august 2011

02/08/2011




Obama done it, signed in the ceiling raising debt proposal that will bring the US over the 100% GDP. After the House and the Senate gave their approval Obama followed quick. He made the promise that trillions would be saved. However the same promise was made every time the debt ceiling was raised. That panic what was not really a panic but an situated position for the coming election so that none of the parties can get the blame if it all goes terrible wrong. However, that wrong does not exist as so long the US support the Jewish State by all what they do legal or as it mostly is illegal.



Now it is time to go profit taking and what better place to go then to Europe, where the countries and their ECB still not have grasped the simple basic of co-coordinating different countries and cultures into a one performing unit. Where personal profits are more important then the well being of the EU. The basic mistake was made in the early beginning when the enthusiasm for the single currency in Europa made them overlook the obvious; countries that do not play by the unwritten rules. Mediterranean countries are notorious for playing their own game in which money is not a problem, that is so long it is someone else money, or someone else who can be forced to pay the bills.



Are there really panics about the European countries with a high GDP spending? No not really it is more the banks forcing hands by screwing up the rates via the rating agencies. Rating agencies which are controlled by the US administration. The US does not want a stabilize Europe with his own currency, that could mean in the future that the dollar is is exchanged for the Euro as the main basked for international trade. So the rating agencies are instructed to pick the countries of one by one and force them with the help of the IMP and the ECB bankers to accept bail outs they actual do not need. However the profit is the main attraction for the bankers and the richer Eu countries, therefore other EU countries are forced to accept. Not doing so means that the bankers screw up the rates to such a height that a bail out is needed if only to pay for the sudden sharp increased rates.



This is called profit taking, the banks were the reason the recession started and now they are the ones who taking the profits. The bond yields of Spain and Italy are already soaring, as the bankers smell the profit after yet another big sell-off in markets, yields on benchmark 10-year Spanish and Italian bonds peaked at 6.45 per cent and 6.25 per cent. The premiums Madrid and Rome pay to borrow over Germany also reached new euro-era highs of 404 and 384 basis points. Both the yields and premiums are close to levels that pushed Greece, Ireland and Portugal into bail-outs. If Spain and Italy dared to resist then a even higher premium may be expected to force them into a accepting of a bail out they actual do not need, do not want but are forced upon them by the greedy bankers.



Spain and Italy will not be the last ones, Belgium will be next as the bankers by screwing up the rates forcing debt to increase sharply. France probably after that, however if they continuing to support the US in their illegal war actions the rating agencies will be stopped by the US administration to up the France premiums and keep it at the same level as the preferred level in the UK an country that also has an sharp increasing percentage of debt over GDP but receives a preferable view from the US concerning the premiums which are kept low as so long the UK does the US bidding. Still the premium France pays to borrow over Germany hit a euro-era high of 75bp. On this moment it is difficult to see what action could be taken to stop the rates for Spain and Italy to climb higher. Stock market shares tumbled so that either on Monday following profit taking can start in earnest.



An statement by Italy and Spain that they will 100% support the US actions and take an active part in it would have the result that the rates would go down and the countries could avoid a bail-out. However Spain and Italy as opposed to the UK, France and Germany are not against the US actions but neither do they actively support them. So long they take that stand the premiums will go up to the level that the debt need an bail out. The fault line in the US/bankers approach is that after the debts are secured the countries forced to accept the not needed bail-outs will attempt to find yet another bank security not based on the US or Israeli demands.



It all could have been avoided if the ECB and the government of the EU countries had used common sense and had included, what was advised many times before, an non EU bail-out clause. In such a case the countries would have to make deals with the IMF/World bank/ECB on their own and no money from the EU would have been involved. However, politicians knew better and did fall face forwards into the bankers trap. Then again politicians are mostly people who in principle have no inclination about anything then as what they are told by their civil servants. Their knowledge comes after years and in most cases they are already replaced by others who also missing the basic knowledge. Hence they are an easy prey for profit makers and can we blame the profit makers?



The best way forwards would be to offload the Mediterranean countries out of the EURO and keep the stronger countries as was initial the taken initiative. That profit taking is taken place is due to an uncertainty of further bail-outs are possible, is the EURO mechanism large enough to deal with Spain and Italy. Fears about further downwards moves by the US and the UK has led to frenzied buying of perceived safe-haven debt including Germany, the US via the UK markets. The point is that there is no reason to suddenly to increase the rates level other then profit taking. If the bankers via the rating agencies managing to in crease the rates above the 7% then there is simple no alternative for countries to accept bail-outs or simple default on their loans.



