June 2011

04-06-2011
Remember the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia and Sri Lanka? I distinctly remember people making jokes about how they’d find a way to blame the whole catastrophe on global warming. The climate change hype is beyond parody, it is a complete joke launched to have the rich pickings of the extra costs charged to the customers. Sad part of this is that some are now actual believing that there is indeed a man made global warming. Remember this years earth quakes, storms cyclones and the many many forest fires. Indeed global warming they say.



Unlike most apparently intractable problems, which have a tendency to go away when examined closely and analytically, the climate change predicament just seems to get bigger and scarier the more we learn about it. This how it must have been and experienced when the natural global warming did the ice melting, resulting in a different environment for many animals alive, it must have been the same experience when the global cooling was set in and once again the animals suffered a different changing environment. The animals as we know adapted to the changes, but we as humans do not.



Now we discover that not only are the oceans and the atmosphere conspiring against us, bringing baking temperatures, more powerful storms, floods and ever-climbing sea levels, but the crust beneath our feet seems likely to join in too. Of this is due to the working of nature or due to the neutron accelerators is an open question. Fact is that calculations made before those accelerators started showed that within a three to five year period after the start-up of the accelerators in North America and Swiss the earth crust would take an hammering resulting in more earthquakes. This would have a result that seas would be swiped too incredible heights causing flooding and flooding disasters, an accelerated rise in sea water levels creating a change in the earth’s flow, which would result in heavier then normal cyclones.



It will be obvious that the ones who were paying for those accelerators and the scientists paid by them would deny this and see it as an harmless scientific project. When it cost money and corporate business is involved they will do all they can to show the people that what they do is right and to the benefit of the people on earth, it could be almost an Bilderberg project and may be it is as such. However the fact remains, a sudden heavy increase in earth quakes, heavy flooding sea level rises and forest fires. Let us be aware that the accelerators were set-up in first instance to prove that the Big Bang theory could be right. However that theory is now in severe doubt as even the stoutness of supporters now believe that there must have been a prelude to the Big Bang.



Looking back to other periods in our planet’s history when the climate was swinging about wildly, most notably during the last ice age, it appears that far more than the weather was affected. The solid earth also became restless, with an increase in volcanic activity, earthquakes, giant submarine landslides and tsunamis. At the rate climate change is accelerating, there is every prospect that we will see a similar response from the planet, heralding not just a warmer future but also a fiery one.



The work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science, consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. And furthermore, the consensus of scientists has frequently been wrong. They were wrong when they believed, earlier in the lifetime, that the continents did not move. So is it that what we are looking on at this moment is what passes for science on the left these days? It would be fun, however, to apply that logic to other historical events. Therefore look at some of the theories what can be applied to make situations to be seen as right while in fact it is a man made arrangement.


THEORY 1, Every time I cross a empty road there are suddenly cars coming from all sides, therefore crossing a road causes the crossing to be obstructed.

THEORY 2, The sun shines therefore you water the garden, after which it starts to rain. Therefore watering the garden caused rain to fall.


THEORY 3: The period before Wimbledon tennis tournament is always dry and sunny, but at the tournament it always have a pore down of heavy rain. Therefore playing tennis caused it to rain.

I you would embrace this system of “logic”, you can use it to explain just about anything.



The facts however do remain. There are more and heavier earthquakes, more and heavier flooding, cyclones and forest fires. There is also a human fire brand going in the world, mainly in the middle east and the North Caucasus, man made but they are till this moment unstoppable. It will increase the value of commodities, this in turn will increase the riches of the ones who organize the turbulence either by creating rebellion and wars or by terrifying populations in the believe of global warming and the need for higher prices for oil/gas and food to pay for the fight against the global warming. No fight is done as such then only the production of mountains of reports and planned considerations for action to be taken when the time is right, it never will. But the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer.



The ultimate result will be as Bilderberg group would be able to reach their destiny and managed to get a one government for the whole world. We can all but dream and while we dreaming our pockets are being emptied by higher taxes, higher oil/gas prices, higher food prices. Our democratic rights are being abolished and replaced by a membership in a corporate government style, were the First ministers are in fact the CEO officer of the State and were people are being driven to a vote for the person already elected by the corporate board of International business, to be the next first minister. There control of the Media will make sure that the right stories are launched to make sure the civilian population will vote for the person they have selected. Obstructions are not allowed, and with those who obstruct are being dealt with in a most deceived way, the government controlled security services will make sure of it and the police will do what they are told and the obstructer is either eliminated, suicide,car crash,accident, or fitted up with a serious crime which leaves them to rot in jail.



It all has nothing to do with global warming but all with tied control and getting rich!

06-06-2011
We have made many times comparisons between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Both having as head of state a queen, the Dutch queen more appreciated as a person and normality then the English queen who is more a statuary tourist attraction then a celebrated head of state. It was clearly to see when the Dutch queen celebrated her birthday, when the whole of the Netherlands was a waving sea of orange and red/white/blue flags, with almost every place his street parties and their own celebrations. Then look sat the English queens birthday, it passed with a the usual parade static and without any form of public enthusiasm, no street blocking growth with flags, no street parties actual no nothing.

On crime level they are equal with a slightly higher rate of solving crimes in the Netherlands, but overall the detection of the culprits of a crime is far below par in both countries. On the financial field of play once again the balance goes to the Netherlands, with a much lower unemployment a better bank control, a higher level of economic development and a financial reasonable situation. That unemployment in the United Kingdom is high, even after the many ways of hiding the real figures. The financial situation is to say it simple rotten in the United Kingdom if it was not for their close ties for the USA, the rating agencies would have them down graded a long time ago. However between friends you don’t do this.

The IMF is in principle prepared to support the Pound on certain conditions. The EMF for the EU nations in principle created an on call funding of 500 Billion Euros. That is money that needs to be paid in an emergency not now. The IMF added to this another 220 billion Euros as safeguard. However, the USA, who is the same problems as the UK launched the idea of starting a worldwide ban without the need for war declarations but by using local terrorist groups to act as demonstrators to overrun their governments. The USA cannot afford the costs so the successful persuaded the weak leaders of France and Britain to do it for them. Neither France nor Britain can afford the costs so France kept them selves down to miniscule small scale attacks while Britain, took on them the almost 90% of the onslaught. However Britain cannot afford the costs and are therefore cariole in more loans and to rip of the British population.

In Britain the taxes were raised fast the cost of living expected to pass the 5% inflation, the cost of fuel expected to pass the 20%, while the incomes are squeezed by higher social costs. All in Britain, except the already rich and the members of government feel the pinch, while the exception group fills their pockets faster than filling a bucket of water. De Bilderberg group must be by now regret that they in the past selected the present PM of Britain as PM. The man is an obvious failure and during the elections which he should have won by a landslide, regarding the International support and the US/UK Media support. He did not however and had to accept the offer of one of the slimiest figures in British politics, Nick Clegg. This man has shown to know how to talk to persuade the people by promising them all and then gives nothing. He is the first man in Britain who single handed managed to reduce a growing party into a fast slinking heap of confusion.

However it does not stop the British to target others for their warfare as they know very well that they are protected by a secret service which hold the population under tied control. A population that as history has shown let their governments come away with murder and then still say thank you can we have some more. Their wars always were started on that principle, wars they always lost and then later claimed they won it single handed. The first WW was started by them on a fantasy accusation nothing to do with them, and they lost and millions of Britten lost their lives with it. Only the effort of the rest of the world and the common wealth countries managed to turn the tie and Germany was beaten.

In WW2 they did the same this time the excuse was that Germany had invaded the German Sudeten land a part that was Germany but was taken away from them after WW1. And again they lost; it needed every single boat from private Britain to get the soldiers of the coast before they were slaughtered by Germany. Again it was the rest of the world that saved the day and beat the Germans. It did not stop the Britten that they had beaten Germany single handed. The only wars Britain ever won was against people who were either unarmed or had just primitive armoury, like bow and arrow. Even then at the end they lost and all the land they had occupied either by force or obtained for money from other countries such as the Dutch and the Germans.

It did not stop them from slaughtering almost the entire populations of the North America’s and Australia. They did try the same with India but there were simple to many. It is this kind of self proclaimed superiority that makes them a war loving country, together with the always at war being USA they form a destructed force in the world and they will go the way as so many destructed forces before them, into obscurity. In the time between they have together with the USA started the WW3. They do not call it as such as they as cowards do, never issued a war declaration. Instead they created excuses, was the excuse that Germany had crossed Belgium the reason for WW1, the invasion of Sudetenland the excuse for WW2, the weapons of mass destruction for the attack on Iraq, the destruction of non-Islamic structures the excuse for the war on Afghanistan, all fantasies but by well directed media made look as a fact.

The excuse for Libya was the intention of the Libyan government to kill off the population of Benghazi. As with all the fantasy excuses the Libyan government had never any intention to do so, but the Media pictured the government as evil and most of the always slavish followers in Britten as usual believed it. And so the started another war, again without a war declaration. However it does take longer then they expected and the civilian population killed only in the last two day reached nearly one thousand, woman children, all of them declared Libyan government soldiers by the British war lords. Next should have been Syria; however other countries wised up by the murderous tactics of the British in Libya obstructing their progress.

