which is an Semitic language. At present 60% of the Israeli are born in Israel after 1948 out of immigrant parents from Europe mainly. They are speaking Hebrew a Semitic language mostly because they live in Israel it does not make them a Semitic population. Their actions against the Arab population makes them by definition Anti-Semitic's. Speaking Hebrew make you not automatically a Semitic person as the writer knows, he does speak it among others.



The Israeli's are many times removed although in some cases decendent of the Hebrews who at some time did live in what is now Israel, and for that we have to go thousands of years back. To claim as they do that they are the legal owners of Israel is an absurdity based on a mere fantasy of a character out of their story called Abram. This man claimed to have spoken with God in which promised that Israel would be his for him and his children in all time to come. This is about the same as the Vikings of Denmark could claim that North America was theirs because in the thousands of years past an Viking ship landed their and they claimed it to be their land, so the Danes can now claim North America and sling the Americans out. Absurd? Yes absurd indeed but that is what the Jews did in 1948 as reward from the USA and UK for financing the war and the recovery.



The arrogance of the Israeli to claim Holyness of their people, destruction of all who think different is that of a country that has more violence and aggression in them then Brains to go with it, let alone holyness. The claim that Arab people are raiding Israeli villages and cities and have already kidnapped 15000 Jewish girls is such an absurdity. However it is written in the Rabbi spread leaflets in Israel. Looking Arab in Israel is a crime at it self, raiding a village is due to the enormous security an absolute impossibility.


Still the Rabbis of Israel using it to inflame the situation. Man can ask themselves in earnest of which the Worlds people have more to fear, the Israeli Rabbis or the extreme Muslim Mullah's. The answer has to be the Israeli Rabbis. They have more power than the Israeli Government and they could drop that Government at any time if they wanted too. Looking it from this angle then it will be obvious that the claim of having spoken with God, being Holy people and being descendent of the first man on earth must be taken with a large pinch of salt. Even in the middle Ages there was doubt over the claim that Adam was the first human created, the almighty Roman Church suppressed this after all there was money to be made. Still there are severe doubts about that claim and no proof is ever presented to quit the doubters.



Most members of Abrahamic religions are from early childhood indoctrinated with the story that Adam was the first human on Earth. And in tradition of those religions it was accepted without any doubts, and maybe they were right to do so.


However let us examine the facts as written in the Abrahamic religions.


We know for example that the Bible in Genesis 1 reveals the creation of Earth with all that is on it and in it, beneath and above it.


We also know that in Genesis 1.26 the bible reveals that He intended to make man in his own image, after his own likeness. It also reveals how God looks like, as he created it to his own image. It cannot be that it was a matter of speaking as there was no man on Earth yet, so comparison was not possible, therefore God must be look like a human. However, beside this Genesis 1.27 goes on with; so God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him, male and female created he them. Then in Genesis 1.28; God said to them, be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth and subdue it.
Genesis 1.33; God saw all that he had made and behold it was very good, and the evening and the morning were the sixth day.



In short God created male and female told them to fill the earth and to subdue it.
And so we have male and female walking the earth, being fruitful and multiplying them as instructed by God.



But wait, then suddenly in Genesis 2.7 we learn that he decided to create out of dust a man. This time there is no mention of it being an image of God. Then we learn that God just as the Gods in the Epic of Gilgamesh, created a Garden, the famous Garden of Eden, and in that garden he put the man he had created out of dust to work, as the Book said to dress it and to keep it. Genesis 2.15/20.



So there we have it, He created male and female to walk the earth and to multiply, and then he created out of dust a man to work in the garden. Not only that he was kept rather busy as well, as God brought him all the birds and animals to give them names as God created them all. Besides this naming of all birds and animals, that garden must have been rather over crowded with all those animals. We do not touch the fact that many animals, which were given names, must have been lost in the way to find their way back to places far at the other side of the world. We also do not touch the question of the dinosaurs as they were also created.
However, while Adam was naming every fowl and beast, he had to do this on his own as there was no female to help him. Genesis 2.18.



When he was finished and all the work was done he fell in a deep sleep. Genesis 2.21 and then God made a woman out of a rib taken from Adam. Genesis 2.22. The who and why is never explained as there were already females being fruitful and walking the earth, so why not take one of them.


What is a fact is that Genesis 2 contradicts Genesis 1.


In Genesis 1, God created male and female and told them to multiply and to fill the earth.
In Genesis 2, God created only Adam and told him to look after the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 1, to replenish the earth. In Genesis 2, he needed a Gardner, being Adam. So if the Jews are the descendent of Adam the Gardner then the rest of the world then were the descendent of the male and female created in Genesis 1. Now the question here is are the Jews descendent of the gardener Adam and the rest of the world population descendent of the male and female He created in Genises 1 .This is a question that cannot be answered.



We have here one book in which there are two creations of man, one being a creation after his own image a male and a female, the other one the creation of a man out of dust, and later the creation of a female out of Adams rib. Here again we have to ask the question, as the first male and female were creations after His own image and the rest of the world population is in descendent of them, does this means that when he so ruthless and cruel destroyed all life on earth, all humans, all animals, all trees all flowers he destroyed the humans made after his own image? After all he saved the descendent of the man made out of dust and female made out of his rib.



To understand this clearly, he killed of the descendent made after his own image, but kept the descendent from the ones who broke his laws, were slung out of the Garden of Eden, those one he saved. It is no wonder that they today think they are Holy and can ignore the world and the rules of the world, the UN. The appointed survivor and his family are then the original survivors of Adam. This in turn means that we all are descended direct from Adam via his sons.


Obvious out of this is that they from their point of view Adam were the first man. After all they are the descendent from a man and woman who broke Gods Laws, were throw out of the Garden of Eden lured into a believe that they could own the land of Palestine because God had said so. Even so they were as Adam was thrown out of the Garden time after time; although that garden needs to be replaced by the land of Palestine out of that they were indeed thrown out time after time. And guess what they still have not learned that God was just joking with them. He still takes revenge for the fact that they broke his laws in the Garden of Eden, so he still throws them out time after time, the next time coming up.



Genesis 3.24 makes this obvious, after Adam and Eve were slung out of the garden; their descendent were slung out of Ur or Urik, and every other place they stayed for shorter or longer time, till they ended up in the Palestine. God they said then gave them the land. Then that same God created a drought so bad that they had to move to Egypt, were they were slung out to be ending up in Palestine again in an area that was not claimed yet by any of the there living tribes. However, time after time they were thrown out, breaking God's law every time just as they do now. They should not kill, so they kill what ever they can. Love your neighbour, so they attack them whenever they can. You shall not steal, so they steal whatever they can. You shall not take anything that belongs to your neighbours, so they take it all. These were the laws given by their own saying to them by their God, and they broke them all. Today they still break every promise they made more the one hundred UN resolution they simple ignored, although they subscribed to obey the UN decisions. Only one conclusion can be made they simple are so full of themselves, so arrogant, the same arrogance what was In Russia their downfall, in England their downfall, in Germany their downfall, and will be their downfall yet again.



The Jewish story of Adam is simple to close to the Gilgamesh story. The only conclusion therefore can be that out of the male and female created in Genesis 1, Cain found himself a wife, and the population followed out of that created the story of Gilgamesh. An Epic of such proportions that transformed and streamlined formed the base of the Jewish folktale, later written down as the Bible after hundreds of years after the birth of Christ, as the story for Jewish, Christians and Muslims alike. It may be therefore no wonder that more and more people seeking the knowledge in Kabbalah, a form of Jewish Buddhism in which the human soul has the Nefesh, the Ru'ach and the Neshamah as the basic soul elements. There are a fourth and a fifth part of the human soul the Chayyah and the Yedidah, but those are only just as in Buddhism possible within a few chosen people. The reason is obvious. Many Jews world wide are having enough of the warlike attitude of the Israeli Governments. They want the Jews to be aware that being Jewish is something different than being an Israeli Jewish citizen. They want to be Jewish with a soul that allows an awareness of the divine life force itself. They do not like to be associated with murder and mayhem as is being conducted by the Israeli Government. So those Jewish believers do one step aside and enter the Kabbalah and believe as they want to.



Does this means that there is the possibility of no God?
That there was no Adam, no Abram, no Noah or Enoch? The answer on that is simple, no doubt that there is God. What ever story people need to believe. However, a simple look around us will confirm that and even the most sceptics’ one will have to amid that there have to be something. Concerning Adam, Abram Noah or Enoch, that is open for discussion, for the ones who believe the bible as the only truth they did exist. For the ones with a more educated mind there will be question marks.



As for the openings question, who was the first man on earth, we can say with almost certainly, it was not Adam.
For the question who it was we simple do not know and never will be known this.
It was for that reason that the Hebrews created Adam; they needed a good story with a packing beginning, otherwise the story would not have had a beginning at all.

========================================================


10-01-2011

Television and the Internet are two of the media’s which are watched most for the daily news next to that is reading the news either in the news papers or on separate web sides.


Both items were invented to entertain, to make ourselves and other to feel good.
We now are following the news on the Internet the newspapers and the mobile phone and have our vision on what occurs in the world..


We have our own selected sides channels and newspapers based on or point of view in the world. We form our opinions on what we see, and the ones who are seeing only their side will not question what they are shown or what they read.


For the one who are reading or watching both sides of the opinions, the picture gets more complicated, more curios by every day passed by.
Even by the observed person seeing only one side of the debate it will be obvious that something is not as it should be.


The truth is not being told.


We have leaders who persuade us to believe that they acting in our best interest and that they with the help of God will bring us prosperity and protection. Then we find out that that means killing people, invading other people’s countries, and if those countries complain they are slaughtered. We are told that the war in Iraq is finished but that 50.000 men will stay there. This is to make sure that the Iraqi do what they are told by the US if not than the 50.000 will kill just another 100.000 people to press to point home, OBEY.


It has always been the philosophy of leaders that what they say is right and what others say is a lie. So that the winner is always right and the looser is always lying, even if it is accepted that it is the truth we are still told it is a lie. Although the winner is always right it does not mean that it is the truth, they will still say it is the truth even if we all know it is a lie. So when is the truth a lie and when is a lie the truth? This is a simple to answer question; the truth is a lie when it is told by a country that is not a friend or vassal of the US. A lie is the truth when it is told by the US. It is as simple as that.


It does there for not really matter who starts a conflict, as the general rule is simple.
The winner was telling the truth even if it is knowingly a lie and the looser was lying even if it was knowingly the truth.
One side will tell their supporters it was the other side, just as the other side will do.
So both could be lying and both could be telling the truth.