The rating agencies could hold themselves together and for once in their existence look at the reality instead of profit taking and ignore the pressure from the US administration and the International Banks and leave the rates at a acceptable level. It is important to see how the rating agencies will react after the employment figures of the US. It will have no doubt that the republican orientated Standard and Poor, will lower the rating if the figures are anything less then an steady grow of employment. It is doubtful of those figures will be anything then just a grow if not flat. In that case Standard and Poor will an hour after the figures are made public lower the rating, to give the republicans an flying start for the coming election.



However, the principle of the US is to kick someone when they are down, but would others give the US a kicking now they are as expected going down? It would be against the US principle of kicking someone when they are down but never get a kicking your self. Will it end, maybe if the EU ECB gets his act together and sees the EU as more important than the profit taking the IMF and the rating agencies which are in fact the banks. However if the ECB and the first ministers of the EU continuing to take the rating agencies and the banks profit taking as more important than a stable EU then it will not end but country after country like domino stones will fall.



However our bet is that the EU leaders will prefer the profits from the US above a stable Europe.
The US wants an unstable Europe as that means profit for them. If the EU would solve the rating/bail out problem, then we can guarantee that the US would create a European based war either between Moldavia/Ukraine, Kosovo/Serbia or Greece/Albania. One thing is for sure they will all they can do to keep the EU unstable at all costs. One thing we can be sure off, the EURO situation will be solved as soon as the unstable Mediterranean countries are removed from the EURO countries.







04-08-2011
If the markets around the world expected that the only was up, again after the debt ceiling was raised in the US, they by now will have found out that this is most certainly not the case, (see our article 12/06/2010) as they now have found out. Worldwide the stock market is falling in Western orientated markets. The UK will say it has all to do with the EURO but Euro phobia is a typical UK thing. The main fact is that there is world wide doubt of the US can stay out of a new recession, special now the GDP level is over 100%. Even the rating agencies will not be able to sustain that all is well in the US with the financial debacles falling around their ears. Doing something about it is a different scenario all together as going against the Administration could make heads roll in those agencies.



On this moment the heaviest falls are in the UK and Germany, with bonds falling in all countries selected by the rating agencies as doubtful, except Ireland. Ireland could have a falling rate as well if they were willing to take up the US administration offer and supply man and material to Libya and assist the US in their Libya attacks. So far Ireland has refused and as such they are punished. However this aggressive attitude of the US and the UK could quit easily backfire if an second recession will take hold.


In the US that will result that more people are losing their homes and income, and in the UK it will mean higher taxes and withdrawal of social security components. It is here where the so-called experts in economy have their figures wrong! In their limited view the economy does only well if the markets are doing well. That as is proven is however not the case and they know it, but as they are tied vastly to the markets they have to go with the markets flow or find a blaming point, in the UK that is the EURO, although as they it has nothing to do with the present volatile markets, where the main reason is the insecurity of the US balancing of the books.


The old question has to be asked, what does make an economy run proper. The answer is a simple one, one that will be recognized by every economist in the world; the spending power of the people.
The logical solution is to increase the peoples spending power, as that would result in higher spending in shops, which increased production therefore employs more people who earn a wage what then will be spent in the shops the circle is round. However if a government takes away the part that can be spent in the shops in the form of higher taxes as they do now, then there will be no spending in the shops. No higher production, no more people in work. In fact the people will start cutting down on items they need to avoid paying the high taxes. A fact that can be seen in the UK where more and more people leave the car at home. Again the governments have found an alternative for taxable spending. Tax all the items people need to live on and with as they will be needed, and guarantee the that tax will come in.


In many countries but again special the Netherlands and the UK this has as a result that the energy prices are going through the roof, many people cannot afford the prices anymore and cutting down on gas and electricity. In the UK that have led to the introduction of so-called standing charges. This means if you do not use any gas or electricity but have a contract with an supplier they can still charge the standing charges, which are obvious taxed. While in the Netherlands they now intend to restrict rising of prices without government permission, that is not so in the UK where the tax on house fuel is still seen as a luxury and over that luxury item an luxury tax has to be paid, the VAT. The fact that it is a necessity for most people in middle and lower classes is not of the UK government concern. The point behind it is if they cannot heat they still can eat and if they cannot eat they will die and special for the poor on social payments and for pensioners on state benefit their death will be money saved for the government.

A kind of killing them off slowly without the need for special camps to kill them off.

The same system is used in the US however there the people from colder area's are moving to the south where heating is not needed and the survival rate is higher, however, the principle is the same.


If countries would go back to the economic certainty of spending taxes on the people instead of fighting wars where ever the US tells them to fight, less increase of taxes would be needed, people would be able to spent, shops would be able to buy in, factories would produce, more staff would be needed, more wages would be paid, more tax would come in, while the spending power of the people would go up. For the government it would mean that filling your own pockets first would be a thing of the past.


While man can doubt of there will be a second dip, it easily can be avoided by silencing the rating agencies as they are the ones who creating the financial trouble world wide, and we may expect on US Administration instructions, as nothing in the US is done with out the Administrations control via one of the over 100 special agencies not mentioned, but who do exist and control every facet of the US life and economy.