In maybe in the interest of Britain to downgrade the war efforts as was done in the Netherlands id saved a fortune on capital spent as seen in the Netherlands they used it for investments into the industry. The business structure in Britain is however different of that in the Netherlands. In the Netherlands they still have the democratic system with corporate influences. In Britten however they have a military corporate based government which has no place for democracy. It made it therefore possible that the government simple decided to go into Europe without asking the parliament or the population. That they could go to war without asking the parliament or the population, they are a military corporate based government were people are kept inline so that they can pay their taxes to feed the spoils of the army and government. It cannot be doubted that if the Government would follow a democratic line the instigators would either have seen to committed suicide, had a car crash or another deadly accident. The alternative is the military corporation that way money rolls in and the pockets can be filled. Tony Blair is a good example but so is George Bush.


The other part on which they could have saved funding was the EU, an political organisation led by commissioners unelected and freely appointed on the base of who you know and not what you know, it is a pocket filler for them. In the Netherlands there is a large opposition against the EU however as a small country relying on the neighbour’s trade they have to accept the situation. With Britain that is not the case. They actual would be better of outside the EU and form a group with Ireland/Canada and the USA. However the present PM did sign all the relevant documents although he blames that on the previous government. This in the knowledge that only a miniscule group of Britten would actual look at the dates of the signatures, blaming someone else is therefore a save bet. However, it made Britain liable for the bail out of EURO countries while Britain itself did not have the EURO.

They were forced to accept the fact that they would have to pay billions with nothing in return. It was therefore that the EU was forced to save the EURO and arrange money funding for Greece. They lend on terms an amount of 110 billion Euros to Greece. However they did not make an ultimate warning to Greece. Nor did they make the condition that this would be all they would get. In principle it means that Greece can go on spending well above the GDP and can expect the Euro Nations mainly Germany/ Britain and the Dutch to pay for it. Over and over again as there is not incentive that the Greece government has to make the ends meet, they simple can spent it and then as is the case at the moment receive another payment of 120 billion. When that is gone and it will last not longer then a year or a year and a half, they will knock on the EU door for more money otherwise they blow the EURO to sinking.

This would have been avoided and set a warning to other states, special in the Mediterranean area to keep check on their balance books. The warning could simple have been if a Country does not get his finances in a controllable order they would be rejected from the EU States. The philosophy behind that is that it would not be possible or fair to and for the other Eu nations to go on for ever to fund the spending of a failing country.

However they did not do so. Maybe they will in the future otherwise they will regret it in the future but on this moment there is no break on the spending of other Eu countries as they simple can expect that the rich Eu countries will bail them out. That expectation you can reflect on at the Portugal Parliament decision to reject austerity proposals of the Government, that parliament simple count on it that the EU will bail them out. A stern lending warning made to Greece would have avoided this.

If the Eu had a central account control then they could have prevented the slide of the Mediterranean countries in a financial oblivion. This under the motto, they bail us out so who cares. Now we just had Portugal, while Spain is hovering on the border of solvency, next will be Italy, before the smaller countries will come knocking. The EU has allocated an instant amount of 60 Billion for emergencies. While on a discreet way the EU central bank will buy Bonds to avoid the expected speculation. Because in all this upheaval of finances Europe but also worldwide it should not be forgotten that the speculations from financial institutions in the States and the UK and Iceland started the problems.
*************************************************

08-06-2011
Remember how it all started?
The collapse of the Lehman brothers followed by Freddy Mac and Fanny May only just speeded the problems up as that collapse worldwide would come in any case. The law of average would have made it clear to any banker that in bad times nobody spent and in good times they all overspent. Then if the overspending cannot be returned, regardless of this from Individuals or from States, the banks have problems, then if the inter lending stops recession sticks his head up once again. This will go on happening time after time.

Having experienced this, it will be obvious that the US and EU have spend considerable more then other countries. Those countries with absurd debts are also the countries that are always at war for one reason of another. Mainly to assist the US in their wars for Oil, by them allocated as the war against terrorism. Where as by the notion need to be attached that as they had behaved themselves as a normal peaceful country there would not be a war on terrorism on the scale it is now. There is never in the world history a notion that terrorism actual was defeated. There was during the election in the UK a lot of screaming from a certain press and media as that the UK was in a similar state as Greece. However that was written and said to win an election for the party they supported, it was not correct nor did they win. People would have more intellect then that, however they did not.

As can be seen the public debt of Japan is indeed very high, where as by 90% of the debt is owned by the Japanese themselves, this combined with a high savings rate makes it easier for the Government to finance. How the debt will stand after the nuclear disaster is cleared falls to be seen. In comparison in the US 25% of the debt is owned by foreigners while also the saving is minimal. Here is the important factor that the annual debt is growing creating a deterioration of the public debt.

The parallel between the Netherlands and the UK is obvious, both have a low savings rate and an increasing debt, however the Dutch have managed, mainly by cutting down on health and pensions to keep the spending at 6% In the UK there is also cuttings in Health and pensions but the spending on defence has risen in the last 15 years to an abnormal rate for a country of the UK size, and is still rising fast, the latest war folly have added an other near 2 billion pound to the debt already owned and going up instead of down.

Hence, although the situation was not good when the coalition took over, it was in the UK not half as bad as the Conservative promoting news papers want the citizen to believe. And indeed many did not believe it. After all they could check the figures on the internet themselves. Therefore, the Conservative party did not win. If you here the Conservative News papers you would think they had won by a landslide. That they lie outright as the law said he is does not the matter, by those US State controlled news papers. However now the situation is a near bankruptcy bordering situation only to be hold intact by the refusal of the rating agencies to re-valuate Britain, they are restricted by USA government from doing so. It is the main reason that Britain stays afloat.

However, what would have been the result if those papers had told the right side of the story. What if many voters rejected from voting and those on the country side who were told to vote Conservative or to loose their job, what if they had been able to vote, what if they had be able to make a choice. However, one thing must be clear, news papers can side with a political party, for the benefit of promises made by that party, but they should not lie outright as is done now. If they wish to do so then they place themselves at the same level as the Volkische Beobachter the newspaper who promoted Adolf Hitler into power.
We agree the previous premier was not a movie star image. We realise that in English speaking Countries it does not the matter what the man knows but how he looks and how good he can expresses him.

That the Conservatives will do better falls to be seen, certain is that they will increase the defence spending as that is the area were the US will demand increases and were they had their fall-out with the sitting premier. After all the USA is planning a new war and that cost money. Who will suffer? Who knows, however, fact is that the Conservatives is a party of the rich and wealthy, they look in first instance after the rich and wealthy, their history shows that and the Conservatives Councils act like that on a near daily base. Statements made before and after the election are clear enough and directed against the poor, the disabled and the ones without work, which the Conservatives say in disgusting high, they forget that it was higher when they were in power. And the debt is indeed rising fast.

We are afraid that we will see more deprived areas in the UK, it is already one of the most deprived countries in Western Europe, and it has villages without roads road drainage or street lightening. This is seen nowhere else in the western world, and it is obvious that those areas are ruled by Conservative Councils. Therefore it will therefore also obvious that, as one councillor of the Conservatives said, let bulldoze those area’s with so an 1800 families in modernised up to date homes this to be build new houses for the rich and wealthy under a rent to buy system as there is it were the landlords, the conservatives supporters can make twice as much money. An attitude like this would only be possible in the USA no other country then maybe Israel would sink that low.

As they done before they will strip the pensions to the bone, after all a first saving is a death pensioner. The disabled will sent to work, and if they cannot they will be placed in special homes were their lifespan will be reduced till a couple of weeks. The unemployed will be getting a reduced income, and if the rumours are correct then first time of school unemployed youngsters will get nothing at all. The one who read this will say that is not possible, maybe not, but this is what the Conservatives have done when they were in power, so what stops them from doing it again.

They should have told benefit takers, maximum for two children child benefit, they should have told the incapacity benefit users that the rules would change. No hand outs anymore for silly thing such as stress, anxiety, a cut, a splinter, limited payments for other small handicaps just as in an accident insurance. A person who is deaf on one site does not need the higher rate of disability, nor the one with glasses. The missing of a finger how sad that may be is not a free card for the higher rate of disability. In fact that kind of disabilities does not exist it are handicaps, it does not stop them from working, although maybe with a handicap, it certainly not grant them a free rite for the rest of their lives. Sitting in a wheel chair is not a free card for permanent hand outs.

It is about time that Britain is going back to basics. A good funding for the once who really need it, a good funding of the pensions, and benefits only to the ones who really need it. If the Conservatives had raised the tax level to 15,000 then the poorer one in the population would have up to 1600 pound more to spent, it would have got them our of poverty. It also would have made a wider space between the habitual benefit seekers and the real working people.

They missed that chance; the why is obvious they wanted to protect their rich and wealthy friend. WHY? Do those in Government really think that the rich will be desperate for 250 pound a year winter payment? Do the ones who living in warm countries really need the winter payments? No they don’t, but the Conservative principle is greed, and what goes to the poor does not go in their pocket and for that reason it is wrong.

So far as we can see now the Dutch have used their knowledge and finances well to let it benefit the population, as was done in almost any other mid/north European country they missed their change big time. In any case it is obvious that the Conservatives have used the recession created by the Financial Institutions who also by a mere coincidence are rich and wealthy and in some cases Party financiers and members of that party, to win an election they did not win, the only reason they will be in limited power is because the Liberal Democrat party was suddenly not so Democratic anymore and made a complete U turn from the left side of the Labour party to the right side of the Conservative party. Here we have a party that if the next time comes around will be voted into oblivion just because of that.