The real truth will be somewhere in between, while both sides try to score points not hesitating to drag other political figures of the other side through the mud.
The other side will do exactly the same by also using the weirdest and most stupid remarks to accentuate a point, a point they do not have. So will Israel and the US with their vassals having us to believe that Iran has nuclear weapons intentions, the fact that the proof shows they have not is not a point, Mossad said so and in line with the force they copy the former German SS, they are always right. Same style same tactics same aggressive violence.


We found the explanation of how to tell a lie.
Here it goes; a lie is only a lie when it is quit obvious believed not to be the truth, however, the lie is not a lie when others believe the lie is in fact the truth. And if you tell a lie long enough the people will belief that it is the truth. That is the way propaganda works tell it long enough and the people will belief it.
And now the whole clarity of the question of what is a lie and what is the truth is hidden in a thick fog.


Out of the above it will be clear that every lie can be the truth and that every truth can be in fact a lie, just depending on what side you stand and what principles you have. So operates the US CIA operatives who blown up aeroplanes as an act of terror in other countries, while at the same time the US tells us that they take a stand against terror. So murder the Israeli people in other countries under the heading we have to defend ourselves. If that was correct every murderer in any country could claim that they only did the killing to defend themselves.


Exception is maybe the UK were self defence is a crime, and were you are not allowed to defend yourself at any time, even not if your life is in danger. You are in the UK allowed to tell the attackers not to do it, but you are not allowed to defend, if there was a chance that the attackers could be hurt. Your death is accepted as a fact of which the committer of the act never is arrested, but hurting an attacker will end you up in jail for a long time to come. With a Government that robs the people penniless they need such a law to protect themselves.
It will now be clear that the border between lie and truth is made almost invisible and that almost nobody can establish what is a lie or what is the truth.


For leaders it is made much more easier, all they have to do is to pack the lie into a great story line and it will be seen as the truth, pack the lie in an acceptable packet and it will accepted as the truth. Leaders are able to do that, look at G W Bush and Tony Blair and their WMD. Look at Obama with peace in the world while fighting with more US soldiers the ever before on more places. Look at South Korea were the premier uses his failed policies to crick up violence between the south and the north.


Leaders of Countries are not interested in the truth or lie for that matter, but only in the way they can present a lie as the truth so that the people will believe it. They use the Media to forward their points of view in the way they want the people to see it. That way if it goes wrong you blame others as they were not telling the truth.


The great example is the credit crunch the recession. The leaders blame the banks.
However, it was not the banks; they only did what they were supposing to do making money and lots of it. Taking risks they should not have been allowed to take, but there was government willing to stop them. As we know the risks are being paid by the ordinary people, not by governments, not by the banks.

The leaders were not telling and are still not telling the truth. They should have regulated the banks long time ago. The leaders were warned many of times that the banks were taking financial risks. They could have curtailed the amounts of lending, the height of the charges, and the maximum of mortgages. They did not do so they failed.


The leaders should have curtailed the utility companies who screwed up their prices to a ridicules height, but again the leaders did not do anything than playing the blame game.
Special in the UK, one of the countries hardest hit by the downfall, the leader could have done a lot of things to stop the Utility Companies from grabbing a fortune, they did not, instead the fuel prices in the UK are rising faster then anywhere in the world and are now nearly the highest in the Western world.


Again in the UK but also in the US the leaders could have curtailed the greed and grab policies of the so-called social landlords, were income in the last couple of years alone in the UK rocketed up to 400% and with that the rent increases. The leaders again do not do anything, they talk a lot. What the leaders however did drastically was increasing the income of the rich, but workers NO they have to hand in as much as they can.


The leaders are blaming the international banking, and although that can be partly correct their uncontrollable greed did not stop the incredible rise of the oil and gas prices, they could have done that, but that would have affected their own pockets.

The same leaders, wants actions against the Fat Cats, while they are in fact the fat cats. Whole countries are suffering under the recession, income is down in real terms, wages are going down, and spending is less. Except for the deputies of the people and their Governments their income is not going down, their spending is not going down, but they sneer at the normal people, hitting it with all kind of hidden taxes.

Leaders should have enough brains or common sense that if spending is down and people are going bankrupt you do not hit them with extra hidden taxes.


Do the leaders do anything to reduce those incomes that profit those fat cats, no they do not.
It is presented as the truth while all can see it is a lie.



Man can argue that leaders of the affected Western countries would have the duty to put his own country first. European, Chinese, Russian and most of the other countries do so. But no not in the US, there the leader throws still money around as of there is a bottom less pit full of money for him to spend. On the other if a country is so far in debt as the US is then it does not really matter of they go on spending money they do not have. However what if the Jewish bankers say enough is enough? Already we see that Israel see themselves in a stronger position in which they efficiently ignore the US and his president and the UN as not being relevant anymore.



For an outsider it looks that the leaders are on a an a ego trip, to make himself look like a great statesman and no doubt they will tell us that they now has saved the world, and the US and the world are now in save hands. Then he will climb the world stage and will claim that he is the best, the savoir of the world and only he can save all of us.



It is than time to run for the exit doors, while at that door the US president stands and ask the US citizen for the money to foot the trillion plus bill, as that will have to be paid by the tax payer. That this taxpayer does not have anything to give anymore is not of his concern, there can always be another hidden tax put in place, to fill his pockets. Obvious, he does not have to pay for his ego trip himself as he is the great celebrated leader, and so we all have our dreams.



At the end all the leaders in the western world and their vassals will have promised to make the world a better place and simple to kill all who do not want to obey. The empty stomachs in their countries citizens, well who cares it is not their stomach that is empty so what. They always can ask the Media to publish other stories to make it look like a rose filled garden, after all what is a lie if you tell them long enough.

============================================================


12-01-2011

We have the UN as a protected wall against mafia style operating countries. We are also aware that the UN is in fact a talking club whose decisions can be ignored at any time by any country. The small countries with enough minerals will be called to obey or be run over by one of the mafia style countries.


Look at the Americans, they stealing the oil from illegal occupied countries, they stealing the land from UN members Cuba), they threatening other countries to obey or to be killed. America a perfectly hidden dictatorship. The American people love it, their yell America, America, it brings the people together just as the "Sieg Heil" did in Nazi Germany. They do not know the truth, they do not want to know the truth, just follow the leader till it is too late.


Many countries through history conducted their violence exactly in the same way. The last best known was Nazi Germany.
There the yell Sieg Heil and Heil Hitler, was the glue that kept the Germans together, they did not want to know the truth, just follow the leader till it was too late.


However, it are not the Americans who are the hidden dictatorship, it are not the Americans who are ruled by their American government. The hidden dictatorship are the Jewish bankers, they gave the money which is now strangling the US economy. They gave the money in exchange for the arming of Israel. Then they gave more money for which they asked that the US would protect Israel from awkward questions in the UN. So much money and no achievements to speak about.


The USA is now a dependency of Israel whose government simple ignores the Americans as insignificant. The Americans together with their dependencies Europe and Canada can do nothing else then sit back and see that all they were thinking they did have is crumbling away. The Americans are not seen anymore as the power that would holt the world in peace, but as an country which lost his way in a mountain of debt and money owned to the people who's ancestors were already for that same fact, money changing, thrown out of the Temple in Jerusalem two thousand years ago and given the name as thieves and robbers. The name is still actual and still stands.

Israel's arrogance and lawlessness is growing by the day, its violence aggression lies theft and illegal policies are now being openly branded world wide by almost every country except of the EU and USA. Now even the UN is getting enough of the international gangster style of actions from Tel Aviv. They robbing stealing and killing as of it is the most normal thing in the world to do imitating the violent actions from the International terrorist, what they are and copy the style of the drug barons in illegal activities. They steal land and build on it while they do not legal posses it. They robbing food and goods from Palestinians in the hope that those Palestinians will die quicker. They rob and steal the grounds, villages and goods from the Bedouins, to build more nuclear plants and they murder every one who does not agree or protests.

They are given the real Jewish believer world wide a bad name as they are associated with the terrorist government in Israel. They are the ones who suffer look anywhere in the world ask the question and the answer is that they are afraid.
It is made worst by the arrogance and the sneers of the extreme fanatic orthodox Jews who walking around as an mirror image of two thousand years ago and who never progressed to the reality and the modern world. They are the ones who would kill Christ again and do it over and over. They are also the ones who keep the USA and EU under the thump.


They are without out a doubt the most violent villains in the world, while playing the act of innocent little Jews towards to dopey Americans and the indoctrinated Europeans. Some people never learn, obvious. They without a sensible doubt killed Harriri in Beirut and managed with the help of the Americans and no doubt bags full of money to blame the very people who had every thing to loose by such an act. Then they managed again with the help of the Americans and the always full bags of money no doubt to install an international commission of people from the USA depended states who will that is also without a doubt do as they are told and will accuse the very people who did loose their influence because of it, while the real killers are standing by and laughing on the side, sneering at the Americans who are so easily to manipulate.


It can be no wonder that the Israeli government has no respect for the Americans and see them just as the extra muscle to protect them, a kind of bouncer to keep them out of trouble. Obvious is that they do not want a peace process they want land and more land. Now the Americans and Europe have abandoned the Palestinians it will be time for Israel to take over Lebanon, again with the help of a Hariri (the son) and the Americans (Hillary Clinton). With Hariri creating no doubt on American instruction as his visit to the USA and his refusal to talk to his own ministers is just more then a coincidence. The open aggression declaration of Hillary Clinton (who is putty in the Israeli hands) on the walk out of the spurred ministers was more proof of this. Next the French in the south of Lebanon will hand over the villages to Israel under the mention of an absurd story and the take over of Lebanon will be a fact. Hariri will be installed as the sole ruler under protection of the USA and Israel.


Israel obviously could not care less, and since the USA depended community will applaud the murder and violence the rest of the international community seems devoid of ideas as to what to do next other then playing the waiting game. Israel's sheer arrogance, brazen disrespect for the law, total disregard for the rest of the international community and perpetual insults to the UN are like the actions of maniac's who attacks a warehouse with automatic weapons, wreaking havoc and killing many civilian's and then give a statement on TV while smirking like the ruthless Rabbis of Israel and their orthodox supporters justifying what they just have done, declaring they would do it again and again. In any case the victims should not have been there. Just like the Palestinians should not be there.