For the economic specialist they have lost track of reality, they can only think in market terms forgetting the basics of economy. The stock markets cruised once again into the red mainly in the banking and shopping section. The anxiety about the decline of American economic recovery and the European debt crisis the markets are still held in its grip. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, seeing the problems in the euro zone have discussed this with each other once again. Wall Street yesterday suffered the biggest loss in two years. The Dow Jones index ended 4.3% lower, the broader S & P 500 composite fell 4.8%. No funds from the Dow Jones closed higher, the S & P 500 fell 497 funds in the minutes Nasdaq lost 5.1% Technology Fair.


Asian stock markets closed this morning in the minutes in Tokyo, the Nikkei index closed 3.7% lower. Other important markets in Asia showed heavy losses on the Friday show.
The euro was Friday before the opening of the exhibition is worth $ 1.4086 from $ 1.4150 at the end of the European exchange trading Thursday. The price of a barrel of crude oil fell 2.4 percent to U.S. $ 84.56.
Investors are paralyzed by the fear that the U.S. economy falls into recession and drags the global economy, combined with fears that the crisis in the euro zone expands if the rating agencies are not better controlled. According to a German government spokesman Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy by telephone today mainly about the issues discussed in the euro zone. Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero would also join the conversation.


The problem is that the stock markets are over sold giving companies an higher value then they have in reality, just as the rating agencies upping the rates while in reality there is not economical reason to do so other then to give their controlling bankers the extra profit.
According to a spokesman on Thursday, the European Central Bank does things 'too little, too late'. They only acting on the mistakes they made without putting in place the machinery what would stop further bail-outs. According to him this afternoon, all eyes are focused on key U.S. jobs report. "Hold your breath as it is disappointing," and so it is.


More and more investors fear that the world economy will be into another recession before the month ends, that the double dip would be a fact. The debt crises in Europe and the U.S. in July cast a dark shadow over the trust. Private investors leaving the markets in droves.

No less than 59% of private investors weight double dip somewhat or very likely. Global economic data are not convincing enough at this moment although we do not not expect new recession. The economies in the U.S. and Europe falter, but still show a slight growth. We expect this modest growth continues, the exception could be the UK where debts are rising and consumer spending is slowing down, meaning a fall in taxation for the government in a time that they need more funds to adhere to their obligations to the US regarding Afghanistan and Libya. Not doing so would lower their ratings by the US rating agencies and with a very high spending at GDP level trouble could be around the corner. However there are a number of pillars which the UK can clings to. The business community is strongly in favor, so strong cash positions and we can expect various investments.


Moreover, the emerging markets in the world economy a boost. In China, inflation to peak, which creates space for greater economic growth. Other emerging markets performing strong. The western markets are nearly in 100% control of the bankers via the rating agencies and therefore they acting as one unit, if one goes down they all go down, it shows the US rating influence into the Western markets. A better financial control on markets and their players is a call that is made for many decades. However, the power is with the banks who control the governments, the government got themselves because of US obligations into wars, in debt. That debt is controlled by the US controlled rating agencies and is used as a lever to force government in obeying the US wished.
Question is, what will happen, when the US not longer supports Israel, the banks will raise the interests and refuse further loans, the US would collapse. Hence the US has to support Israel, for the same reason the Western countries have to support the US.

As the rating agencies have shown they are able to demolish the financial stability of a country that does not obey the US wishes. And this will continuing until the US fall in the hole they are digging now.


06-08-2011
As we have predicted in the article of 02-08-2011 the rating agency did indeed for-filled their duty and lowered the US government financial rating to AA+. The Chinese agency will no doubt follow quick and the farce will be on his way. This is nothing else then to give the republicans an head start for the coming election, the principles of S&P are well known in that direction. It would be more serious if Moody and Fitch would enter the lowering race as well. This could trigger an avalanche that not could be controlled as to many parties are already near to each other throats to stop if they even would get the change.


So what is an rating agency and why are they seen in the Western world as so important? In the short version a rating agency is a company that assigns credit ratings for issuers of certain types of debt obligations as well controls the debt instruments themselves.



In most cases, the issuers of securities are companies, special created entities, state and local governments, non-profit organizations, or national governments issuing debt-like securities (i.e., bonds) that can be traded on a secondary market. A credit rating for an issuer takes into consideration the issuer's credit worthiness, and affects the interest rate applied to the particular security being issued.



The value of such security ratings has been widely questioned since the early nineteenths and even more so after the 2007-09 financial crisis. In 2003 the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission submitted a report to Congress detailing plans to launch an investigation into the anti-competitive practices of credit rating agencies and issues including conflicts of interest. As credit agencies have narrow ties with International bankers and as such there are severe conflicts of interests, this shows once again by the down grading by S&P to be seen as an republican starters position. More recently, ratings downgrades during the European Euro debt crisis of 2010-11 have drawn criticism from the EU and many individual countries.