Many voters voted in the UK for the liberal Democrats in the hope not to let the Conservatives in and then they invite the Conservatives in with their help, throwing overboard all the promises they made in the run-up to the election. It reminds us on the Democrats in the Netherlands were the VVD the Liberal Democratic party in the Netherlands made years back, when they had joined the Government in the Netherlands, never to abolish the Guilder, while at the same time they were already negotiating the Euro. Just as the Liberal Democrats in the UK the VVD the Liberal Democrats in the Netherlands also promised not to work with a special other party. In the UK that was before the election not to go together with the Conservatives, to make a U turn after the election. Then again the present PM of the UK makes a U turn almost every day.

The conclusion can only be one for both Countries; it is not the song but the singers who promote the tune. Voters, citizens they are only there to vote, after that the elected Government has no time for them anymore as it will be pocket filling time, a one way to being a millionaire. And so it did happen, Britain is now one of the poorest countries in the EU a fact clearly hidden away behind the daily feature of the wars created by the USA and fought by Britain. The PM and his government are already either millionaire of NonDoms i.e. millionaire who do not live or work in the UK but buy their way into the House of Lords or Government. In short they do not have a clue other then making money, lots of money out of the situation.

There is a story written in the Bible, as that Jesus during his wandering of Earth destroyed in the Temple the tables of the money lenders and exchangers. We always presumed that those money lenders and money exchangers were Jewish. However, could it have been that they were in fact the early resembles of the Conservatives party in Britain, their attitude was the same? They misused trust when they said: We do not sign up for the total integration of Europe, so they did.
We do not want the EURO, if so why did they sign the needed papers in Brussels.
We want to keep our distance from Europe; they said if that is so why they want more British into the European institutions.
The problem is they are habitual liars, so that if you ask them of they telling the truth you know the answer instantly, if the say yes.
Their aim is not getting Britain out of recession and into a healthy state, No that will come later. No they want money first therefore first they have to create together with the US a new War. Big enough to solve their financial problems, big enough so that it will cost lives, costing live will bring sympathy from the people and via the sympathy you can rip them off for even larger amounts, you solve the unemployment by getting all those at the right age into an uniform, two weeks training and up to a battle field, they will die as rats, but they will be seen as hero’s, solve the unemployment reduces the benefits and force woman into work for war production.
Problem solved.
We just have to wait on which Countries the US will select for such all out battle, to solve all the financial problems. Libya and Syria on their own will not do to solve the problems, they need a bigger target. They need to be weak enough to roll over quickly, but rich enough to solve the financial problems they have. Taking on Russia, is a risk the country is to large, the same problem is with China and India, therefore Iran seems to be the first logical place, question being will it be big enough to keep it going for a couple of years to get all the finances sorted out.

There is North Korea, but that is tried before without much success. Could try the North Caucasus again but the risk will be enormous, leaves either the north states of South America as they have oil and do not like the USA. The risk is that Russia will take it out on the countries like the Ukraine and Poland. No, the best guess is IRAN and with some balancing they could involve Turkey as well, plus Armenia and take control of Azerbaijan, that would solve the Nagoro situation as well, Georgia could launch attacks on their northern break a ways again to keep the Russians busy.

That way if the Israeli will do their part and they will they always fight their history is that of fighting for the last 4000 years nearly day in day out at the times that they were not driven away. Israel has enough nuclear power to even to defeat Europe so they could launch a first strike and then let the US and the UK do the rest while they are keeping Europe in check.
It could work, if the Iranians would not set alight the oil sources in the Middle East every where.
It would leave enormous oil shortness, this will make the price rocket to 2.50 to 3.00 dollar a barrel maybe even higher, and that simple fact could stop the financial benefit for the US and the UK.
And what about the people what about the voters? Well you need them to get a vote but if they could find another way to get power and the money with it they would do so, voters are so boring and not only that a large percentage is poor how disgusting.
Anyway they should be happy to be still alive after that. If they are, fact will be that millions and millions will be killed, millions and millions will be maimed, and the State will be cashing in.
All problem solved, quarter of the world population wiped out by the killings or the nuclear fall out,
So no unemployment any more. No over population anymore, all is nice and fine.
Problem solved. Everybody happy!!!!!!!
10-06-2011
Let us see how it actual works, therefore we have to take a situation that speaks to many and therefore we have to place it
In a more up to date situation, the opponents of the Creator are like supporters of a baseball team. What ever their team is doing is right, no questions ask.


While they squander through the darkness of their mind searching for any possibility any sign that could put disbelieve in the Creation of the Almighty. Constant looking for the weak spots in deeds and in the writings of the history of the beginning of time. We remain in our knowledge of the Almighty we do not have to search for the truth it is right in front and around us day and night 24/7.


All the views we can take from the working of the mind, the moral relations, the laws founded on them are most important it gives us a view of the working and the implication of the working of the mind.
The intelligent mind, the temper, and actions corresponding with this intelligentsia are essential for the behaviour and happiness in all.


The Earth and Heaven above, the mind and the intelligent is just only a small corner of the Almighty kingdom of Heaven. The intelligent minds around us see the daily examples of the Sublime Creation, but they don't want to see it they see just progress of an evolution process and progress what in reality does not exist for which they do not have any realistic proof and having no intension to see it from the reality side i.e.: Intellectual Design.



We are told that the world could not have been created in 7 days or 144 hours, there are two ways to look at the creation, one from an absolute point of view and one of the views of realisms.
The absolute point of view is that every letter in the Bible is correct and has to be seen as being correct. The realistic point of view simple sees the Bible as an by humans written book transferred over thousands of years via stories from father to son from mother to daughter and every generation had its simple alterations to the original story.


The basic however, is the same the Almighty did create the Earth and the heaven. However the 24 hours a day was not known in that time, nor was the day divided in hours or minutes, known was day and night morning and evening the rest was either day or night were as by the night and sometimes the day's were longer or shorter depending on what time of the year it was.


As there was, no knowledge of the time as written in the Bible the creation could not have been made within the 144 hours.
There is no doubt about the creation but this was over a considerable longer period.
The earth was without form and void, the Bible said, and God created heaven and Earth.
That was on the first day, or it was the first act of the creation, later translated by humans not as the first action but as the first day. If it were the first action of the Creation than that could have been thousands even million of years ago, which would fall in line with carbon dating of the Earth.


The evolutions have so far never knowingly made a claim that they know how the heaven and earth had come into existence. They never will from science point of view, and they know it. They will be able in future with no doubt proof that a creation has taken place and that in theory the Earth could have been created out of the big bang theory. However, that on it self is no proof other then a suggestion based on probabilities, which could be true and could be not true.

However, even if hypothetical the great minds of the evolutionist, the supporters of the big bang theory could make sense out what had happened. Problem here is that even the Big Bang theory is now crumbling away under the findings of new research. Is that proof that the Almighty did not do this on the first day of his creation. If there was a big bang then there had to be something to make the big bang happening. Now we are back with the God Almighty.

An Intelligent Creator only could have made such an occurrence possible and so we are back on day one.
Do the intellectual minds of the evolutionist realize that while calculating the stars distance the light years to travel dating the soil and fossils investigating the history of humankind they fail to see the obvious. The Creation itself. They know what they see but don't see it they hear it but do not listen they read it but do not comprehend what is written, they do not apprehend that all of the world and all what happens on it is an adornment with a show of Divine wisdom of the Almighty.

12-06-2011


The Lord said: Jeremiah 31.

The Lord says, "The time is coming when I will be the God of all the tribes of Israel, and they will be my people. Jeremiah 31.

Nice said even nicer written, however, which tribes, the only tribe known of which they presume that they are descendants from the Judea tribe are spread wide around the world. The descendant’s of Levi are nowhere to be found, even if some of them call themselves Levi's. The other tribes? If they were ever a fact, something of which there is no proof other then what is written in the book of the Bible.



However the Bible itself can not be proven also. Fact is that there were two Hebrew groups between 1000 and 200 years BC one known as Israel, the other the more success and powerful one known as Judah. The northern group called Israel assimilated into the surrounding tribes we may presume, for certain is that they turned to Ba'al as their God if they did so, or they spread themselves over an wider area assimilated in the existing population. The history of Judah is better known although here also there are many gabs to be filled before the complete picture will be known.



Fact is that over the length between Jerusalem and the coast there was a small community that could be established as Hebrews. The question therefore in Jeremiah 31 is of no consequence to reality as there obvious will be no God of all the tribes as those tribes do not exist anymore, that is if they ever have. So who did put those words into Jeremiah 13? And who said so? The Lord? Doubtful.



"People of Israel, I have always loved you, so I continue to show you my constant love. Once again I will rebuild you. Once again you will take up your tambourines and dance joyfully. Once again you will plant vineyards on the hills of Samaria, and those who plant them will eat what the vineyards produce.
Contradiction after contradiction. I always loved you; If so why the rebuilding, as it should not have been destroyed in the first place.

"I will bring them from the north and gather them from the ends of the earth. The blind and the lame will come with them, pregnant women and those about to give birth. They will come back a great nation. My people will return weeping, praying as I lead them back. I will guide them to streams of water, on a smooth road where they will not stumble. I am like a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my oldest son." I continue to show you my constant love.” If that was the case why they were spread over the world in the first place, or why they prefer to stay in America, or is in that love included the destruction of the very people the Lord says he loves. Man can wonder what went through his head when his love for His people saw them being killed in the gas chambers of the Nazi’s. Man can ask themselves what kind of love it that, a love what allow you to have millions of the people you love and promised to protect to have them killed by the thousands at the time.