And that is exactly the excuse that Israel and the Americans to support it, are given time after time. The terrorist actions, the international murders the land grab and the genocide it all has the permission of the Americans and Europe. It is a growing list of still more shocking massacres, to which the USA is turning a blind eye. The reason is an obvious one; the Jewish lobby/AIPAC has so much power in the USA via their many members of the congress, their bankers, and their supporters that they using the USA as a jumping board to create more aggression that is destroying America. The AIPAC does not care their takeover of the USA is their main program and they trample on anyone or any state that does not support them by simple turning the money tap off. And look at the result it has produced. The USA has to speak up for Israel, so much influence does Tel Aviv exert over Washington that that they the Americans like slaves obey without that they actual realise it.


Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon described the latest decision to demolish a hotel in Jerusalem to pave the way for another illegal settlement as serving "only to heighten tensions" adding that "it is deeply regrettable that growing international concern at the unilateral expansion of illegal Israeli settlements is not being heeded. Such actions seriously prejudice the possibility of a negotiated solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict". And that is all he has to say about it, he is not allowed to say anything more otherwise his master the USA would not support a re-election.


Calling for "substantive third party activity" in the peace process, as the UN Special Representative for the Middle East Peace Process, has done, is just to keep the Israelis sweet while the result will be as always, NILL. While the Americans and Europe are supporting the Israelis and only let some pre-arranged objection be placed in certain news media's, the rest of the international community tip toes around it not to make any waves. There for it is blatantly obvious that Israel will press ahead until there is no more Palestinian land left, and then they will take Jordanian as a bonus.


The bottom line is that neither Israel nor America respects international law and while it insist that others will upholds it. It simple by action admits that it does not go by international law and is willing to accept the consequences of its own law of the jungle. Man can ask of Hitler had a premonition of what would happen in the future, when he decided to take on the Jews during WW2.


Is it not strange that the American as a Christian nation support Israel in the believe that Christ would come back to Israel to judge. To Israel, to be killed again? On a cloud, to be shot down by Israeli fighters. Born again to be killed again either as a boy just because it is a boy or simple is shot. They support Israel while it was the Jews who insisted on killing Christ in the first place. Supporting the bankers who as money changers were thrown out of the Temple in Jerusalem as thieves. Man can ask with justification are the Americans mad, do they never learn, are they so obsessed by money that they will overlook the murder on Christ to get the money from the very people who's ancestors killed Christ.


Last week in Jerusalem we were looked at by the Israelis as tourist as something the dog had dropped, while the arrogance was dripping of their faces and their obstructions against the tourist were absurd. We were welcomed in other Middle East countries with a friendliness and open arms in contradiction in Israel we did not get open arms but a barrel pointed at us. Having experienced this we can now understand why so many countries in the world do not want Jews anymore. Although we do not condone or support it we can understand the German, Russian and British anger in the past against the Jews. What ever the Israelis are, they are certainly not open and friendly. However, neither are the drug gangs and the terrorist gangs and that is the way Israel behaves. They even indoctrinating their own youth man can ask how low you can sink, they complained about the Hitler jugend but what about their Israel youth dumb and dim.


If these Godless elements who created their own religion based on nothing then fantasy want to rule the world, find themselves better then any other non-Israeli person calling themselves Holy then let them do something themselves. Till now all they have is given by the Americans, without that there would be not a state of Israel, there would not be a hidden secret nuclear power uncontrolled and out of control, actual there would be chance of peace in the world.


All the problems in the world with terrorist are due to Israel, all the wars in the Middle East are due to Israel. (They were the ones who invented the WMD in Iraq with the knowledge that it did not existed) and they are doing the same with Iran again with a fantasy story, taken over by the Americans and their dependencies in Europe, this all with no proof. Israel's hierarchy show their abysmal ignorance and crass stupidity every time they accuse the SEMITIC Arab culture of anti-Semitism. They are the ant-Semitists and they know it but just playing the underdog, an action that did fool the Russians the Germans or the British in the past and it fools nobody now. What did happen to them in the far past was bad. What they are doing today is worse as they from experience should know better.

"Israel's" Palestinian War Crimes Trials will make the Nuremberg Trials look like a ticking of in a juvenile court.
(Revelation Chapter 2:9) "I know your works, tribulation, and property (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan". Quoting the Scriptures in an article like this we normally do not; however this is absolute accurate one.


Remember Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, he made the following statements about "9/11"; "We benefit from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq. Netanyahu reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favour." It sounded as of the Israeli were responsible for that atrocity or that they had created it for sympathy. America stayed silence, after all with an "ally" like that, who needs any enemies?


It's always the same old "blame the victim” followed by the stupid and endless lies from "Israel's" anti-Semites. The only "peace" these demonic freaks want is a piece of the entire Mid East, they certainly want North America, and if they could steal enough technology, they would even try to threaten to take over the universe too. Is it really any wonder why these demonic freaks have been kicked out of over 8o countries? And they still are pretending to be "poor victimized Jews.


Wealthy American and European Jews contribute an enormous amount of money to organizations like AIPAC, then they transfer this vast fund to the US and Europeans politicians and media conglomerates,(the money bags) the main reason why the European commissioners want every EU country to go bust. Their Jewish master and themselves will make a fortune out of the bond markets, in return, US politicians screw the Americans tax payers by supporting Israel and the media giants which are mostly owned and operated by the Jews indoctrinate the citizen with fantasy stories in a easy to belief form by ignoring and not mentioning a word about Israelis inhuman treatment of the Palestinians and the Israelis atrocities in Palestine altogether. You may ask, then what about Israelis? Well, they laugh all the way to the White House and Jerusalem. Palestinians are not the terrorists they are the real victims of Israel and the Americans.


The beginning of the Russian revolution it was done with Jewish money and it did cost over 35 million Christians their life, including the Tsar and his family. Just for the Israeli 35 million is more then 6 million, but do you hear the Christians going on and on about it? Ask you self who financed Hitler first via the Swiss banks, again the Jews, it was only when they did not wanted to finance any further under British pressure that Hitler was so p.ss.d off that he went for the destruction. Ask your self today who created the western world recession, again the Jews, and they are the ones who make the most of the money out of it. Christ was right thieving money changers. However do the American people see what is happening, no they don't. Their media produces the fantasy stories the population likes to hear, just as the German Media did in Hitler’s time, till it was too late.


The Christians of America are told that the Muslims are bad, the Muslims are different, and the Muslims are extreme.
However it is better to have an extreme Muslim friend then an Israeli Rabbi. Please note not a Jewish rabbi, but an Israeli rabbi what is something else altogether. The extreme Muslim will stay your friend but the Israeli rabbi will take your money and if not given freely will have you killed under the excuse that it was in self defence. It happens daily in Israel’s Palestine it is for those reasons why so many Palestinian, Bedouins, Christians, are jailed or simple are never to be seen again.

At a certain time in the future the world will wake up, too late!

=======================================================





14-01-2011



Is the bible a reliable historical document?



This is a question what is asked many times each day. The answer depends on who answers the question.

A religion leader will say it is.

A creationist will say, almost.

A believer will say some parts.

An atheist will say, no.

An average person will say it is a nice story.

Basically, No it is not a reliable historical document.

What does this mean for the Abrahamic religions? So far as we are aware it would not make the slightest of different, as even the most religion person would simple follow the lead of the religion leaders. This regardless of the bible is right or wrong.

There are too many points in the bible as a book, which are indeed completely wrong, do not add up or do not make any sense at all.

The bible constructed as a basic story by the learned Hebrews an odd 2500 years ago, basically to form the bases for a solid-state religion and discipline.

Reading the bible, it will very fast become obvious that many occurrences are taken over from the Old Babylonian way of thinking. Simple re-phrased in the way Hebrews would understand it and would be able to live by it.

There was nothing wrong with that attempt, and so far it the Hebrews concerned the history part was just history. It was the religion part that they used and lived by (partly). It was the created discipline that was needed to control the population and to keep them in control. This last did not always work very well.

It were the first popes who really messed up the whole concept, by taking the Hebrew history as the history of the Son of God. Nothing is further of the truth. There is even doubt by the Jews and by many others of Jesus was indeed a Jew.

Problem here was that the first leaders in the Church needed a story to hold the attention of their audience, like a good speaker in congress need to hold the attention of the audience to get the point he is making through.

It was the same with the early Christian Church they needed a pointer; hence Peter claimed that he had personally received the supreme pontifical power from Jesus which he had to transmit to his successors.

If that was the case then Jesus must be a very learned person as a son of a carpenter with no educational instructions other then the usual learning’s of the Hebrew religion. As by doing so in his instruction to Peter he must have known the world as it was in those days. However it was the second pope that made the first still existing alterations, this besides creating the first 15 Bishops.

The real Christian story was made and written at the First Council of Nicacea where 318 learned fathers created the Symbolum nicaenum.

This meeting had a similarity with the meeting an odd 1000 years earlier by the Hebrews. and had the same intention.
It did set-up the history of the Church along the lines of the Hebrew history,
this only done to present a better picture to the audiences in the churches. Christianity till that time had not much history themselves to impress the audiences.
It did created the form of religion and the discipline to control the churchgoers.

It was partly revised at the Niceno-contantinopolitan greed, were 150 fathers were in attendance.

So the question is the bible a reliable document gives an obvious answer it is not.

It is like the history of any Country any Tribe, it is made up out of father to son stories, alteration, adding’s and distortions.

It is not a wrong history or an inaccurate account, nor is it a misrepresentation of what really did happen, it is a history transferred over long period of time. Any story any history looses over times certain points and with loosing that the actual history is changed.
By the time that the history in completeness is written down the writer or writers are not aware what or which part are left in darkness.

There fore the bible is not an historical document, and certainly before 450 BC it was pure fantasy, put together, to have people to control, to obey and to create a religion what would be able to control.

============================================================

16-01-2011

We have seen over the years when exposed to reality the weaknesses of the creator’s theory, for the bewildering of suggestion, re-written and altered and re-written beginning of the bible.

However let us turn to that bible for more information. We Learn that the Great Assembly a two and a half thousand years ago in meeting to create a history and a religion for the Hebrew population, managed to fit together a series of patriarchal leaders dating back to the presumed Adam and Eve.

As God himself said he created man and man needed a woman so he created out of Adam a woman.

We also know that Eve had her first born son and said see I have a man from God.

We also know from the same bible that he had a brother and that this brother was brutally murdered by his eldest brother.

That brother was sent away. What the bible does not explain how it was possible that Cain suddenly found a wife. A wife that must have parents. If we presume that Cain and his wife were more or less of the same age take or give a couple of years, then the parents of his wife must be more or less giving or take a couple of years, been of the same age of Adam and Eve. If we know from the bible that God created Adam and Eve in adult form, and that there is in the bible not a word about other human creation, then we have to presume that those parents of the wife of Cain had followed to normal process of being born and raised to adulthood.