Credit ratings are used by investors, issuers, investment banks, broker-dealers, and governments. For investors, credit rating agencies increase the range of investment alternatives and provide independent, easy-to-use measurements of relative credit risk; this generally increases the efficiency of the market, lowering costs for both borrowers and lenders. This in turn increases the total supply of risk capital in the economy, leading to stronger growth. Although as it is proven it also opens the door for un-controlled over lending therewith opening the capital markets to categories of borrower who might otherwise be shut out altogether: small governments, start up companies, hospitals, and universities.



Issuers rely partly on credit ratings as an independent verification of their own credit-worthiness and the resultant value of the instruments they issue. Significant bond issuance must have at least one rating from a respected agency for the issuance to be successful. In reality there have to be at least two ratings before real investors are willing to subscribe.



Issuers also use credit ratings in certain structured finance transactions. For example, a company with a very high credit rating wishing to undertake a particularly risky research project could create a legally separate entity with certain assets that would own and conduct the research work. This special entity would then assume all of the research risk and issue its own debt securities to finance the research. However this is an expensive way.



However, this risk would not lower the parent company's overall credit rating because the entity would be a legally separate entity. Conversely, a company with a low credit rating might be able to borrow on better terms if it were to form such an entity to of load the risk without losing his own rating. That way, if the entity were to fail, the lenders would have recourse to the assets owned by this entity. This would lower the interest rate the entity would need to pay as part of the debt standing.



The firm expects that the effective interest rate it pays on the A-rated bonds will be much less than the rate it must pay on the BB-rated bonds, but that, the amount it must pay for the total capital it raises will be less than it would pay if the entire amount were raised from a single bond offering.
There has been criticism in the wake of large losses in the collateralize debt obligation market that occurred despite being assigned top ratings by those. In the past, most highly rated (AAA or Aaa) debt securities were characterized by low volatility and high liquidity—in other words, the price of a highly rated bond did not fluctuate greatly day-to-day, and sellers of such securities could easily find buyers.



This means that even though a rating agency could be correct in its opinion that the chance of default of a structured product is very low, even a slight change in the market's perception of the risk of that product can have a disproportionate effect on the product's market price, with the result that an ostensibly AAA or Aaa-rated security can collapse in price even without there being any default (or significant chance of default). It is in this the the main critic is directed as an AAA rating can be without an noticeable reason be-lowered by the rating agencies. The critic state influence by bankers is the most likely reason for a sudden lowering as an more easy profit taking can find place. It is seen that this was the case in Europe by the sudden lowering of the Irish and Portuguese ratings, an financial rate increase was followed bringing the countries in a financial difficult position they would not have been in of the rating agencies had not changed the rating.



Credit rating agencies Standard & Poor's on Friday (local time) lowered as was expected if the employment figures would be lower then expected, the credit status of the United States for long-term loans decreased by one step to AA-plus. It is the first time that the world's largest economy the best possible rating from S & P loses American bonds were once viewed by many as the safest investment in the world. But S & P are now lending less reliable than similar products on the German or British government. The company said it is concerned about rising U.S. debt and put also questioned the ability of politics to the financial problems energetically tackle.



Credit rating agencies seek their "ratings" to indicate how reliable is a country to repay interest and principal payments on government bonds. S & P's main competitor, Moody's announced earlier this week that the U.S. its AAA status may provisionally retained after Congress acute payment problems occurred by agreeing to increase the maximum allowable debt.
The deal linked to the austerity plan of $ 2.1 trillion over ten years is much lower than S & P would have preferred they say. The rating agency earlier that he had a saving of $ 4 trillion necessary to the country back to financial health. Although that is in line with an earlier article (02-08-2011), the lowering is more seen as an opening starter for the Republican party for the coming election.



A lower rating can have negative consequences: a greater risk because investors think they run, they can demand a higher interest rate. The slightly lower state of the U.S. press also still a great reliability. S & P does provide that the status of the U.S. term will further decrease. That could have happened if the government fails to implement promised cuts.
Not only S & P has less confidence in the U.S. credit rating. The Chinese credit rating agency Dagong reduced the status of the country this week for the second time since November and now gives the U.S. an A rating, two levels below the maximum.


On the other hand many countries feel that the situation could not go on much longer. China and other important countries will stop buying dollars and supporting the U.S. economy, China is now focusing more on Europe and the entire U.S. economy will come in difficulties in the coming years. The Benelux, Germany, France and the Scandinavian countries should keep the EURO and offload the Mediterranean countries to stabilize their economies. They would avoid the US and UK situations. In America nearly 50 million Americans use Food Stamps / food stamps. Millions put their home and live in tents. Infrastructure dramatically in the U.S. and liabilities amounted to 100-150 thousand billion dollars! (Pension, medicare etc are all financed with borrowed money).
In the UK they have the larger proportion of poor children and under the poor level of house holds.