The Lord says, "Nations, listen to me and proclaim my words on the far-off shores. I scattered my people, but I will gather them and guard them as a shepherd guards his flock. I have set Israel's people free and have saved them from a mighty nation. They will come and sing for joy on Mount Zion and be delighted with my gifts- gifts of grain and wine and olive oil, gifts of sheep and cattle. They will be like a well-watered garden; they will have everything they need. Then the young women will dance and be happy, and men, young and old, will rejoice. I will comfort them and turn their mourning into joy, their sorrow into gladness.
So that is the love of the Lord, love them destroy them punish them and then bring them together again to do the same all over again. Why scatter them in the first place, it seems to the interested reader that something is going a miss here.



"I hear the people of Israel say in grief, "Lord, we were like an untamed animal, but you taught us to obey. Bring us back; we are ready to return to you, the Lord our God. We turned away from you, but soon we wanted to return. After you had punished us, we hung our heads in grief. We were ashamed and disgraced because we sinned when we were young.'

In fact the Lord had turned away from them so that they had to resort to other Gods, if the Lord which tell them that he loves them had taken care of them as a person who loves his people does. Then they had not turned away from the Lord in the first place. The whole of the story does not makes sense at all. Here is not a loving protecting God at work but a jealous mean God who want to control and wants to be obeyed, in fact a kind of control freak.


"Israel, you are my dearest child, the one I love best. Whenever I mention your name, I think of you with love. My heart goes out to you; I will be merciful. Set up signs and mark the road; find again the way by which you left. Come back, people of Israel, come home to the towns you left.

In fact the Lord of Israel created more war and destruction to his people, who he loves then even their worst enemy could have done.

The Prophet Isaiah prophesied:
Isaiah chapter 14 (TEV)
The Lord Almighty has sworn an oath: "What I have planned will happen. What I have determined to do will be done. I will destroy the Assyrians in my land of Israel and trample them on my mountains. I will free my people from the Assyrian yoke and from the burdens they have had to bear. This is my plan for the world, and my arm is stretched out to punish the nations." The Lord Almighty is determined to do this; he has stretched out his arm to punish, and no one can stop him.

Nobody? It seems that every tribe, every State and every group who wanted to have overrun Israel, what they have now is a small piece of ground, with large parts of that stolen from their neighbors. Making it rather obvious that the Tanaka does not mean anything to them.

Moses clearly said you shall not steal, so they did.

Moses clear said you shall not kill, so they do it daily.

Moses said you shall not bear grudges against your neighbors, so they do.

Moses said you shall not covet your neighbors properties and goods, so they take it and destroy.

And so we can go on and on and on.

They take what they can use, they use what can make them stand out of the others, while they realize very well that if their protectors, the USA and the UK would step back they would be on their own, and in time, spread around the world once more. As they have done nothing for their neighbors, for their friends, or for the world what can be seen as loyal or friendly.
The God from Israel if we have to believe the writers of the Bible promised a land of milk and honey, to be in reality a land of drought and no water, to protect them from the enemies but they where destroyed time after time, and he calls them my people. If he does that to his people, does that shows love, protection, prosperity for them? If so then he must have a weird feeling of love for them, more an love to hate version.
Mind you the Israeli have done all they could in their history so far as it can be confirmed, to break every command Moses have given them. For that reason only it would be doubtful of their God would keep his promise, as he said himself, I am a jealous God.
The only God Israel has left is an history book with nice stories for bedtime, the real God for them is America, he gives them protection, he gives them money, he gives them food, he gives them weapons with out that God there is no Israel.
The Bible God of Israel as history have shown that was wrong time after time, not other nations were punished but the Israelis were time after time. And once again due to their cruellties, their slaughter of the children, the innocent, their relentless aggression against other Countries, their murderous tacktics, their violents against humanity, the doom of destruction is looming over them.
Who can endure his fierce anger?
His wrath is poured out like fire;
the rocks are shattered before him.

What happened here is that all natural disasters are attributed to the anger of the Lord, if that is so why is it that always the innocent, the poor and righteous ones are punished by the result.

The LORD is good,
a refuge in times of trouble.
He cares for those who trust in him,
but with an overwhelming flood.

Then to trust them aside maim and kill them destroy their houses, and then calls them to tell them that he loves them.

The one who wrote this was in his time must have had a premonition of the coming of the Americans and their 200 nuclear warheads.



14-06-2011
The Lord created heaven and earth and all on and in it in six day and rested on the seventh.

We know God is good, all-powerful, and protective.
All evil will disappear and all injustice corrected. The Almighty is watching over all and everything.


He will change evil into good; we believe we are what he made us, manifestations of Himself.
We do not doubt God, nor do we doubt He is there, benevolent, wise, and good. He will come, the Son of man coming in a cloud with great power and majesty.

He have said to his disciples, there shall be a sign in the Sun, and in the Moon, and in the Stars; and upon Earth distress of the nations, by reason of confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves.
Man withering away in fear and expectation of what shall come upon the whole world. (St.Lukes XX1 25/33).


So let us pray for all mankind, for the ones in personal error, sins. So that they can gain the love of Him and be saved by the Great Designer who created Heaven and Earth.


It is frustrating to see why materialism and infidel doctrines are spreading so fast in spite of the Glorious word of the All-Powerful, the Benevolent, the Good and the Wise God.


Man has many diseases some of them fatal to religions, hypocrisy and denial.
Hypocrisy, to be a believing unbeliever, scepticism is a rejection of believe as a belief.
It is a state of mind, and this would succeed in implementing this in a system they would have virtually established a reduction ad absurdum.


Denial is in fact a simple, why ought we to believe. We believe that two apples and two apples makes four apples, we can see it so we believe it is correct. However, why believe something that is only known from hearsay and written down folk stories, a history without that there is any proof.


So why see it as truth without any evidence. We believe because we see the work of the Lord daily before our eyes. We all believe in principle, but some hide it some deny it.
We presume as a form of argument that we all know the truth, even our opponents do so although they always will deny it and ridicule it, and keep up the image that they do not believe.


However, they do believe, they do so just in case God does exist; just in case God is truth.
They will go a keeping up their image as a non-believer by spreading the word that God does not exist.


This in the full knowledge that He does exist, and pray in silence that their sins may be for given. Amen.


16-06-2011
US, EU and Israel are now half way through their New Middle East Wars
A statement by the in trouble himself being President Ahmadinejad said the USA/EU and Israel plans to attack two more Iran's allies in the Middle East. And he could be right, the Ax of three need a war to survive their economic problems. They started with Tunis, then as a bonus Egypt and Yemen fell into their lap so that it was easy for them to attack Libya. That war is not going to plan as the rebels are mostly out of Libyan terrorist taking a change to do what they have done in Pakistan and Yemen, to take over part of the country. This has changed sinse a couple of weeks when the US/UK sent in troops in the form as rebels to take on the Libyan army.



As Tradition by the US and the UK the war in Libya was started again on a fantasy story, like in Iraq the weapons of mass destruction and in Afghanistan the nasty Taliban. In both cases it was purely Corporate reasons for oil and pipelines. It is the same in Libya where the CIA draw up the story as that Libya wanted to kill the people of Benghazi, this was also just as the WMD in Iraq never the case, but for the US and UK people it looked like a plausible reason, it was not it was OIL! They said they did the action against Libya with the Arab states. However in reality it was only the dictatorial states of Saudi and Doha, two states were Human Rights are ignored as a matter of routine, but where the Human Rights groups always failing to report about. This is to be explained as that those so-called Human Rights groups are paid for and assisted by the US and the UN and both have the restriction not to expose any rights abuses in US friendly states. Bonking Moon certainly does not want to upset the US, as they pay his wages via the UN.



The statement from the president of Iran can be seen in two different ways, just as a rant by a head of State of a Middle East country. Or it can be seen as a rational way of thinking by a head of State whose minerals, oil/gas are commodities that are wanted by other States. States who have proven in the past, and present that commodities such as minerals oil/gas are seen as theirs and if they are not handed over freely than an excuse is found to create a situation of war and then they take the minerals oil/gas with the help of force. The Ax that starts and enforces such an oil/gas/minerals grab is always the USA/EU/Israel.



Israel is the partner who starts the rumors and stories (mostly fantasy). The USA then accepts Israel's reason as an excuse to attack. EU then comes in to help to destroy the conquered country under the heading, democracy and stabilization. The fact that the Country was an democracy, although not one as preferred, but always better then the democracy in the USA the EU or Israel, is not a fact in their expansion land grab. Democracy means the will of the people in which the people elect. In the USA means this, we take the power and if we not get it we re-arrange the votes so that we will get it.



In EU democracy means, the people elect but the elected members have no power, which is formed by an unelected self appointed commission and his self appointed president. In Israel it means the party who promise to kill the most Palestinians will win. This Ax has very close similarities to the Ax in WW2, then Germany, Italy and Spain. In this Germany wanted back the land stolen from them after WW1. In the USA version it is simple we want your money hand it over or we attack you. For the money read oil and gas.