If that is the case and the bible does not give an explanation, then the parents of the wife of Cain also must have parents, who were born out of parents, who again were born out of parents.

As we also know that Cain build himself a city, and if we may presume that in that city were more people then only Cain, his wife and her parents, as we also know that, there were no cities build before 3500 BC then we must have a miracle of enormous proportions.

Here we have a man born out of Adam and Eve, who find himself a wife. If we for the example presume that this wife was the only female around. However, we know that tribal compounds around the time the Hebrews set as the time for Adam and Eve had several hundreds to several thousands of inhabitants.
Then we may presume on the bibles own instigation that at the time Cain found his wife, that there was not just his new found wife but at least an couple of hundreds humans more.

To put it simple, were the heck did they come from. The bible does not give an explanation.

Now we can do as the creationist do, count all that is written from genesis till the last word of revelations, if they disregards all what they cannot use and only use the parts they can fit, then maybe it would be possible to find an explanation. It is what they are doing to create an explanation as they do for other parts of the bible. After all the creationist have been proven to be better than everyone else to change, alter and re-write all they do not want or does not fit in their vision.

However, they in their eagerness to prove a point that does not exist, they forget that the Great Assembly did not know about John, Paul in fact they did not know any of the many writers of the new testament. Many of the writers of the New Testament also never have known the man Jesus.

Still they managed to tell us exactly as what he has said, and what he told them what we should do. Better still they received many of those massagers in their dreams. We all know that what you dream is not what does happen in reality, but is merely fantasy. Fantasy in relation of underlying wishful thinking or desires.

Then again you can make money out of fantasies, look as real writers such as Tolkien.

However let us go back to the beginning, in the time that God created all within six days.

What are we to make from that statement? We know now that there are creationists who have severe doubts about that creation story and that are what it is just a story. We have now already renowned creationist who casting doubt over the Hebrew Bereshit story, casting doubt over the word Bara meaning create, but that is now transformed into forming. We have others who say that the world creation must be seen over a much longer period.

They say that the Great Assembly only said 6 days and the 7th day as rest to make it clear to the people that they should be working 6 days but on the 7th day they could rest. In that contest the 6 days were done for the convenience of the people.

The creationist have made it themselves much more easier, if the old testament does not explain it then take selected phrases from the old and the new testament take the best suited parts and fix a likely version together. That is what is called creation, and the ones who are doing just that creationist.

After all it is not the bible that is central here; it is the word in it that must attract the masses.

In fact that story of Adam and Eve is so full of holes that it looks like an emmerthaler cheese.

However leave it to the creationist and they will find words, link them together with other word that are than linked again with complete different parts of the bible. That way they will find something to make the masses believe that what they are saying is correct. However to read those correct words they have to pay first.

By charging for the word and the explanation of the word itself becomes a sales object and therewith the object of the sales pitch maker, enter the creationist.

That Adam and Eve were not alone on Earth is sometimes regarded that we should read that Adam and Eve were the only ones in the Garden of Eden.

With that the suggestion is made that there outside the garden were more humans, hence that it was easy for Cain to find a wife.

The bible in his original Hebrew form however does not reveal this, nor is there any mention of it in real terms or by suggestion.

That God was not alone is also clearly stated in the bible, so was it God who did the creating or did he had his many sons do the work.

The Creationist will us have to believe that those sons were angels, not real sons. This however contradicts again the bible. The bible clearly states that the sons of God came down to earth to take the women for themselves. No ghosts here as is so many time suggested, no divine sons of heaven, no spirits,
Just sons who wanted a woman and simple took them.

Maybe it was the Giants who were on earth that were the angels or the opposites of God.

It will be obvious that the creationist needed something to scare the new believers to keep them believing. And there it was the Devil!

Here they throw in their own figural windows.
God is all-powerful and good.

He is either all-powerful or just a normal deity.

If he is all-powerful then there can be no challenge to him, being all-powerful.

If he is a normal deity such as in the Gilgamesh epic, then of course there is the possibility of other deities wanting to have part in everything.

Nowhere in the Old Testament is the mention of angels; the first salesman of Christianity invented them. The Old Testament speaks about sons of God in Genesis, in Job; it speaks of archangels in Daniel, the book of Enoch, but not in Job.

It is fashion to say that in Isaiah, made a statement of: how are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer.
However this is a creationist fabrication to attract attention.
In Job there is nothing about Lucifer or angels it is about the sons of God.

The line: How are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer.
Does not exist! Lucifer as name was for the first time used in the 4th century AD.

The line in reality as penned down, figural speaking, at the Great Assembly was Morning Star. It is also not about an angel/archangel or Son of God. It was about Babylon were the king was a mighty conquer who had fallen from power, It is he who is referred to as son of the morning, how you are cut down to the ground, you who conquered the nations, you said that your power would make you ascent to heaven above the throne of God.

God did certainly not explain that Lucifer had a throne. There was no Lucifer. However the king of Babylon had a throne and he was a leader with authority.
He did rose to great height, thought he was greater then God but never said he wanted to overthrow God.
This again is a creationist fantasy to make the story fit their purpose.

It is a kind of obtaining money with menace.

The fantasy of the Old Testament regarding Lucifer can be swiped into the rubbish bin, as it never existed.

The New Testament is nothing else then stories, which did not happen and are based around a figure called Jesus in the Latin translation.

There is no authentic evidence present of the existence of Jesus, but we are willing to believe that such a figure did have walked the streets in Jerusalem.

Most of the writings of the saints are done after they died. Therefore we need to take the stories of the New Testament with a pinch of salt, a large pinch.

If studied the Popes from the beginning then it will be become very clear that they were responsible for the stories, either by them selves or instructed by others.

All the stories were made so that they corresponded with the stories in the Old Testament.
And let us be clear, it made the popes and their churches a fortune.

Is the creationist then not right? In principle they are right they are the creationist who recreating the bible to suit their purpose. Reality is gone and fantasy has taken over the word of God is changed in Jesus is the word. The king of Babylon is elevated to something called Lucifer, although there is no Lucifer in the Old Testament.
The joy of the sons of God in Job is created as the angels of joy before the creation. We do realize that the story had to be sold to the masses and that this story had to be as exciting and acceptable as possible.
Many worldwide renowned writers are using the same concept and like the creationist story making lots of money out of it.

Who need honesty, if you have a creationist nearby? And that all for making a couple of dollars more.
And to stay with the original point. If God had so many sons, which one was Jesus?
If we let the creationist go on then in an other 20 or 30th years the bible will be completely a different book.

Earth will have been in existence for million of years the sons of God were dwelling on it and created many others. And Adam and Eve were only mentioned because they were appointed to the Garden of Eden.

Consider this if you want to be taken in and willing to part with your money, If God is all powerful and good why was and is he than willing to let yet another fantasy of the creationist the devil/Satan rule the earth. This contradict the story, again he is either all-powerful or good, or has limited power and the goodness is gone to the devil.
We have to realize that written records of this geneses story is only less then 2500 old. There are some written scrolls and tablets from before that but they can be explained as well to the Hebrews as to any other tribe living in the Fertile Crescent.

Creationists will you to believe that the records are over 5000 years old. Do not believe that. If you ask for proof they show you the bible. Their bible in a new version unrecognisable from the original, near completely different than the Hebrew original scrolls.

Still there is the question of the Angels. Angels are an invention of the Christian Church, they needed Good and Evil. Therefore they created Lucifer and the angels, and then they changed Lucifer into Satan and Satan into the Devil. Nowhere in the original bible is there a mention that angels who were only created in the New Testament were already on earth before Adam and Eve. To make them and gave them and place in the bible they simple created them in the New Testament. There is no proof of any of it. Just as there is no proof of the Hobbits out of the Lord of the Rings.

Most creationists are masters of fiction and fantasies. In their attempt to sell and to make belief they are willing to re-write, to distort and to alter anything what is needed.

What they do realize is that they slowly sitting with egg on their faces, as it becomes more and obvious the evolutionists having a point. This not based on fantasy and re-written books but on search and research, on estimates and clear-cut facts.

Hence we see that more and more creationist now extending the earth further. It does happen sly and almost invisible. But their latest statements do show clearly that there was now a clear-cut earth far before Adam and Eve.

It will be only a matter of time when they will launch their new chapter of the explanation of the dinosaurs. Just wait for it. The bible will be re-written.
Statements of the church and the saints will be pulled apart and fit together again to get the proof they need to present as a part of the bible and their explanations.

The book of genesis has fallen apart under scrutiny of the facts. It is a curiosity that the creationist is willing to change the bible, change reality just to present it as a believe. It is obvious that they do not belief it themselves. They would not alter the original for a fantasy.

There are souls who do not understand the sudden change between reptiles and mammals, we simple say back to school and this time, learn. See what impact a meteor can have when plunged into earth.

So what is the purpose of the creationists besides earning money, in short more money.
If there was no money to be received they would not bother.

The Abrahamic religions having all one God, they using the same bible and the same originality.

They all offer, if we are good in place in heaven, were ever that may be, or a place in hell, were ever that may be. In fact and reality it is meaningless, purposeless, it is also immoral and emotional torture.

It is based on a simple book written in complete form after the beginning of the New Testament, which it self was written and re-written altered and re-written many times from the 3rd century AD.

God is attributed in the old and new testament an series of hair raising cruelties, which makes the cruelties of the likes like Attila, Stalin, poll pot and Hitler tiny. As all the four mentioned names, God also had a good reason for going on a killing spray.

All four mentioned did not like certain people, regardless why. God was more direct; he did not like what they are doing. What makes however, the Abrahamic God more evil was that not only he wanted the people dead. He wanted everything dead regardless, humans, animals and flora. Not a quick dead but a slow drowning dead.

Is that an act of a God who is all-powerful and good?
Or was it an act of his opponent who wanted to destroy all that God had created? In both the answer must be the same, it certainly was not an action or reaction of an all powerful and good one.

That evil and gruel action makes all what he does later irrelevant, as he could do it again, a kind of psycho one and two. It does explain his silly actions in the Garden of Eden. First he create a beautiful garden, he placed two special created people in there, than suddenly he places all kind of restrictions, WHY? Again it proof that we must have severe doubts about his being good, a good God would not place a destructive burden upon them.

We have to realize that it here concerns a story, not a reality. The flood in reality never existed, although frantic searches were and are made millions wasted, while never a shred of evidence was/is found.