The warmongering for oil forced on by corporate America will push America to the limit without that it archives to aim they have set. Already they are offsetting their war costs onto the NATO countries with Britain picking up most of the costs. The reason is that by saving the money they do not have to spent on the wars as they are paid by NATO and Britain they can take the measures to ensure that the U.S. "economy" just keeps running. It makes the situation in the world very worrying as many countries will see the decline of the US as an change to go there own way. The fact that the US tries to disorganize Europe with the permission of the European governments will lead to an sudden stop id people have enough.



In Britain the ty is slowly turning against the coalition, In Germany Merkel is in a minority position and in France the president is but on his way out. The Mediterranean countries certainly do not love the US as they are targeted by the Obama regime visa the rating agencies for pure profit making.
More and more the comments worldwide are turning against the US, and that is more dangerous than the lowering of the ratings by the rating agencies, even the US does have not enough fire power to silence all the critics, and that is where the danger lurks.


10-08-2011
We watched this morning the first minister of Britain once more making promises which already will be broken before they reach the news papers. The good thing with this Cameron is that you know ad forehand that what ever he will say it will be for audience only and does not have any relation ship with reality.

We will deal harshly with the criminals he said, if his record is anything to go by then they will be freed instantly. They will be jailed he said. The question is where? Jails are closing and overloaded.
Those children 12/13 years of age should not be on the street, we agree and most of them \were indeed not on the street. It were the 17/20 years old who were doing the looting and the violence, but then again children sound better to make an impression, it would not work in any other country then Britain.

They have no respect for the police,he said. Well here is a point he should ask Thatcher and Major about they came up with the idea to stop and search. Every stop and search victim is almost automatic an enemy of the police from that time onwards. The British police has misused the stop and search completely. With that they created an generation of youngsters who never will forgive the police for this. Many youngsters are simple stopped because the police did not like their face.
Some police search was nothing else then actions of pedophiles in uniform. Others were more direct in getting arrests going. Youngsters with dogs were stopped the dog kicked by the police(accidental they said) the dog snarled and the youngster was taken in for having a suspected dangerous dog. The action failed mostly if the youngsters had a private solicitor, but if they had a so-called legal aid solicitor that it was always decided that thedog was dangerous even when that was not the case. It was the police just to get an conviction and with that they created yet another youngster who sees the British police as gangsters, what in many cases is correct as the past has proven.

The killing of a young man in Tottenham was such an act, why killing are thos police so badly trained that they cannot select an disabling side on the body but want to kill instantly and not for the first time. We have in our country that kind of police, but they do not kill they disable instead.
In Britain the victim is always killed for no apparent reason then for incompetent training as a marksman. The writer was in the army a marksman and could shoot to disable and did so although he could have killed just as easy.

However the result of lack of training and the killing of a young man will now cost Britain an over 100 million on damages, it will keep businesses failing, and will cost millions and millions before al the cases are dealt with. The Human rights solicitors will then ad an other compensation round on top of that so that we may expect that the 4 days of unrest will cost Britain many hundreds of millions.
At the same time due to the US debt ceiling rise the stock markets crashes and that all since Thursday last week. The First minister of Britain found the stock market the rioting and the looting no reason to break his holiday. He was forced by his party to come home but did so very reluctant.

Cameron condemned the scenes of violence. Speaking outside Downing Street he said:
"I have come straight from a meeting of the Government's COBRA committee for dealing with emergencies where we have been discussing the action we will be taking to help the police to deal with the disorder on the streets of London and elsewhere in our country.
"I have also met with the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and the Home Secretary to discuss this further. And people should be in no doubt that we will do everything necessary to restore order to Britain's streets and to make them safe for the law abiding.
"Let me first of all completely condemn the scenes that we have seen on our television screens and people have witnessed in their communities. These are sickening scenes, scenes of people looting, vandalizing, thieving, robbing. Scenes of people attacking police officers and even attacking fire crews as they try to put out fires.
"This is criminality pure and simple and it has to be confronted and defeated. I feel huge sympathy for the families who have suffered. Innocent people who have been burned out of their houses and to businesses who have seen their premises smashed, their products looted and their livelihoods potentially ruined.
"I also feel for all those who live in fear because of these appalling scenes that we have seen on the streets of our country. People should be on no doubt that we are on the side of the law abiding. Law abiding people who are appalled by what has happened in their own communities. As ever police officers have shown incredible bravery on our streets in confronting these thugs, but it is quite clear that we need more, much more police on our streets and we need even more robust police action. And it is that that I have been discussing in COBRA this morning.
"The Metropolitan police commissioner said that compared with the 6000 police in the street last night in London there will be some 16,000 officers tonight there will be aid coming from police forces up and down the country and we will do everything necessary to strengthen and assist those police forces that are meeting this disorder. There's already been 450 people arrested, we will make sure that court procedures and processes are speed-ed up and people should expect to see more, many more arrests in the days to come.
"I am determined, the Government is determined that justice will be done and these people will see the consequences of their actions. And I have this very clear message to those people who are responsible for this wrongdoing and criminality. You will feel the full force of the law and if you are old enough to commit these crimes you are old enough to face the punishments and to these people I would say this, you are not only wrecking the lives of others, you are not only wrecking your own communities, you are potentially wrecking your own life too.
"My office this morning has spoken to the speaker of the House of Commons and he has agreed that parliament will be recalled for a day on Thursday so I can make a statement to parliament and we can hold a debate and we are all able to stand together in condemnation of these crimes and also to stand together in determination to rebuild these communities. Now, if you will excuse me there is important work to be done.