It will be obvious that if the USA wants to attack Iran, any reason will do so long as it looks reasonable, details that is something they do not have to worry about as the UN is in their pocket and the security council are their friends now Russia is also a close ally of the USA if not already a vassal. And as they need the minerals oil/gas it will also be obvious that they cannot do this on their own. They need a reason. The Iraq reason was the non-existing WMD. The Afghan reason was the terrorist, real reason was the lack of pipeline progress with the Taliban Government. The reason for Iran will be the creation by Iran of nuclear weapons, although they do not have a shred of evidence, and Iran denied this story.



They, the Iranians, will never get it either, the Iran Government needs power, their present power supplies for their country is old and out of date (USA report 2006) hence they need nuclear power plants.

Civilized countries would help and reach the helping hand, not so by the USA they do not want to give an helping hand they want the oil and gas for themselves, and if that will costs 100 of thousands death, well, so what.

Still the USA has a problem, the nuclear weapons reason is after the disaster of the WMD, not a reason to be used on their own. Therefore they use the Jews, or better the Jews using the USA to get power. Israel is a renegade terrorist state, who managed to steal the land of the Palestinians on the west Bank and to imprison in a concentration camp called Gaza the other Palestinians. They act at the same way as the Nazi Germans did in WW2, murder and mayhem. Lies and false statements are common practice for the Jewish state. The problem here is if they are found lying and cheating at a daily base, just how much of their stories out of WW2 can be seen a correct.



No doubt in WW2 the Jews suffered murder and mayhem just as the Palestinians do now, but how much value can we put to the real figures they have mentioned. They were extreme high, but in the light of the many lies now, how high was it in reality. Their object against Nazi's is also very curious, they want to hunt down all Nazi's, but they support the Nazi meetings, parades and speeches in the Baltic Sea countries.



This is a similarity we see in other EU countries, special Germany and Britain and the Netherlands, two of those countries have parties which are ultra right, in The Netherlands the PVV being one of the largest parties, in Britain the BNP. Both parties are by the Governments and Newspapers portrayed as Fascist parties, but both countries and their Newspapers do not have a bad word for the Nazi support, the parades, the speeches and meetings. This are in the eyes of those countries friendly states, the fact that they allow the celebration of the German Nazi's is seen as an internal problem.



However, if Israel and the EU do not object to this Nazi celebration, why are they using it then against local parties? And why is Israel who at one hand supports those Nazi celebrations is calling others who object to their death camp policies, Nazi's?



Again in the light of the daily lie's of the Jews in Israel, did they really objected to the Nazi's or is it more that they serviced their purpose was it not so that Jews in Warsaw had not a nice deal going with the Germans in which the Jews sold other Jews in return for favors and food. Did not their many complain’s resulted, as was the purpose, the creation of the State of Israel. This creation was also based on a lie, the lie that thousands of years ago a man suddenly half way on his way to Egypt said I have just had a word with God and he told me that all the land we can see and beyond is now ours forever. Never mind that he had no proof that he ever spoke with a God, never mind that the land belonged to other tribes, never mind that they had to kill many to keep it, it was based on a lie which they say is the truth and if that is the truth then what is seen as a lie as every lie can be seen as a truth while being a lie. It is just as the WMD in Iraq the Nuclear weapons of Iran, simple an fantasy invention.

They now have decided that the best way to keep the risk of an attack on Israel while they attacking Iran, is to attack Syria and Lebanon first so that Syria and Lebanon could not attack Israel, both countries who would not do this, as it would risk to be over run themselves. So Israel has with the USA decided to attack Lebanon as the investigation in the Hariri murder will be pointed at Hezbollah and Syria, two flies in one move so to say. The simple fact that all point to an Israeli murder plot will be ignored as will the fact that it would be negative for Hezbollah and Syria, it did cost Syria their leverage in Lebanon they knew it would, so why should they risk it.



This was no doubt the reason that Israel did blow up Hariri and supplied the arms to the Syrians to start their demonstrations. USA knows that and have now taken over that infiltration into Syria from Turkey sides to enhance the violence of the demonstrations, Lebanon knows that too hence Hezbollah exposed CIA infiltration into their party. In fact the whole world knows it. It is the same situation as with the sinking of a South Korean ship. This ship hit a mine and it was for that reason it sunk, but an USA led investigation found that it was a North Korea attack that sunk the South Korean ship. Again the whole world knew that the investigation was a farce, but the main reason was to create an incident, this failed. They facts are simple the Ax controls the UN so what the UN says goes as that is what is ordered by the Ax.



The president of Iran also referred to remarks by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev who recently had expressed concern over the nature of Tehran's nuclear program.
Ahmadinejad said the Russian leader's stance was regrettable as was his decision to become a mouthpiece for the plot by the enemies of Iran. And in this effect he was right, the crawling on hand and knees of Medvedev to Obama is also not very good received in Russia, special now the Republicans, that are the senators in the USA with the guns but without the brains try to trouble the waters again by spreading lies as that Russia is breaking promises. And this is rich coming from a country that does break one promise after another and does not know the word honesty. Then again most of the USA is run by decedent of Jews or Germans a worse combination cannot be found. It was that fact that was seen by Hitler as the reason to kill them all; he recognized that violent streak as it was part of him. Worst is that Medvedev simple believes what the USA is telling him, no question asked no proof required. That last one would be useless anyway as the USA makes up stories as they go along, they control the Media to inform the public the way they see it.



Ties between Tehran and Moscow suffered when Russia last month backed a fourth UN Security Council resolution imposing new sanctions against Iran and its nuclear program,
after Russia's kneel fall for the USA and their siding with the USA. It is too early to see of Russia is now also a vassal of the USA but from the outside they coming near to that status.
It is obvious that the Ax of war lords have started a new propaganda war against Iran, which is written by Israel and directed by the US and supported by Russia.



Even for a child it is obvious that Iran is trying to produce nuclear power stations for the well being of their country. The USA reports in 2004 to 2006 confirm this. Then Israel stuck his oar in it and suddenly Israel claimed that they had proof that Iran was trying to produce nuclear weapons without supplying such a proof other than fantasies and suggestions. The Jewish vassal states such as Britain and Germany took over the claim. There were many suggestions many coming from Israel. Israel itself a nuclear power, who refuses inspection of what they are actual doing or to obey the UN. Their aim is to maim regardless where.



Just now the UN Council passed a new round of sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program, despite assurances from Tehran that the nuclear program is peaceful and strict supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency. It’s all a waste of time by doing this, the creation of more hatred and aggression. All this without the slightest of proof but simple on the order of the USA who as we said before are not interested in the fact of Iran wants Nuclear weapons or not but simple wants the oil and gas.



The punitive measures are to force Iran to halt uranium enrichment. That the USA, Britain and Germany do not want to halt uranium enrichment is obvious after they deliberate torpedoed a joint declaration from Iran with Brazil and Turkey based on which Tehran agreed to swap its low-enriched uranium on Turkish soil with nuclear fuel for a medical reactor.

The Ax of war lords, the USA the EU and Israel wants more sanctions for actions against Iran, simple on order of Israel, who wants instability as it is the only way they can extend their existence somewhat longer.

It will be obvious that the AX of war lords are all countries who have nuclear weapons themselves and which they still using. The depleted uranium bullets from the USA and Britain will cause for years and generations to come in Iraq and Afghanistan sickness and deformities. This is not a problem for the Ax of warlords they have the oil and gas and other minerals and that is all what counts. Thereby they need wars to keep their economies going and to keep their own people under constant fear of terrorist attacks, attacks that mainly exist in the minds of the leaders of the Ax of warlords of which they once in a while create one to keep the fear going.

Like in the time of the three WW2 war countries, Germany, Italy and Spain we have now USA, EU (incl.Germany again) and Israel. Different times same objects same murders, same cruelties, same lies.

Who will be next?

====================================================

18-06-2011
The main problem is that the evolutionist is trying to explain the origin in natural evolution. The creationists have only their faith and based on that faith they criticize the evolutionist. They should put forwards their own observations to proof their point, a simple you have to believe will not do nor is it scientifically convincing.


However, we should not forget that they are masters of negative criticism, although failing to produce any acceptable evidence. Their proof of the case is simple, belief, however this is a non-scientific proposal and therefore unacceptable. Another negative point of criticism is dragging old statements, some over 100 years old to support their case. What they should be doing is to stay up to date with the latest possibilities and daily research. They now try to defend the indefensible which is support for their faith and to belief in that only. However, just believe is not exactly scientifically.


Creationist also complains that scientist will not give them credit for their research to their God.
It will be obvious that, and we have respect for their convictions, it is rather difficult to give credit to a believe in a folks tale, no matter how good, how well written but without any acceptable proof.


We do believe that the story had a beginning, we do believe that the ones who made the store and the ones who left out and added to the story were good man, who believed in the many Gods available in that time. They no doubt believed the stories, however this does not proof the stories were correct.
The same stories are all over the Middle East although with differences in time and names and locations. The story of God is not proven in any form, yet.


It is therefore for the creationist an out of place habit to ridicule scientist. They do their out most to find the answer. We realise that this will be probably not in our lifetime but time will learn.


The unfounded criticism of the creationist although ridiculous only hides the insecurity of them, in the knowledge that they never will be able to proof an intelligent design, unless they will take the research
serious and add their knowledge to it.


The creationist instead of being negative should try to get some evidence to put them on a similar footing as the evolutionist, but they still want the honour for nature to be given to their God, without supplying any proof.