Creationists create, but then again it their duty to create.
We have reactions seen as that of Hugh Ross as he gives a reaction on the bibles account of recreation.
'' Here was a journal-like record of the earth’s initial conditions'' he said. Sorry to say, but this way over the top as there is no journal like record of the earths conditions. This salesman terms is called over selling. The fact is that there is no record at all of the condition of earth at that time. We have simple to take it as a to eager over enthusiastic writer who wanted to make somewhere an impression and decided to write a longer piece the first chapter of genesis is long. Probably to impress. To the more down to earth, it is bizarre. and ultimately incorrect.

What did happen if it did happen, in large lines it was simple the original story of the creation as was held by most of the tribes in the Fertile Crescent.

Till the Great Assembly there was not much different between them, even in the times of the Kings the majority of the tribes believed in Ba'al as the main God. The Great Assembly changed this. They streamlined the creation story, made it smooth and easy understandable and lined it with one God only.

Now they had the history they needed, the creation they wanted, and the religion to control the people.

However till that great Assembly meeting there was no different between the Hebrew and the Sumerian/Babylonian account of the creation. Names and situation did differ following the tide of power changes. However, clear-cut it was basically the same story.

It was only after that Great Assembly meeting, that they had only one God who created the world by his own command. Before that it was simple a copy of the Sumerian story. Genesis only arrived at the Great Assembly meeting. Not before.

The facts remain, the Old Testament until that great Assembly meeting was simple a reflection of the Sumerian and Babylonian folks tales. Different only are visible after that meeting, after they had streamlined the story, after they had officially created the one God. The genesis story only starts from that time.

We do realize that to sell a story you need a story, and the bible is a just as good story as, for example the Lord of the Rings.

However, they changed it, for the sake of gain; the story is used to indoctrinate people, to scare people, to kill people, to demand money from people, not directly but via the creation of curiosity. For that curiosity you have to pay.

Let us be clear, from day one that was the purpose, which is why the whole of the history is created, simple to make money. The popes knew what they were doing. They like the creationist of today, changed, re-wrote a changed it again added and removed parts till they had the smooth running story, which would sell, and selling it did. The riches of the churches are well known and clearly visible.

What is not known and not visible is the history of the benefit for the believers. If there are any benefits.

The old saying the biggest crooks sitting on the front benches of the church, is unfortunate to many times a proven reality. The loudest of screamers to praise God are also the most notorious killer’s maybe not by them selves but in name of them.

For recent history see the war in Iraq, started as a murdering strategy under the heading of the infamous weapons of mass destruction. This fantasy story came from Israel, and turned out to be a lie and not the first one. And then we are to believe the writings of the very people who deliberate were telling a lie. It cast even more doubts.

The Churches and the creationists can alter, add, change, re-write and change again, but it cannot make the fact that the bible is a simple folk’s story, a myth.

If the creationist just for one moment stopped to sift through every thing the scientist does, stopped just for one moment with altering and re-writing to bible and used that time to investigate the Hebrew Myth maybe than just maybe there could be proof being shown or the lack of proof being shown.

Till this moment they are making a fool of themselves by constant attacking the scientists. While their attention should in looking for real clear cut evidence of geneses. As till this moment there is none.

In the mean time think of God as the First clause, and take it from there.

============================================================

18-01-2011

Slowly moving forwards to total obedience of the world outside Europe, the unselected commissars of the European polit burro have, outwards obvious unaware decided to place the borders of handing Europe over to the one who pay's most, to them.
Not satisfied with emptying the coffers of the Eu treasury, for their own benefit explained as for the benefit of the commissars of the EU. They now have found a way to enlarge the benefits by doing deals. The encouragement of the Bonds market for any European country they can force, although they call it persuasion, into taking the backhanders of the EU banking system, which they call emergency bail out. As we have seen those bail outs are not needed if they did not interfere and let the countries deal with their own finances.



After all they have to call it something, they have already many years of problems with the EU finance books as they are not able to explain the gaps in the payments and the many, many irregularities, which they call not yet supplied figures. Then again if you look at the very people who are commissars of the EU whereas by some of them with knowledge of criminal contacts in their circle of friends, always ex friends as they say, just in case someone is asking questions. However, in the case of this as an example Neely Smith one of the many vice presidents of the EU as they do not have one but many vice presidents as a vice president gets paid more then just a commissar, and more money silence many mouths.



They had already their fingers firmly stuck into the bonds market by forcing states such as Ireland to take a handout from the EU while they in reality did not need it. They tried and still try to do the same with Portugal as the profit of the bonds market is their first priority not the well-being of the EU. The EU is in fact not of their concern at all just an easy relentless income for doing almost nothing then to create one problem after another for the EU members, which they then solve so that they can cash in one more.



Countries like Ireland and England could do much better if they were not shackled to the EU, but were just a trade partner. However were the previous government of England kept the EU on a certain distant, the new government of Premier Cameron has now tied themselves for ever to the EU. It needs a new government in Ireland and England with back power and not interested in the moneybags of the EU for compensation to cut the strings from the politics of the EU. Certain anti-European small parties have no real influence on the EU or countries politic, take for example the England UKIP a small party with slogans against the EU, however besides all their rhetoric if real EU questions need to be tackled than they are nowhere to be seen.



The pound would be a perfect buffer between the Euro and the Yuan after the dollar is laid to rest. Let the EU explain and give a clarification from the European Commission on a calendar for students in Europe on which all Christian holidays are missing. The most important days of all other religions are mentioned and well explained but of the Christian dates no trace. We tried to ask them this last week but were more or less told to mind our own business, we also asked the UK in depended party, but they were deafened silence on that subject. In Europe some Christian parties also have asked the same question and had no reply. This is an incredible blunder an absurdity that can be expected by a third rate small business but would not be possible by the EU unless sanctioned by the commissars of the EU. In the light of this man can ask themselves and wonder what agenda the European Commissars have really in mind.



That it is not a mistake is obvious the question is what is behind it. After all from the commissars you can expect anything, look at their attempts to blame the Russians for the start of WW2, while it was England that declared the war to Germany, mainly in the hope of a quick victory, their knowledge was that Germany was unprotected, while the main reason was to get hold of the German colonies in Africa. What we like to know is how the Commissars intend to implement the Judeo-Christian tradition which is for centuries the basis of the Christian traditions in Europe. Maybe the commissars are preparing the EU to be integrated into the Muslim, Jewish or Buddhist world and to hell with Christianity.



In Germany and the Netherlands the Christian parties have already more then 25% of their members as Muslims, not to mention the Jews and the Buddhist who are members. However, Europe is still primarily a Judeo-Christian culture. You may expect from the European Commissars that they watch over what is going on even if they obvious are not interested and unselected under an unselected president. They should pay more attention to the Youth of Europe and not trying to transfer the wrong image and information to the youth of Europe. The 3 million plus calendars are distributed to 20,000 plus high schools. The cost was over 5 million euros. The European Commissars have admitted that there could be possible a fairly serious error. Do they really? The commissar’s vision on the world does make you wonder.



It is obvious that the attempt is that the younger generation of Europe must be brainwashed or otherwise they will not work with the EU. Changing history, changing the rules, ignoring Europe’s heritage is their aim so that in that way they can get more and more countries under their wing and fill their money bags. Of their attempt will work will be only known in another 50 years, if not then they have shot themselves in the foot.



It is time that the EU is re-organised. A proper parliament, a proper council of ministers elected, a president elected by the people. Out have to go the many commissars, the many vice presidents and the also many presidents. All of them are friends who are given friends a job and then stick together to keep the jobs for them selves. Have no responsibility to anyone, can do what they want as the other commissars will protect them to keep the EU polit burro going.


Will the EU change? We doubt it the commissars are making simple to much money, the books are checked but never approved because of the to many irregularities in it. There is nobody who can control those spending by the EU commissars, the governments it self are tied closely to the commissaries, to be able to make any changed or to force any changes. The heads of state are elected and therefore have to be elected, that makes them a symbol in the eye of the voters. The commissars do not have that problem they can do what they want when they want it and how they want it. Most heads of state hope that if they are not elected anymore can be appointed to be a commissar and the money will be coming rolling in.



It is about time that the commissars are joining the EU as supporting members instead of pocket filling outsiders, politicians of countries who in reality should be on the compost heap but are saved because they are moved as a favour into the circle of commissars to pump up their income and have an good old day, or as in the case of the mentioned Neely Smit till they drop dead. After all it is not there money that they are spending it is the money of the dopey voters and who cares about them. The voters are there to supply the endless stream of money and that is all. Once in a while they are allowed to vote for the European parliament. That parliament is just a nice little milk cow without any voice or decision rights. They can decide and the commissars are simple ignoring it. They should be ashamed, however being a commissar means that basically and in principle you do not have any shame or principles.



Nothing that the commissars do is accidental or done by error you can count on that. Bank on that the missing Christian data's are not an error, but a deliberate omission, in line with the commissars principle that all is allowed if it brings in the money for them. They have clearly the destruction of the identity of the EU countries and the Islamic conversion of Europe in mind. It probably went like this, someone offered money if the Christian data's would be forgotten on the students calendars. Accounting is something known for the citizen of Europe but not for the commissars, they talk of transparency but in reality they pulling down the blinds and the wool over everyone’s eyes.



Transparency, but that is only an other word for financial corruption and waste. As a political entity, the EU stinks to high heaven the smell coming from the swamp they call the commissariat. They wasting every ones money and time but if one of the member states uses common sense then they are threatened with high financial penalties. Not that there is a reason for the penalties after all a country can do what they think is in the interest of the country. However that is not the case in the eyes of the commissars, they smell money, so a penalty it is. The countries do pay, however if they would not there is nothing what the commissar's can do, if they would they could trigger the end of the EU. On this moment England is the only country in the EU that really adheres to the rules however absurd. The rest of the EU simple stick up two fingers.



Then again in England all what they do is sticking to the sometimes more then absurd rules, some hundreds of years old. That people can be killed, legal systems are turned upside down, do they care? Of course they don't so long they get paid nothing matters they are the real evil of this world. Take this for an example, in all countries a burglary is a simple burglary. However in England there is not such a thing as a straight forward burglary, there it is illegal entering, breaking and entering, using force to enter, damaging goods, taking goods without permission of the owner, endangering the lives of the owners, even if those are thousands of miles away (they could have been there), entering the grounds without the owners permission. That is what in other countries is called a simple burglary. It is therefore no wonder that if the EU commissar's invent something it is ignored in Europe but instantly accepted in England.