What he was meaning was that he had to go back on holiday. That he was the reason for the riots the looting probably did not come up in his mind as judging a situation is never his strongest side.
He made the poor population poorer, raised taxes, keep the fuel for car and homes artificial high where other countries curtailed the fuel companies,Britain encouraged them to raise the prices as the added VAT (luxury) tax brought in millions. While other countries lowering the fuel prices Britain put them up. Where other countries lowering the income tax for the lower incomes, Britain put them up.

It would be seen an good if the tax was spent on the British, this is however not the case, it is spent on America and the American actions such as Afghanistan and Libya. For America Cameron is willing the spent billions, for the British he does not spent a penny. Let the British people ask themselves, what has Cameron done in that first year and the answer has to be NOTHING for the British. He put up the taxes to spent it on wars, roads are falling to pieces, people living on the street, but Cameron’s friends and himself are cashing in. For the Americans Cameron is their man as he fight the US battles with British money, for the British he is a scroungers who live the high life on poor peoples costs who he then call scroungers. However, he is the one who lives for free, eat for free, drives for free flies for free and demands more from the British so that he can please his American friends.

What he does not realize that if the looters organize themselves the next time then he will have a battle on his hand he cannot win. When the looters and demonstrators in Syria went on the street he said that is a good thing as Assad is an dictator, and maybe so but Assad is an elected president, Cameron appointed himself, Cameron has no respect for the British people who he sees
as milk cows on one hand and rich collaborators on the other hand. This is man who tells us to support the Save the Children Funds and then is responsible for the killing of them in Afghanistan and Libya. This is the man who throws British money around the world to buy recognition just as Blair did and ignores the poor in his own country. This is the man who said that people have a right on a proper road to walk on and who then in his own country let people walk through the mud as the roads are there but not done up for years. This is the man who said I will protect the poor, the elderly and the disabled and then takes everything away. This man is an self appounted dictator who even ignores parliament.


Since he appointed himself we have seen Quangos increasing, EMA cuts, Public cuts, unemployment going up, it is now split in four groups, the unemployed, the job seekers, the course attendance and the unemployed deliberate deprivation for illegal reason of their benefits. Together the unemployment is 11% separated and only mentioned the unemployed it still stand on4%. Wages are frozen or lowered Tuition fees trebled, fuel costs doubled, hundreds of millions for the Libyan war to please America. Cut in armed forces cuts in Policing Council grant cuts, But Bankers with higher bonuses, more traveling for the Government more wine and dine for the government and MP's spending on the Up.


And what is his excuse? It is Labours fault! This is of course the answer of a coward, the level of GDP under Brown the last first minister of Britain stood at 59% it is now 80%. Basic none of the ones now in government regardless of that is from Cameron's party of the traitors of the middle class the liberals, they have not a clue of what in reality is going on. The riots were simmering for a long time the whole world was aware of it, except Cameron. Whole the world knows that if you want to to increase prosperity you have to have people who can spent money, as money buys good, goods need to be produced and for production you need workers who need a wage that the can spent in the shops. Stop people from buying will stop production and lay people off. The world knows that but Cameron..... well he does not have a clue, the only one worst, is his finance minister Osborne.
Osbourne like the looters, you promise the good time and then rob them blind.

What Cameron created in the last year is a coming generation with contempt for authority. An contempt then can exploit just as it did in other countries. What Cameron will do is obvious as soon as his pockets and that of his friends are full he resigns and lives the good live always be remembered as the first minister who managed to destroy Britain complete.!



12-08-2011
If there ever was a clearer example of a quick solution, than look no further.

The Government in his wise decisions to save so much money as possible found the following solution.
It is an old one, done up a little to make the effect and the result go faster.