Without displaying any disrespect, it rather laughable that such a rambling on can even be accepted for print. This kind of display does not do the creationist any good, they do not support science, however, they want to be seen as such, they come with arguments good for a first year student unknown in this field. It is sad to see how a good man can be turned into rambling puppets with nothing to proof then their own ignorance and arrogance, and can only utter the words, believe.


Image that such a man find a pool of water looks in it and sees a face, telling others afterwards I have seen God, ridicules yes it is but not unknown. If you been in a audience man a man of God on stage then you realise how ridiculous it is, worst of all they are believed by the majority of the audience. They are willing to give their last cent to the man of God on stage.


It is a show, and the show shows that intelligent design does not exist but is merely a tool of a salesman to cash in. It is believe make belief, reality not included.


20-06-2011
The French, in priority still seeing Lebanon as their protectorate, see the actions they fulfill in the South of Lebanon as a divine right. They insist said that that the exercise was simple to see how they could react if Hezbollah would launch a missile attack against Israel. They themselves know how absurd this explanation sounds but as part of the EU and the EU stands against all that is not obeying either Israel or the USA. The real situation is that there is more change of an Israeli attack then that of Hezbollah, which is now more and more a political party. It does show however, the suspicions that Unifil, or at least the French contingent, was in Lebanon to assist Israel.


Western diplomats, this means diplomats from the USA and the EU, both the very warlords that wants Israel to attack Lebanon, says that the villagers' protests were manipulated by Hezbollah. Hezbollah has a strong influence over residents of the south, where Shia Muslims make up the majority of the population. However, this has to be seen as a typical Jewish invention taken over by the lacey diplomats of the West. It is not only the Shia Muslims but also the Christians and the Sunni Muslim residents who are rallied around Hezbollah, which they see as a legitimate resistance movement and their only defense against a potential war action of Israel.


The Lebanese government has assured Unifil that it supports the role of the UN forces and decided to dispatch another 2,500 to 3,000 soldiers to the south to reinforce the Lebanese army there. This has to be seen as one of the biggest mistakes the USA led Hariri Government could make.


It has now automatically given the Israeli the right to create more covert operations and the enact more so-called actions from Lebanon to Israel. This gives the Israeli Government the gun powder they need to blow up the situation. They will start with an accidental incident at the border, which is not accidental but carefully drafted by Israel. Israel can now say that the Lebanese army is not up to the job and that they in fact supporting Hezbollah. None of it is correct but lies always have worked in favor of the Israeli.


Unifil was set up in 1978 following an Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon, and was expanded after the 2006 war to prevent a new eruption of hostilities. It currently has 12,000 troops. This means that Israel can count on an extra 12000 man. Those 12000 men will be used to control Hezbollah while the Israeli IDF flattened the rest of Lebanon.



It was entrusted with assisting in the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, which called for a cessation of hostilities, the deployment of the Lebanese army in the south, and the disarming of non-governmental militias. But from the outset there was a problem with the wording of Resolution 1701. As a peacekeeping force, Unifil is supposed to prevent hostilities from both Hezbollah and Israel. But the wording of the resolution focuses on ensuring that Hezbollah is kept in check.



The UN Security Council, according to Resolution 1701, "authorizes Unifil to take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilized for hostile activities of any kind".


From the Israeli point of view, this paragraph means that Unifil has to have the force to ensure that it may be able to prevent Hezbollah from regaining its base in territories south of the Litani River - the area which, according to Resolution 1701, should remain free of arms.


The image and role of Hezbollah is now seen as a resistance movement defending Lebanon, and earned the movement more support and influence due to Unifil's operating on the ground in the south.

Unifil's operating term comes up for renewal at the end of August, amid continuing debate over its role, prerogatives and efficiency.

If it is up to the USA and the French then the south of Lebanon should be an occupied state, were the Unifill can randomly, just as the Israeli do in Gaza, invade villages ransack the dwellings and if needed to arrest of never to be seen again or simple be shot.


Both actions will be always accidental, as the statement will say, and Unifil did all they could to avoid bloodshed. The reality will be that the French will be acting as the Israeli frontline and henchman.

This in line a similar deal as the French had with the Germans in WW2 with the Vichy Government. And they are using similar excuses. However the facts are remaining, Unifil act as an invasion force for the USA and Israel in the South of Lebanon, whatever excuse they will give it.


However!


Israel will not wait for the United Nations Security Council they never did or have. They always have used the UN for their own benefit, and never obeyed any of the many orders from the UN. As General Gabi Ashkenazi, the chief of the general staff of the Israeli army said his forces would not hesitate to strike Lebanese towns and villages. That those villages are in a different Country, that the citizen of those towns and villagers have never done any harm to Israel is not a point for the Terrorist State of Israel, just kill them all.


We can count on it that the fantasy department of mosad will create a valid excuse in the eyes of the USA. Just as they did with the WMD in Iraq and the nuclear weapons in Iran. Fantasy pure fantasy.


What General Gabi Ashkenazi really said was We know we are lying; we know that it is not thru but we have to follow our instinct and that is to kill, to kill and to kill again. And so we will do time after time, and if there is nobody to kill any more then as we have done in the past, kill each other.


We have no doubt that the Israeli fantasy department is already fabricating surveillance photo's to show that Hezbollah is preparing for a war. Not only that but that the Syrians and the Iranise are having special nuclear plants near the Lebanese borders to strike Israel. It sounds absurd but then again who cares. The Governments of the USA and EU control the media so you can count on it they even have seen it, INSTEAD OF Journalist without borders it would be nice if there was an organization for journalist who reporting the truth. We realize that most Western based journalist would be arrested for just doing that as it would not suit the Western Governments.


The Lebanon Government has to obey the USA, but would they risk taking on Hezbollah and risk that the new Government of Lebanon is a Hezbollah led one.



Saad al-Hariri made a big mistake to take the side of the USA; it left Hezbollah into the Government circles. His infamous claim that Iran had manipulated Hezbollah and his siding with Unifill what in reality means the USA and his claims that Hezbollah and Syria were to blame for his father's death were simple said silly as he knew very well that it was Israel who organized the plot. His eagerness to side with the USA made him too loose sight of reality.


He knows very well that telling the real situation would him have blown up as well, no doubt that the Israeli's have already a bomb ready with his name on it.


The French behavior not as Unifill but as an occupied force have created resentment and created more support for Hezbollah. In fact if Lebanon falls foul on Israeli attacks and is made a part occupational Country in the hands of Israel, it will be solemnly due to Premier Hariri.


It is the lack of reality which makes the USA warlords believe any fantasy what Israel dreams up. When they will realize this it will be too late and the USA will be completely Jewish ruled, (it almost is now).


The United Nations Special Tribunal on Lebanon, which is scheduled to release its findings later this year, could point a finger at Hezbollah, accusing it of having played a role in the 2005 assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri, the late prime minister. This special Tribunal will know the real occurrence but will also have their order to accuse Hezbollah, as that is what the USA and Israel want.

The result will be that Unifill wants to disarm Hezbollah, then calls in the Israeli to help them and a new war is created.

And the outcome will be as planned with Lebanon a part of Israel controlled area. And that is the only point what counts, it is war they want. They hope to be able to accuse Iran from helping Hezbollah, this gives Israel the excuse to Attack Iran, Iran retaliate and the USA will attack as Iran has attacked Israel.

Never mind that Israel started the whole scenario, never mind that the USA warlord were ready to attack, never mind the tens of thousands of deaths.

They will have the oil and gas and that after all is what it is all about.



22-06-2011
The evolutions have so far never knowingly made a claim that they know how the heaven and earth had come into existence. They never will from science point of view, and they know it. They will be able in future with no doubt proof that a creation has taken place and that in theory the Earth could have been created out of the big bang theory. However, that on it self is no proof other then a suggestion based on probabilities, which could be true and could be not true.


However, even if hypothetical the great minds of the evolutionist, the supporters of the big bang theory could make sense out what had happened. Is that proof that the Almighty did not do this on the first day of his creation. If there was a big bang then there had to be something to make the big bang happening. Now we are back with the God Almighty. An Intelligent Creator only could have made such an occurrence possible and so we are back on day one.


Do the intellectual minds of the evolutionist realize that while calculating the stars distance the light years to travel dating the soil and fossils investigating the history of humankind they fail to see the obvious. The Creation itself. They know what they see but don't see it they hear it but do not listen they read it but do not comprehend what is written, they do not apprehend that all of the world and all what happens on it is an adornment with a show of Divine wisdom of the Almighty.



Hence, it is possible that a being of the highest degrees in science to which they can arrive, can give them unmingled enjoyment pleasure while their mind is obscured with devotion to the borders of the investigations of science. Is it possible that someone exist in the world that has his life devoted to the highest investigation of search and research of science, and still has doubts to the existence of the Almighty?


He is filled with pride of his achievements in scientific research, but still sees others with arrogance while looking down on them and sees them as inferior to his own. However, can he enjoy life with delightful emotions, the enjoyments, and happiness, which flow from the knowledge of standing in the shining of the Almighty?


What any good human being feels amides the various problems of life, he can in fact look no further then the result of his search and research. However, he has to accept that this is all he will have, as dead for him will be dead. No eternal salvation, no elevation of the mind, no enjoyment to meet the Creator. Just dead.


Even although those scientist reject the Bible, as a message from the Almighty there is no reason for its annunciations should be rejected altogether.