The Anti-Christ is the worst night mare people can think of, however, believe us the Anti-Christ is a little pussycat compared with the EU commissar's. With the Anti-Christ the world as a whole has a change, with the EU commissars nobody has any change. All we can hope for that God has mercy on us. Then again we would not be surprised if that moment in time would come the commissars would be seen being there already attempting to make a money spinning deal with him.

=============================================================

20-01-2011

Outsiders see Buddhism as a movement faith of peace and meditation.

Just as the Christian and Judaic religion they have been told Thou shall not Kill. Or as the first precept states: In undertake to refrain from taking life. However just as the Christians and the Judaic religion they broke that command time after time.

The different being that the Christian and the Judaic religion were proud on their killings and called it a glorious wins, a triumph. The Buddhist calls it a sad occasion to have to kill, and then goes on killing till they have reached were they were aiming for.
Where the Christian and the Judaic religions will celebrate their wins forever and ever, the Buddhist will say, we are aware of the suffering caused by the destruction of life. We are committed to cultivate compassion and learn ways to protect the lives of people, animals, plants and minerals. Therefore we are determed not to kill, or help others to kill, and not to condone any act of killing in the world, in thinking, and in the way of life.

It does not stop them for creating situations in which many are killed and harmed. However as Buddhism is a Faith a statement of a belief, one totally focuses on personal salvation. As such it is solely based on behaviours that promote actions that encourage salvation.

Buddhism, what is in fact an extension with new adding’s of the Vedic Religion. It took over many of the concepts of the Vedic Religion under which the concept of Karma. Karma in simple form means that all actions have consequences, negative or positive.

Killing for example is negative and too many negatives bring negative consequences in future reincarnation. In short they all will aim for the Nirvana or at least a human return. This is the main reason that they are in words against killings it can be fatal to their aims.

It will be obvious, that the aim not to kill or to advice not to kill is aimed at their own salvation and therefore central to the practice of that Faith.

The so many times over and over pressed story that Buddhists are against war is in simple terms not true.
The Mahayana Buddhism doctrine has always served as a base for war.

Look at China were the belief led to various rebellions attacks in favour of the countries communities. Many Buddhist cults from time to time rebelled against any ruling dynasty. Look at Japan, Buddhism accepted and trained the samurai warrior. They manipulated political situation and had the hand in violent confrontations among competing sects.
Maybe their first rule may be to refrain from killings themselves, but activating killings by others will not hold them back. The emperors such as Harsha of Kanauj and Dharmapala of Binhar and Bengal, they waged many of year’s simple for the expansion, despite of their status as Buddhists. Look at Ceylon now, Buddhists fighting against Buddhists.
No talking there about negative or positive Karma.

It is save to say that although the Buddhist say that there is no justification for war in the Buddhist teachings, they do support and have supported strategic situations to reap the benefits.

For this look as an example to Burma and Tibet, look at Sri Lanka were the Buddhists are actively involved.
The Buddhist morality is based on certain principles, not on rules.

The principles as they see it are those as in the precepts and the Four Immeasurable. If they have to violate the principles then that is regrettable as it can be negative for Karma. However it is not positive to stand aside while people are maimed and killed. So the principle of being peaceful can be and only will be stand if it suits the Buddhist.

If we take this further does it also means that the principle of not killing only stands if it suits the Buddhist, after all it is the duty of a Buddhist to find all possible ways to solve an problem, before the weapon is taken up. It does mean that in principle the Buddhist have the same principles as any other person on the world. This regardless of what kind of Religion that person belongs to.

They all prefer peace; they all will kill if needed.

This does not affect their Karma, as they do not do the killings themselves. They are not responsible for other who do the killing accidental or by purpose. They are responsible for their own Karma. It has nothing to do with the instigator. It must be seen, as with the samurai in Japan it was not the teaching from Buddha that created the samurai. The Buddhists were the instigators for the rise and creation of the samurai.

Again the principle is the same, the Buddhist not himself does the actions to the killing they only instigate. Therefore, their Karma stays in positive, while the result of their actions is negative for others. The actions of the Dalai Lama are a prime example of this principle.
Instigate actions; promote actions but stay out of the action himself directly. His Karma stays positive his Nirvana guaranteed.

To make it to understand, we do not judge the Tibet question. The Buddhist can have the fullest of right on their side, and without offering a judgment they probably have. We only want to show that Buddhists are people just as we all are.

The fact that prefers to have the killing done by someone else to keep their Karma in tact is what set them aside. Not as peaceful Buddhists, but as masters of delegating the killing.

=============================================================

22-0102011

The western world seems to have developed a system in which they decide who they want to rule a country, any country. They decide who they like and who they do not like. To say it in simpler words, those who do not obey them and those who are willing to obey them. We have seen that with the elections in Iran, Russia and now Belarus. If their man is not elected then the street riots are organised by the so-called opposition with Western world support, so that they can blame police brutality against the one whom actual did win. It is what they call democracy.

The president of Belarus was installed during a ceremony at the parlays in Minsk. The so-called democratic countries of the Western world or to put it an other way the countries that has to obey the USA or risk their anger will not be there.
The EU, one of the least democratic of authorities in the world say it will be not there because the election was not fair. Never mind that the people who know said it was, the Western world candidate did not win and therefore it was not fair.

Never mind that the ones who are leading the EU and are in charge of the EU are not elected at all, have no responsibility to anyone, not even to their own unselected friends. Never mind that they are ripping of the people of the EU in such a way that for many years the accounted refuse to approve the accounts. They are ripping of the EU at a rate so high that it is impossible for the citizen of the EU to pay for it.

However, this are the people who claim that an proper election is or is not fair, rather rich coming from people who roaming of the system and are not elected at all, just appointed by friend or by friends of friends. In fact the EU commissioners are nothing else in the face of the word democracy, a joke. Ok a bad joke but still a joke.

We have no opinion of the election was fair as most of the observers said or not fair as a handful Western observers a saying.

As they have done with Iran and as they have tried to do with Russia they want sanctions against Minsk as punishment for the actions against the by the EU organised riots and the many arrests for violence and destructions. Never mind that sanctions only work when every country enforce them, and as we have seen before the by the western countries enforced sanctions never work. In the long term they will work against them as the USA has found out and the EU is starting to find out in short they losing friends. In more understandable terms the Western world with a total of 800 million people against the rest of the world with 5.5 billion people.

The only part that has given the Western Countries the upper hand so far is that they are threatened the rest of the world with nuclear weapons if they do not do what they want. The USA has already more then 100 times threatened countries with a nuclear attack if they do not obey, and Israel is catching up fast. However, times are changing the treat of the Western world the USA and Israel are counter acted on by other countries that slowly are catching up.

The sanctions are coming from the EU, who is merely angry that Belarus is refusing the EU unselected authority and therefore want the Belarus President and his staff refusing to travel, an action that is again a bad joke it does not work and it makes Belarus more anti EU, and that could have oil and gas problems for the EU. Obvious is that the warlords of the USA will support the EU. Although also obvious is that the majority of the USA has no clue if you ask them, where Belarus is.

What the EU refuses to accept is that the President of Belarus was elected with an absolute majority, the opposition claimed together with the EU observers fraud, however they till this moment have failed to point out any fraud concerning the election. Merely they say that the president had more publicity then as they had. In that case the last elections in the UK must be fraud as well as the opposition had all the publicity organised from the United States in favour of them and the sitting government all the publicity against them. Not that in the UK the opposition won the election they did not they managed to grab the government seat by persuading a turncoat party to join them. In the total votes the Labour government won by 68 percent. However due to the first past the pole electorate system in the UK, the conservatives could win more seats. A similar situation we had in the USA were Bush the first time was elected on a minority vote but due to his fathers friends was appointed as president.

At least they were elected and that is more than can be said from the EU were the election of the Authority is non-existing simple a question of friends giving other friends a job. They all are made because of the extra earnings a vice president or a president. In the EU democracy is just a word not a reality. Even the protests organised by the opposition in Belarus with the approval of the EU cannot take away that they are interfering in an other countries politic.

The president is seen by the EU as the last dictator of Europe. Actual this is an absurdity, The Eu president and his commissioners are thousand times more dictatorial and longer in power then the Belarus president. The problem for the EU is that Belarus does not accept the dictatorial unselected regime of the EU, and that is were the problem is. The EU and the Western world are behaving themselves as spoilt little children, school bullies, who accept the Nazi state of Latvia and Lithuania and their press suppression but are angry because their plan to make from Belarus an EU state under control of the unselected authority failed.

These are the same people who are screaming that democracy must prevail, and then supporting Israel in genocide on the Palestinians. Supporting Georgia who tried to do the same with South Ossetia, and are the same EU that slowly is sliding in a financial freefall. The bond market has a field day in the EU, money actual lays on the street for them to collect every time they tell the unselected authority which country they will have bankrupted next, while they are cashing in.

It is obvious that the EU have falling in the same trap as the USA, and try to get an hold by intimidating countries and threatening them in the hope that they actual will fall in the USA/EU line. If they however refusing then they are dictators and their elections are a fraud.

What they actual do is telling the rest of the world, we are a bunch of failures that is trying to pretend that all is well. For their wallets it is, for the citizen it is a disaster in every form.

============================================================

24-01-2011

We are told time after time that it is not really fair to criticise the state of Israel for the action they take. It is always added that it is because it is a Jewish state and that the state will have the right to defend them. This is a hollow excuse and formulation. There is critic on Yemen, that is not because it is a Muslim state but because of the lack of progress against certain elements of the society. There is increasing critic on the United States, not because it is a Christian state, but because they have a policy of if it moves kill it regardless and ask questions later.



There is critic on Iran as a Muslim state but that is only because the Western world does not want Iran to have the same facilities as they have for over 60 years. And because Iran does not have those facilities they are called primitive.



The critic on the state of Israel is because of their inhuman actions, their complete ignorance of the UN rules, their random killing, and theft from other countries, there assassinations worldwide. This all has nothing to do with being Jewish. It has nothing to do with being a Jewish state. Jewish is used by the Israel state as an excuse as a fall back to WW2 times, their main excuse. However it all has nothing to do with being Jewish. The state of Israel is controlled by extremist from all sites, the Zionists, the extreme orthodox, the bouncers from Russia. The honourable Jewish leaders out the times of Mosje Dayan and Golda Meir are gone a long time ago.A silly reply on a question last week gave as answer, "The state of




Israel has made mistakes, so have many other countries but they do not have their backs to the wall and they are not Jewish". This is of course a statement what is laughable if it was not so serious. It has nothing to do with being Jewish. Being Roman Catholic does not mean your state is the state of Italy home of the Roman Catholic Church. Being Buddhist does not mean they all have to live now in India. Being Jewish does not mean that we are Israeli. Christianity, Islam, Jews, Buddhists they are all religions. There are Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and the Jewish states but those states have no relationship with the religions elsewhere in the world.