It was near one and a half percent of the old and older disabled whom where at risk 10 years ago. This figure is now expected to be nearly 10 percent, of what will be at risk of an early death. We can therefore speak of a successful measure by the Government as such to reduce costs.

However, this is not enough and new measures are brought into existence to let other groups also fall under those quick solution measures.

What can man ask would that entail? In short, declare sick people fit for work. Declare disabled people not longer disabled. Declare old people simple to old.

In other words let the sick work till they collapse. Let the disabled look after them selves. Let the old just be old.
This measure is already enforced to older disabled who cannot pay for the care themselves.
What is behind this rush to eliminate those groups soon as possible from the benefits list?
Too save money, money what need to be given to parties who squandered there capital, and now wants handouts, read benefits, from the State. Those are the same squanderers who having critic on the Government for handing out too much benefits.
And the State, they do so. After all Government is only for a short period and alternative incomes have to be persuading for after that period. An advisor ship or a directorship would do of course nicely by the Institutions just given large handouts, a benefit.

Let us make it clear, the way the Government sees the old and the older disabled is as the down and outs. If they have to go on living, well that is there own choice.

The Government is willing to support them to the old peoples or nursing home but that only on the obvious condition and expectation that they die.

The Government is also willing to support them to stay in their own home. That is if they are willing to put up with the minimum of help. If they want more they are slung in an older people or nursing home. And they are encouraged of making their own decisions.
Too eat and no heat, or to heat and not to eat. That is a reasonable decision to ask for and the Governments result will be the same, money saved. This money can then again be handed out as a benefit to the rich institutions that squandered their own money.

Fair or not fair.

For the older and older disabled people it is not fair, the older people worked most of their live and now they are old have to put up with the fundamental choice of eat or heat.

The older disabled and many of them are severely disabled, this due to lack of medical care because they are old, also have a choice. The choice is to die now or to die later. They also have to make the daily choice if they are able to, to eat or to heat.

From the Government view it is fair. These are older people they had their life and if they have the money than there is no objection to go on living. If they have not why should the Government pay for it, they getting their basic pension they should be happy. And if they have a belt to tie they better do so or die.
What the older disabled concerns this are troublemakers. They do not fit in an older people’s home or normal nursing home but need special homes and care.
That cannot be done as that cost money. They cannot say to the rich you don’t get your benefit handout because we have to take care of the older disabled. So, the choice is simple, if we do not have a bed they better are dead.

And does this work you may ask? Yes it does the risk group has been increased from 1.5% of the population to nearly 10% of the population and will grow further.

But does the Government only target the older and older disabled you will ask?
No they don’t. Since they came in power they had the policy to select a caste system upon the society.
There for they stopped building new rented homes and reasonable priced homes.
They gave the money instead via the Housing Cooperation, read Government, to the Recognized social landlords. Not to build new houses but to increase the housing stock by diverting homes.
The result was a rocketing of the house price, making the homeowners in and out Government rich, by buying houses before the rise and then seeing the price shoot up.
Others who also had the money did the same, while foreign investors did the rest.
The population it self was now in a caste system. The very rich made richer by the rocketing house prices. The normal rich, also due to the house price increase.
The new homeowners with forced upon them incredible mortgages to up 5 x the yearly income and with, as the Banks knew, no hope in hell to pay it back.
The older home owners now suddenly saw their home going fast up in value. The Government was even faster by up valuation of their home so that extra Council tax could be charged.

Those older homeowners income did not go up so they at the end have to sell their homes and end up in RSL accommodation. Those are called Housing Estates and are in some cases nothing more then a concentrated encampment. In those Estates the landlord’s rule with iron fist and out dated human rights infringed measures. In some cases they simple, with the support of Governments approval, break the rules and the law.

And so we have now a caste system. In this system the bottom caste, the ones on pension credit in rented housing have no rights only obligations. They can be robbed, beaten freezing to death or starve, without that anyone react. This is so, unless it reached the newspapers. It is only thank to those newspapers that some of the bottom caste are exposed.

The caste above the bottom, the once in low paid jobs with long hours, they have some rights. Although being it very limited. If they are also on council rebates and benefits then they also are seen as the group who should not really exist.

We then enter the third cast or middle cast, the ones with a job who can just pay their council taxes, but struggle for food. Live in RSL or other rented housing and paying their rent out of their own pocket. Some even have a small mortgage. They are the ones who do the daily balancing act in order to survive. But, how long they work how hard they work; they also are never able to beat the ever-increasing taxes. They are the ones on food and utilities, the council tax, drive and parking taxes. Those taxes which never should have been installed, they only are in stalled for greed. It also helps the Government to control this group.

The second group of the top are the better earners, some MP’s fall in there as are most of the state paid workers, here is no struggle for food or utility payments, there may be some mortgage struggle as they are stung by banks with the high granted mortgages.