As researchers of the evolutions of earth, the constitution of the mind and the circumstances of our existence take into account every view and fact which may have bearing on his search and research. He will have to take into account the book, the Bible, and the actual existence fit the survival over thousands or maybe millions of years. Then they admit that such a book exists.


Many of the most illustrious beings who illustrated their existence on Earth given lead and example to others, having citrated and livid by the word of the Book and acting on it without any hesitation to the glory of the Almighty and successful promoting the welfare and happiness of mankind.


A simple fact that even the most severe objector must admit, and to used in his research and search for the truth and the probability that the book is indeed the Revelation.





24-06-2011
Science has quit clear proven that the world was not created in those seven days as the bible mentioned. Intelligence could not stand by this kind of stories anymore let alone to take it serious.



The bible in some quarters was seen as an institution to use it as an excuse for attracting funds while others saw it as a tool to create situations to keep in place the suppression of woman, slavery and indoctrination.



The bible was also used as an excuse to go to war. In short most of them found the bible intolerant and an obstruction for the development of the world. Most accepted that in the past the bible had its influence on the development of the world, but that time was now well far left behind.



However times are changing again, in the US they using it to drive in their eyes a new science into the school called Intellectual Design and Creationist vision of the beginning of the world as it was written in the bible. So far, the US courts have rejected that bid.



Muslim extremist using it to commit atrocities, Christians are using it to invade Muslim countries, the Jews using it to attack Muslims, Christians and anything else they do not like.
In addition, that all in the name of the bible or by divine right what they do not have. The point what all those religions are missing is the they all have the same origin, the Jewish (Hebrew) version of how it all begun.

The story book of the Hebrews, man made stories, man made characters, from hearsay and dreams.



Does this means that we have an religious upheaval, the answer on this is certainly not, Christians are leaving the church in droves, Jews are getting more intolerant to less fanatic Jews.



Muslims fanatics not only fighting each other but also anyone else that comes in their way, the Abramic religions are making therefore the world a dangerous place to live in.
However, the US right wing Christians, the intolerant Jews and the Jihad Muslims are missing the point.



Their intolerance is based on nothing, as all believe in the same God regardless how they call their God.



Who of the ones who believe, cares about the fact of the holy manuscripts are not exactly right, in the time that the Old Testament was written certain now established guarantees were not available, time was a different concept as it is seen now.



Certain intellectual scientist who simple declare that if it is not exactly right, then it cannot be true, passing by the fact that their own calculations are just as much in doubt.



People all over the world who have the possibility to think independently, found out that even if they did not agree with the bible, there was something what could not be explained.
Not only by the Christians but also by the Jews and the Muslims, and other believes such as Buddhism, Confusions, Taoists, Hindu etc...



There are still intellectual scientists who believe in time they will come up with the answer, but so far with every discovery made the mystery deepens and the hand of the Almighty is ever more visible.
They now know that before the bible was written the stories were handed by mouth, even the apostles were telling the stories by mouth long before they were written down.


As by all stories some parts are added some parts are left out, but one simple fact stay's as a shining light above all of it, the word of God



26-06-2011
Starting a war is never a business easy to start, continuing one is even more difficult and loosing it needs a lot of creative thinking to turn the war back in your favor and a lot of money.


Obama the Peace President did know the perfect solution to this. Just ask the congressmen for more money. And so he did, not bad for a Democratic President, you already received the peace price for an unknown reason. He managed to get the Congress to set aside an extra amount of $33 billion for the increase of the military contingent in Afghanistan, as President Obama insisted.


It was not an easy decision: 308 congressmen voted for, whereas a third of the members of the House of Representatives voted against it. A hundred and two of them represent the Democratic Party, which what simple mend that a Democratic President was assisted by the Republicans instead of the Democrats.


If that continued then the autumn election will see a land slide victory for the Republicans with a lame duck President. This did not stop him from by-passing Congress and to start the Libyan war and the Syrian one if he had the chance. As a Democrat Obama decided to side with the Republicans. The leaders of the Democratic majority unexpectedly had to deal with an action of angry Democrats.


Democrats correctly stated that the documents which emerged on Wiki leaks became yet another evidence to prove the inexpediency of the war in Afghanistan against the background of serious problems inside the USA. In fact a war at two fronts, against Afghanistan/Libya and against the economy. In most people's opinion he lost already on both fronts.


However, President Obama sticks to another opinion. In his first public statement about the publication of numerous documents about the war in Afghanistan Obama said that the situation was just another confirmation of the importance of the US-led strategy towards Afghanistan and Pakistan.


"While I am concerned about the disclosure of sensitive information from the battlefield that could potentially jeopardize individuals or operations, the fact is these documents don't reveal any issues that haven't already informed our public debate on Afghanistan," Obama said.


"Indeed they point to the same challenges that led me to conduct an extensive review of our policy last fall," added Obama, in his first public reaction to the release of the documents.
"For seven years, we failed to implement a strategy adequate to the challenge in this region," Obama said.
"That's why we have substantially increased our commitment there, insisted upon greater accountability from Afghanistan and Pakistan, developed a new strategy that can work," he said.


After he had finished his rambling on he had his $33 billion and the permission to send the additional contingent of 30,000 servicemen to Afghanistan. It just so happens that he prefers to turn a blind eye on the publication of nearly a hundred of confidential reports and continue to fund the politically and militarily hopeless war in Afghanistan for which the American people have to feed the bill.



The US administration disregarded the recent confession from the former chief UN inspector for arms control Hans Blix. The official said that the US and British governments relied on low-quality intelligence information and that Saddam Hussein did not pose a significant danger to the international community. "When we reported that we did not find any weapons of mass destruction they should have realized ... both in London and in Washington, that their sources were poor," he told a public inquiry in London on Tuesday.


"Their sources were looking for weapons, not necessarily weapons of mass destruction. They should have been more critical of that," Blix said.


The problem was simple that the Americans relied on the Israeli fantasies which created the weapons of mass destructions. They should have used their experience and have known that all info what comes out of Israel is by definition doubtful. The UK simple took over the instructions from the Americans which a normal procedure for the UK to do.


US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that 92 percent of the additional contingent (30,000 men) would be deployed in Afghanistan by the end of the year, and the number of US military men serving in Afghanistan would reach nearly 100,000.


The US administration is too naive to believe that such an increase of the contingent will allow making any more progress. The Afghani has learned over two hundred years of occupation and infiltration the principles of endless guerrilla warfare a long time ago.


This year, the US Congress managed to reach the $1 trillion level, which has been already spent on the operations since 2001. With no victory is insight, but the number of American losses continues to grow day by day.


They way Obama's plans are going then we will see indeed a severe reduction in the world population where by millions will die, country after country will be affected, the fire of war will spread to level previous disagreements, expansions and land grab will be the daily order of the day.


The Americans have no control over their Army or their government. The governments of the vassal states of the Americans will not ask the population permission to send troops into a war that is not theirs. What they do is fighting wars for Israel. The citizens are told that it is for Freedom but that is a lie, an illusion that fools only the weak minded or stupid. It is an Israeli fantasy which is typical of Jews.



The United States Congress, Senate and Government have been taken over by Jews and the Jewish bankers. They just voted to give Israel "Permission" to bomb Iran.


Why would Israel need the US' permission to bomb Iran? Israel cannot do this the distant is to long so they need re-filling planes and only the Americans are able to do this. It seems more logical that Israel uses the nuclear submarines in the Iranian sea, to launch missiles into Iran. Open fighting is not a skill Israel indulges themselves in. Coming in the dark of the night or hiding behind something else is more their style, something they then later call heroic fighters, we would call them cowards.

That is why the IDF is called outside Israel the Israeli Death Force, mainly against unarmed man, woman and children.


In the mean time the American Government has a debt of over 13 trillion and rising fast. It may be wonder people how long it will take before the Jewish bankers will stop financing. And if that will happen how will the Americans view their position.


The Jews were financing Hitler's action till they stopped it, and see what happened to the Jews after that. They were in that time never the flavor of the month, and neither are they that now.


You see the similarities, will it end the same? In the whole history of the Jewish people they always managed to press the self destruct button, it seems that they are willing to do it again.


28-06-2011
The world within we have to live!

Positive, neutral and peaceful comes to mind when we look out over the way we want to live our lives. We want the comfort and the easiness of the world within we living and shut out all what is not suitable for our way of life.

Then we have the ones who want greed, money, death and destruction, and so we arrive in the world of the Anglo-Americans. Not satisfied with almost killed of the populations of Australia and the North America’s and we talking here of over 200 million people simple slaughtered because the Anglo rulers wanted the land for themselves, they now have found a new way to slaughter their way through our world. The Middle East countries and the countries in the North Caucasus are now in their sight.

We had already the fact that the Anglo-Americans and their vassals in the UK decided to give the land of the Arab Palestinians to the Jews as bonus for their suffering during the Hitler Years, a suffering partly created by their own greed and partly made much larger then it was in reality, still their suffering and that of millions of others was intolerable. However where the Jews where rewarded with a land for their own, the other victims did not. Many lost land and possessions, and where the Jewish population was able to make restitution claims the much larger percentage of victims of the Hitler period were not.