However as a result of the Israeli actions in their country as well their actions and many wars in other countries are now affecting the whole world at this moment. Their illegal actions, their constant lies, their constant aggression have saddled the world with terrorist phenomena we did not had before. The Jews as inhabitants of Israel are by most countries in the world despised. The only reason Israel has a seat in the UN still is due to the constant effort and protection from the United States, the UK and Canada. Now they are making the south of Israel mainly on stolen land a nuclear power house where they still not allow the inspections on the facilities which they demand for Iran.



There are only 7 million Israelis in a country they were given after was taken from the original inhabitants and still is taken. The reason is the Zionist movement who controls most Western countries finance, they were the lever that was and issued by again the United States, the UK and Canada to install the Israeli state. They created the world wide terrorism as every action has a reaction.



The Israeli commandos killed nine supporters of Gaza on board of a Turkey's ship in International waters. This while the ship was not a danger to the State of Israel and therefore the little children cry of the Israeli's "We have to defend ourselves" does not apply here. They investigated themselves and obvious they found that they were right to hijack a foreign ship in International waters and killed nine in the process. Absurd? Yes it most certainly is, but do we hear comments from the Western World, no we don’t they as always support the Israeli terrorist actions. Then again if the Israeli's would sh.t on their shoes they would still say "thank you can we have some more". If the Western world accepts this kind of investigations why in heavens name they started the Nurnberg Process? It would have been much easier to let the Nazi's investigate their own killings, the result would be the same as in the Israeli investigation, and they would be innocent. They had to take the action to defend them.



The problem is that Israel slowly becomes a worldwide embarrassment. Let make it clear not the Jews, which is a religion, no the Israeli are the embarrassment. They have nothing in common with the Jewish religion behind they are hiding as an excuse, they are simple terrorists supported by the Western world. They as the state of Israel have broken every rule laid down by YWH; they have disobeyed every law given to them by YWH. They simple do what the state of Israel has done since the time they were first acting as a state thousands of years ago the were at war against every neighbour, and if there were no neighbours against themselves. They have destroyed themselves from within. They are destroying themselves at this moment from within. From the twelve tribes then there is only a small mixture of two tribes left and it is obvious they have nothing learned from their history.



However, what the Israeli Government is doing is a complete fraud, well no change here then man can say, they present their case as of the whole of the Jewish religion support their actions. Well they do not. However, their is a small but ruthless and powerful money wise group in the USA who direct the USA government in the wrong direction. This direction is a world wide war. This would benefit the USA based Jews as they control the money and in an intensive war there is a need for more weapons and later more repairs and re-building materials and that all cost money the money they will supply against a nice repayment clause and added interest. They cannot loose, the Western world can, the economy can, no wonder those Jews were called two thousand years ago by Jesus, thieves and robbers, and they are earning their name today.

It is time that the state of Israel gets the same treatment as other countries receive if they break the UN rules, sanctions. On this moment in time a small terrorist state of 7 million habitants our holding 6.5 billion people to ransom. The Jewish people in the world live by the rules and laws given by YWH. The state of Israel and that group in the United States do not they just pretend, if they even know that those laws exist. The Jews in the world should rise up make a stand and declare that the actions of Israel are not the actions of the ones who respect the Jewish beliefs. The actions of the powerful group in the United States and the Israeli government are the actions of aggression, greed and violence direct launched against the rules and laws as given by JWH.



The land in Israel was given to the Jews by YWH. The present situation is that a band of people calling themselves Jews because it fit their purpose and are supported by extreme orthodox and Zionist Jews have in fact nothing to do with the Jewish religion at all. Their actions are the same as that of the German actions in WW2 and the Muslim extremist actions at present. By using Jewish as a pre-fact to the state of Israel the insult every real Jewish believer in the world.



The USA meanwhile should stop drinking tea and show that they are still real man and woman alive in the United States and that they are not all tea drinkers and Sarah Palin admirers and wimps. Then again to many of the tea drinkers are descended of the tens of thousands of Nazi’s the Americans after the war immigrated to the USA because of their knowledge. Those lost souls of the Third Reich no doubt want to see an fourth Reich in the USA. It is sad to say tea drinkers or not their aggression against the ones who cannot defend themselves is still there. Maybe they could alter the tea for something else, maybe some extra cream with a twist?

=============================================================

26-01-2011

It would surprise no one that China vowed to increase efforts to combat inflation while maintaining "stable and relatively fast" economic growth, after the inflation did rise to 5.1 percent.
"The priority is to actively and properly handle the relations between maintaining steady and relatively fast economic growth, economic restructuring and managing inflation expectations," a statement said which was released after Central Economic Work Conference. The conference also reaffirmed the recently introduced "prudent" monetary and pro-active fiscal policy for 2011.



But to meet the new monetary policy target, policymakers must strictly implement it, Western analysts warned.
A surplus of market liquidity is a major contributor to inflation, those analysts agreed. New Yuan lending - a key indicator of liquidity - reached the target set already and is expected to exceed it. The conference made it clear that liquidity will be "well managed" next year and put a priority on "stabilizing overall price levels".
The expectation is that the consumer price index will drop below 5% in February.
Zhang Xiaojing economist at the Academy of Social Sciences said the task would be daunting, even if prices do fall they tend to get up again. The whole of the liquidity is too complicated as it is not only relying on domestic factors but also on international markets.



It is the volatile situation in the USA and EU that can alter the outcome of the whole liquidity process. The USA quantitative easing has led to increased liquidity in the market, and much of this capital has targeted China. The FR chair said that the Fed could end up increasing its purchase of US government bonds if the economy fails to improve, sparking a concern of a new round of quantitative easing. To control liquidity, the China policymakers must meet the target set by the central government. An economist at the State Council's Development Research Centre and central bank adviser said earlier that the whole-year target for new Yuan loans should be 7.1 trillion Yuan ($1.07 trillion). Other economists predicted it could be between 6.5 trillion and 7.4 trillion Yuan.



It will be obvious that the target will be meaningless unless it can be ensure that it will not be crossed, financial institutions have used in the past various methods to avoid the regulations. This to make sure that loans are not counted in lending statistics. However rate hikes cannot be ruled out as China has been entering an interest rate cycle which will force the rates to be increased drastically. Therefore the risk of rising inflation in the first half of the year will remain. Unknown yet how they intend to tackle this inflation if it does occur as it could have unexpected consequences.



It has made the Chinese government extremely cautious on interest rates and is concerned about the risk of overdoing it, which, if coupled with other shocks, could induce a drastic anticlimax. It simple means that China has to tightening the monetary supply as one aspect of the monetary policy. Obvious is that if there would be a drastic economic slowdown the Chinese government would do well to shift their policy to more favourable measures to up the economy. The main problem will be the gap between the people’s income and the improvements of the livelihood of the people without creating a goods basic value increase. Basically it means that they need to promote the transformation of the economic development pattern while at the same time maintaining a stable and comparatively growing of the economy.



This all in all means the tasks from previous years will be adhered too, so that the macro-regulation ensures a stable and fast growing economy within a well defined structure which can be adjusted when needed. It will enhance
Quality and efficiency of economic growth, boost rural development momentum, deepen reform and opening it up. It needs to enhance the momentum and vigour of economic growth, promote a stable increase in exports, and improve people's living standards while maintaining a social stability.



It will be an interesting year for China and for the Chinese population.

===============================================================


28-01-2011

The financial crisis has triggered a wave of National debt crises. While the attention is currently mainly on the financial situation in Greece and Ireland and Portugal with Spain in the back ground it means that the majority of the industrialized world is under penalty reform. Required are not only spending cuts, but more stringent new fiscal laws. As the model to emulate Germany's fledgling debt brake. It covers not only the federal government, but also to the Bundes countries. However, is there any chance that this will work?



For the new rules regarding fiscal discipline, they are usually done either in response to strong growth or debt in anticipation of the damage that could cause increasing debt. In the United States, there are debt provisions in the constitutions of individual states since 1840. They were introduced so they could meet their financial obligations, this in case the federal government refused to help to get them off the hook.



It has preceded in the last twenty years in New Zealand on the entire legal basis by the Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994 a responsible fiscal policy. Similar laws followed by the financial crises in East Asia and Brazil in the late nineties. When in 2008 the financial crisis began such laws were back in fashion. They usually combine different fiscal rules. Against this background, it is not surprising that Germany has adopted debt brake in the middle of the crisis.
Is the German debt brake in the light of international experience proper assessed? In general they do not think so, fiscal rules are often introduced in financial distress, but they can take the form of spending limits. They can specify that a government must not spend more than a certain sum per year.



The best Example is the American financial reorganization Act of 1990 (Budget Enforcement Act) and the balanced budget law of 1997 (Balanced Budget Act). In the Netherlands, in coalition agreements each ministry multi-year spending limits are set after a thorough investigation and parliament’s approval. Deficit rules will start in a kind of limit on the annual budget deficit. In the European Union the debt of a member country should not exceed three percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). However, debt rules set limits to the public debt, which should not exceeded by a government. The Polish Constitution states that the government can not borrow more if it would exceed the overall ceiling of 60 per cent of GDP.



Many countries combine these rules. Sweden has a surplus rule and a number of limitations issue. Britain has both the rule should be "sustainable investment" and the "golden rule", after the loans over the economic cycle included only for investment. Germany's debt brake is a "balanced budget" rule. Also, this type has certain weaknesses that should be monitored and possibly corrected.



Consider the balanced budget rules, the "first generation" that are in most American states into force. They either require only the submission of a balanced budget, or they determine that the fiscal year must be really close with a balanced budget. The economic conditions are not considered. Such arrangements are generally in good times too easy to observe in bad times too heavy. The governments of USA states with such a fiscal rule are known for their output-enhancing programs in periods of economic growth. In bad times, the financial position may deteriorate rapidly. A government must be sensitive to cut to balance the budget.



This has consequences for the economy. One common criticism according to which such fiscal rules are pro-cyclical. That is, in economically depressed times to force a government to cuts when the economy is thriving, they lead to an increase in public expenditure. This problem can be observed particularly well in California. There is a strict form of balanced budget rule, which does not allow it, the deficit of a year to transfer the following year. Falling public revenues lower than planned in the Budget, the Governor therefore proposes during the year supplementary budget measures. The experience since 2008 has been devastating: Every few months there were deep cuts necessary because company broke and property tax revenues losses.



This problem can be circumvented in two ways. First you can take a get-out clause or authorize the suspension of the rule when the economy is weakest. The example, the initial version of the European Stability and Growth Pact, and the automatic suspension from a negative growth of more than 2 percent of GDP. The second option is to refer to the balanced budget rule to the economic cycle. This allows the government to incur debt when the economy is weak, as they must form with good economic surpluses. The problem with the EU 3% is that there is no overall control on the in and out put of the states. It simple counts on the honesty of the countries, as we have seen in Greece it failed. The situation in Ireland was different.



Portugal had the same situation and Ireland should never have given in to the blackmail of the EU finance and the IMF. They would have come out of the problems without as now being saddled up with 40 billion they do not need. The other half was used to save the very banks that created the problem. The EU should have set a finance instruction for countries to follow and with that they would not and could not knock on the Eu finance doors. It is obvious that if not such rules are set than countries can spend and spent in the knowledge that others would bail them out.



The German debt brake is clearly a balanced budget rule, the "second generation". First, it is based on a structural budget balance: The structural that is independent of the economic net borrowing by the federal to 0.35 percent of GDP limit, the states must have a structurally balanced budget. In practice this means that the budget target will vary according to production potential. The amount of 0.35 percent of GDP, for example, is required in a year in which the output gap is zero. In periods where the growth is greater than the potential, the government must generate a surplus; in phases in which growth falls below the potential liabilities are allowed. Second, there is a get-out clause: An absolute majority in the Bundestag may decide to suspend the rule. This should be done only in emergency situations. The parliament must then simultaneously make arrangements for the settlement of the additional loans. However it is just on this point that the EU with similar rules went wrong and with that brought the EU coin the Euro in trouble.



Another problem relates to compliance with budgetary rules in which often the government only is required for introducing a balanced budget. If however outside forces such as the bank failures of 2008 are disengaging the balanced budget, if the actual financial statements indicate threats with dire consequences, will the debt brake then still work? In such a case the government has the burden of finding the economic situation in a reasonable way back.



The addition of output targets alone is not sufficient to guarantee a well-functioning debt brake. It is important to give politicians the right incentives to enforce the new rules too. There are world wide countless examples of failed fiscal rules. Take an look at the publication "Public finances in the European Economic and Monetary Union," EU Commission in 2009: We read of the increase of fiscal rules and the introduction of a budget surplus commitment in Hungary in 2007, based on limitations of the regional debt Portugal and a cap of the nominal deficit by the Polish central government 2006th All these arrangements have been either suspended or abolished.



The success of fiscal rules depends on the incentives that they offer the policy to comply with the requirements. One can make two predictions. The first is the public support. Politicians consider budgetary rules if they believe that they have the public on their side. In the Netherlands in the early eighties, the Lubbers government agreed in a coalition agreement between the government parties to a deficit target and expenditure ceilings for all ministries. This fiscal agreement led to a reduction in public spending and borrowing. Particularly important, however, is that the coalition parties remained at the next election in 1986 of power. From this they learned that their fiscal approach was rewarded.



Public support for fiscal discipline was important in the UK. In contrast to the Netherlands, where multi-party coalitions are the rule, there is in the UK mostly only a one-party government. Voters can therefore clearly identify who they blame for budget problems. In addition, the policy preferences of the individual ministers are similar when all members of the same party. This means that they can delegate the sole responsibility to a Minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Economic literacy is an important factor in British elections, and the Minister of Finance plays both in his party and the electorate a significant role. In fact he can turn the tables any way he wants as the electorate has no knowledge of the financial implications of any decision. The elected government therefore relies on the news papers to explain their view to the electorate. That this does not always work did show at the last general election in 2010 were the Conservatives party after 13 years in opposition still not managed to win the election but had to rely on the sudden switch from left to right of the Liberal party.



The second prediction concerns the question of whether a fiscal rule helps the government to coordinate better internally. The Dutch and British cases illustrate the different voting problems that have one-party coalition and work around this. Fiscal rules are intended to prevent the policy succumbs to the temptation to increase spending too excessively to increase the popularity of the short term. If the term "Fiscal Governance" describes thus secure the whole set of norms, institutions and rules, the financial discipline. The respective government type determines which type will result in "Fiscal governance is more likely to succeed.



Specifically: In the government coalition parties are also partners and competitors. They also share different political priorities. Fiscal agreements are helpful because they define the policy space that each party has in the territories occupied by their ministries. They also facilitate other parties to control whether a party holds the contract. In such a government, no party's strategic budget authority would be delegated to a central character that could use the budget to help the political competition.



In the one-party voting problem is different. The ministers are members of various wings of the parties and each have their constituencies whose interests do them primarily serve. The general policy preferences of the same Minister, however, generally to a large extent. A strong finance minister, who draws up the budget in close consultation with Cabinet colleagues, also contributes to intra-party communication. For such a type of government, the delegation of responsibility fits in a strong central figure more precise than a fiscal regime. The failure in the UK to control the spiralling debt shows that the strong central figure is not found yet.



Fiscal rules are a means to an end. Lead them to win votes and they contribute to better coordination of government, the politicians will meet them likely. So crucial is the political environment that they are embedded in the fiscal rules. Especially in the EU there are highly combines of different forms of government that respond to different incentives. With the national conditions of the Member States unchanged, a Brussels rule unit is needed to meet its target for sure.

===============================================================

30-01-2011

Unrest in the world and mainly in the Middle East world, some countries are labelled as dictators although they have a more democratic system than for example the USA. Could it be that the USA and Israel have decided that an all out attack is not possible and now try to topple the sitting governments with the leaders they do not like with their own stooges which they can use any way they want.



It worked well with Saddam till he thought he could do it alone, it works well with Mubarak in Egypt, and however there is a growing risk that he will put forwards his son as the new president. The USA have forwarded already one of their trusted disciples as an replacement to make sure the borders between Gaza and Egypt will be staying closed till such time that no Gaza inhabitant is still able to gross into Egypt.



Only Tunisia's dictator so far, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, has been toppled, while Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak - who has ruled that ancient land longer than many pharaohs - announced Tuesday that he will step down in September and than changed his mind and will run for a next term, and he no doubt will that way the billions will be filling his pockets a little longer.



The main other country the USA had hoped for is Syria but that planned demonstration was a death fish in the water. Algeria and Morocco are not going that well either but they still hope that other Arab autocrats are bound to go. Autocrats in the American language are leaders who do not obey the USA as the ultimate leader.



But what will happen when the so-called autocrat is gone? Will the western democracy take over will a civilian strongman fill the void with a new autocracy? It happened before see Egypt and Iraq both on instigation of the Americans and is still fashionable in some part of the world. Or will it be a democracy but despised b the Western world because they do not like the president or the premier.



Democracy in the Western world is divided into democracy we like and democracies we do not like but are proper democracies who do not want to obey the Western values. The only real change of leadership will be in Tunisia, but not in Egypt or any of the other Arab countries. We like to point out that Egypt, Lebanon or Iran are not as suggested by the USA press Arab countries. In the USA that is only announced as such to infiltrate the minds of the average Americans. Fox news is a bright example of this.



A dictator can only be brought to fall if outside funding is available and there is a likely Western trained candidate. See as an example Georgia where a dictator rules who is seen as a dictator by the people but is shown as a thru democrat by his installers and supporters the Western states. So what can the West do to keep their favoured dictators in place, dictators like the one in Egypt ruling under the emergency law so that no other can run for president and that all with USA payment as in Egypt at the rate of at least 1.5 billion a year.



To keep a dictator in power it is needed that there is a divided opposition, the dictator can therefore do several things to keep it divided, violence and money, divide and rule as the old Julius Caesar said so terrifying clearly. Look at Israel that slowly but secure is turned into a fascist state wit measures that would not have been shunned by Hitler. Israel leans on the expected Nakba bill to become law, if so non-Jews are not longer to live in certain communities, a situation similar as what Hitler had and about which the Israeli Jews are still complaining.



Democracy in Israel is already death, buried under American dollars, and nuclear arms. Further laws are in the make to silence individuals and groups who criticise the government. Free speech is already standing on a very thin line and corruption and discrimination are the most visible actions of the Israeli government. The funniest thing in all this is that the Anti-incitement Bill will criminalizes anyone who publish anything that denies Israel's democratic and Jewish character. A country that has just as much democracy in it as Somalia has. Forcing people on penalty of imprisonment to call it a democracy, while it cannot be called a democracy, not by far.



However, while Russia and America signed the reduction of nuclear weapons, the largest producer and holder of nuclear arms after the USA and Russia, the state of Israel has the free hand to do what they do best, action with violence and pointing to their nuclear weapons as a way of intimidation. Were the Americans the only state in the world who actual used those weapons and still is threatening other countries with those weapons, Israel will use them to proof the point that they are willing to kill, they have taken over the slogan from the Americans, “if it moves kill it, if it still breaths kill it again".



For Egypt there is still hope, they maybe have a rule under an emergency law, but they also have still democracy.



Egypt is fortunate; America has already selected a new leader for Egypt Mohamed ElBaradei. Always a trustable figure for the Americans. However man may doubt of whether the next presidential election is held on schedule in September or moved up, ElBaradei, or anyone like him leading a broad opposition front, will probably loose to the President if he runs again or the vice president. Mubaraks National Democratic Party will win, the emergency law will make sure of that, anyone running can count as it has happened before to end up on fraud charges and disappear in jail.



The problem is that Western Countries see it their way; however their way is not the way of the Middle East. Unless the Western Countries will understand how the system works they will run into trouble time after time as they do now.



The West sees it as a priority that the democratic rules will be written so that free and fair elections are possible. This must happen before democratic elections can be held in Egypt. This is than told by Western countries who as in the USA selected a president that lost the elections, were freedom of speech is that of what the government allows to be said or published. Or in the EU were the law makers or president are not elected at all. Or from Israel that does not allow any form of democracy.



If Mubarak will allow for a transitional government something that will be doubt full as the USA government does not want to come in a situation were Egypt removes the support for Israel. However, such a transitional government should aim for inclusion, and should test the democratic commitment of dubious players rather than inadvertently induce them to become violent opponents.



It is the Americans and Mubarak who hold the balance.
The masses on the street will slowly decline and what stay will will be removed from sight. Till the September election the situation will be staying the same regardless how many protesters there will be.



The West had the change for change here, but by accident or deliberate missed the chance, there will be no second chance here.



After this the world will change, the USA will have lost face, the Israeli are exposed, and the EU will be what it always was, just talk.

=============================================================