That simple fact is related to greed. The Anglo states needed money urgently and the well known Jewish money lenders were willing to give, but for a price. The price was a state for the Jewish population of their own. This was based on the presumption in a book written thousands of years before as that a man had received a message from his God that all the land where he was standing what he could see would be his forever. The fact is that there was/is no proof, and that it is just one of the many Jewish stories from old times. Still it was enough for the Anglo countries, to grant them their wish and receive the money. It started also a worldwide protest that still continues against the Jewish state in special the way the see and handle non-Jewish people.

Twice the Anglo countries bean a war against Iraq, the second time they managed the destroy the complete infra structure of Iraq what will take up to a half century to build up against. It did cost the lives of hundred of thousands from both sides. However not satisfied with the destruction and killings in Iraq, the Anglo countries had set their sights on another project Afghanistan, however that was not so easily done as was projected, and although the deaths special on the innocent civilians of Afghanistan is rising, the Anglo killings are on going, regardless.
Was the old president G.W. Bush well known for his aggression and inclination for killing to get his hands on oil needed for the industry, his follower Obama was even worst although he play’s it more clever. He wanted the oil of Libya, so he first used the honey to bribe the government of Libya; they were appointed to the Security Council, the Human rights council and mentioned for their enormous progress in Human Rights. However Libya had a different opinion, they wanted the profit of the oil to be going to Libya and the people, and it was this that Obama could not allow. So cleverly the Tunisian population was activated to rebel, it gave the US an opportunity to unload weapons and goods for a rebellion in Libya. That however failed. Suddenly a report from Salum sighted an Israeli naval vessel, followed by two UK naval vessels unloading goods in the Salum bay near Bardiyah.

Three days after that a rebellion started in the east side of Benghazi. Israel and Britain always denied that they shipped arms to Benghazi, however in the light of the confessions of the French we can now safely accept that weapons were delivered to start the rebellion. The rest we know NATO was summoned by the USA to do the dirty work but only two countries and one forced under pressure (Italy) active supported the murder of Libya. We know that the UN resolution is simple ignored and that Ban ki Moon shines by keeping his mouth shut. He remark that the UN stood for Peace and Humanity can now be thrown into the trash bin, and as a reward he was appointed for a second term. It shows that the UN stands for war and destruction and in effect is nothing else than a money eating monster that serves nobody than the business of the Anglo countries.

Is the President of the US a ruthless war lord, who award himself all kind of nomination of no value and if of value by that action are dragged into the gutter, then NATO is nothing else than a terrorist organization desperate to kill so much as possible. It is probably for that reason that the US president appointed a Danish near brainless failed politician as the leader of the NATO.

NATO to it self is there for the only reason if one of the North Atlantic Countries is attacked or under stress of an attack, to protect those countries. Neither Iraq, Afghanistan Syria nor Libya is a danger for the North Atlantic Countries, but they are attacked any way they can. The NATO is breaking all international laws, breaking UN resolutions, is a murderous machine, with ruthless killers like Obama, Cameron and Sarkosy cashing in.

The point is how do they do it, and why is it that the populations of those Anglo Countries accept the murder and destruction of those countries what in most cases mean that those citizen have to pay a much higher tax to pay for the NATO follies, it is called MEDIA. Media entails the newspapers, the internet and the TV. In the not so far distant years we could believe that what was seen on the TV and read into the papers was correct, however today western media is is paid by the Anglo Countries and as such those media’s only report what is instructed by the Countries. The so-called journalist, although they are not they are just story writers with a given manuscript on what to write with only the way they write it left to the so-called journalists. Sao did those countries order to launch the Weapons of Mass Destruction story of Iraq, the readers and viewers believed it although there were many warnings that the so-called journalist were making up the stories out of something that did not exist. As it turned out there were no WMD. In the between the Anglo countries managed to kill thousands and to destroy the country’s infra structure.

The main reason for the Anglo countries was the oil, it was the same oil in the form of a promised pipeline, that formed the reason for the destruction of Afghanistan as the then Taliban Government did not build the pipeline on time. It is the same oil that is the reason for the all out attack on Libya after they did not wanted to give the oil to the USA, the Libyan government apparently wanted to kill all the civilians of Benghazi, it was a well though out plot and the Anglo Countries population sucked it up \as the so-called gospel truth although is was as with the WMD a complete lie. However it was enough for the UN to allow the killing of the Libyan civilians under the heading to stop the killing of the civilians. In UN eyes all the rebels were suddenly civilians and all the Libyans were all soldiers. That way if a rebel was killed the Anglo countries screamed about the death of civilians even if he had weapons and was fighting and every civilian killed by the NATO and that are many are automatically Libyan soldiers.

Let us be well aware this are Media fantasies and not reality, neither is the killing of civilians in Benghazi or the rapes by Libyan soldiers the latest out of the CIA fantasy book.
Facts are however, the killing by rebels of charity workers, the dragging out of their homes beaten and beheaded of civilians by the rebels, the rape and torture of woman by the rebels, the supply of arms by the Anglo Countries, a fact that is now admitted by France, the only country that seems to have still same honesty left, even while it broke the International laws and the Un resolutions. More coward countries special the USA but also the UK and Israel still do not own up. Although even last week it was observed that a group of more then thousands Anglo countries soldiers entered Libya from Tunisia.

The UN resolution allowed air strikes to stop Libyan planes, and they had only a couple of them and mostly old, from flying. Now they have ground troops hiding themselves as rebels as all cowards do, killing civilians as of there is not other day coming and have destroyed the complete infra structure of a country that had one of the highest living standards of North Africa and the Arab countries. The only countries that were helping active the Anglo countries are the dictatorial king ruled states of Saudi and Qatar. Countries were democracy is unknown and which countries have just taken over Bahrain all but in name under protection of the USA fleet.

Al jazeera a Qatar owned Media Company is one of the media who write exactly as they are ordered to. The WMD started with them, the rebellion fantasy started with them, the rape by Libyan soldiers started by them, the inflammation of the rebellion of Syria started by them although that part seems now to be taken over by sky TV of the UK probably as part of their takeover by the Murdoch empire the fantasy Media mogul who only reports what does not exist but does it at such a way that it looks believable.

We did seen the fantasy stories by the murder of Osama, the arrest of Bout and many others jailed in the US for crimes not committed. But needed to be out of the way so that business could take over were honest people where before.

So the next time you open your news paper (why bother) or listen to your news channel (again why bother) tell you self that you see or read stories special written for the public to entertain or to show the governments version of events, which in any case are never as what they say they are.

Surf the internet and the blogs put one and one together and you will get the right picture. Just realize that many blogs are written by countries secret services to infiltrate your mind, you will recognize them, just take the small entries, the private entries, the charity entries and the whole picture will come together, leave the Media to the dumb and dumber, they always believe what they are told like sheep’s led to the slaughter, and they still say thank you, and in the UK case they will add, “can we have some more”.



30-06-2011
The main problem is that the evolutionist is trying to explain the origin in natural evolution. The creationists have only their faith and based on that faith they criticise the evolutionist. They should put forwards their own observations to proof their point, a simple “you have to believe” will not do nor is it scientifically convincing. However, we should not forget that they are masters of negative criticism, and have failed to produce any acceptable evidence.

Their proof of the case is simple, just belief, however this is a non-scientific proposal no proof is brought forwards and therefore as such is unacceptable. An other negative point of criticism is dragging out old statements, some from people who lived more then over 100 years ago to support their case. They did pass by the development of science progress and the change of public view. What they should have be doing is to stay up to date with the latest possibilities in science and daily research. They now try to defend the indefensible which is support for their faith and to belief in that only. However this is based on a simple story gathered together and with more holes in it than an Emmertaler Cheese.

Creationist also complains that scientist will not give them credit for their research to their God. Here the big problem is that there is no indication that such a deity does exist and that they have failed so far to give only the slightest of proof of the existence of such a deity.
It will be obvious that, and we have respect for their convictions, it is rather difficult to give credit to a believe in a folks tale, no matter how good, how well written but without any acceptable proof.

We do believe that the story had a beginning, we do believe that the ones who made the store and the ones who left out and added to the story were good man, who believed in the many Gods available in that time. They no doubt believed the stories, however this does not proof the stories were correct.
The same stories are all over the Middle East although with differences in time and names and locations. The story of God is not proven in any form, yet.
It is therefore for the creationist an out of place habit to ridicule scientist. They do their out most to find the answer. We realise that this will be probably not in our lifetime but time will learn.

The unfounded criticism of the creationist although ridiculous only hides the insecurity of them, in the knowledge that they never will be able to proof an intelligent design, unless they will take the research
Serious and add their knowledge to it. The creationist instead of being negative should try to get some evidence to put them on a similar footing as the evolutionist, but they still want the honour for nature to be given to their God, without supplying any proof.

Without displaying any disrespect, it rather laughable that such a rambling on can even be accepted for print. This kind of display does not do the creationist any good, they do not support science, however, they want to be seen as such, they come with arguments good for a first year student unknown in this field. It is sad to see how good man can be turned into rambling puppets with nothing to proof then their own ignorance and arrogance, and can only utter the words, believe.

Image that such a man find a pool of water looks in it and sees a face, telling others afterwards I have seen God, ridicules yes it is but not unknown. If you been in a audience man a man of God on stage then you realise how ridiculous it is, worst of all they are believed by the majority of the audience. They are willing to give their last cent to the man of God on stage.
It is a show, and the show shows that intelligent design does not exist but is merely a tool of a salesman to cash in. It is believe make belief, reality not included as so long you have the cash!


Text-only version of this page | Edit this page | Manage website | Website design: 2-minute-website.com