The first group is the crème de la crème, the top of the table, the hand holders with Government. Here is no pay problem and if there is they are able to get tax deductions.
Even so far that those rich sometimes do not pay at all tax; there were other groups struggle.

So here we have it, the society in all his caste system. From high to low, and from top to bottom. In which the top lingering in wealth and the bottom wait for the death.

One may ask is this not seen as to pessimistic, to sharp black on white, to far back in time.

We answer on this, no, it is not, and it is actual happening. NOW TODAY.

Does this mean the Government does not see this, or is it they do not want to see this?
Till the next election that is, then the lower castes will be given promises beyond any ones believe. Sad thing is many of the lower caste will believe the empty promises.

Let us now see a small example.

Two people walking down the road, a car crashes in to them, and both end up in a Hospital.
One person is 64 the other 65 years of age.
Both are recovering as such that they are able to leave the hospital after a half year. Both are for life bound on a wheelchair, and both need daily care.
So far it is straight forwards, and that is also were it ends.

The 64 years old will receive DLA, disability livings allowance, what will enable the person to get the needed care and full transport via the motability scheme. There will also be a direct debit care package supported by the in depended living foundation in combination up to 1000.00 a week. There for that person will have full help and transport. That person can go on with limitations living that person own life.

The 65 years old will receive an attendance allowance just enough for help of 4 hours a week, they are also entitled to a maximum of 300.00 a week but the attendance allowance
has to be handed in. No full transport possibilities available.
While the 64 years old can within the limitations move where ever that person wants to go. The 65 years old is doomed to sit at home. Trying to come around with the limited income, which will be absorbed by the extra help that person needs to stay alive.
That person still needs to make the choice between getting more help, or eat or heat.
If asked for further help than that person takes the risk to be slung into a nursing home.

The two examples highlight the Governments policy, still on working age then help is available. If not on working age, fight for your self or die.

And so here it is;

A person over 65 who get a disability cannot be declared disabled, as disability does not under Government rules exist after the age of 65.
There is no claim possible for DLA (disability living allowance) as people who get disabled after the age of 65 are not entitled to a living allowance, nor are they entitled to an independent living allowance.

In fact living independently is only for people of the higher income and the complete healthy, all others; sorry you are not entitled to any thing relating to a disability over 65.

They can apply, however, for an attendance allowance, this is a amount which gives aprox 3 to 4 hours help in the week if someone has to be paid.

It is also possible to apply by the older people service for a grant for weekly care cost, set at maximum 300 pounds but have to be paid back partly out of your income.
If there is a need for a higher amount the older people service will tell in most cases to go into a home, as that makes the older people a responsibility of the Home and free a living accommodation.

Again be aware that older people service are there to help, but in a very limited scope.

Older people are silently classed as a burden if they have to depend on state pension or extra help; there are no known organizations who actually stick out a finger to change this although they produce brilliant report and statistic to show how bad it is. But this is where it stops. In the last 4 year not one single question is launched in parliament to query the fact that 65 and over who gets a disability after that age. Nor why they are excluded from extra help, without the threat of going in a home. Not one question as why 65 years and over are not allowed to independently use their own transport, via Motability. And not one question is asked why they are excluded from the in depended living funds.
In fact the first one who summary raised the question was DN 11-2008.

We Have MP, s either translated as Member of Parliament or Multiple Payments who stand on the foreground shouting how they do their best for the older and the older disabled, special in election times, but actions NONE.

If you are over 65 and have the burden of getting disabled be aware no realistic help is there unless you can pay for it yourself. Forget holidays; forget days out, independently shopping or just window-shopping it is not allowed.

The small amount that you are able to receive and for which you have to pay partly yourself does not enable you to do all those things.

Remember, your home will be your prison, if you are unlucky enough to get disabled after the age of 65.

We know the above sounds harsh. We know that out there are services who actual will do everything possible within the Law to help you, but they are small and far between.

The people who could help, charities for the disabled, charities for older people and MP,s
Are all with good intentions, but need Government subsidies to stay aloof, except the MP, s who are richly paid, and is the only job in the UK for which no form of education is needed than being able to talk, and to persuade rightly or wrongly.
An exception is made for some of the real MP, s who do work hard and long for their voters.

It is one way to say thank you for working all your life, now rest in peace we will take the money.



14-08-2011
The headlines in the Media's showed the probability that certain Liberal members would join the Labour party as members. We think that headline is wrong. It is not a question which Liberal members will join the Labour party, but of the Liberal party as a whole will join Labour. Leaving Glegg and his mates symbolical are having a coalition with the Conservatives while in reality they are non-listed members of that party already. We, he said (Glegg) have a strong purpose in this coalition.


We heard a joke in Degerloch Germany when were on a meeting of like wise thinking people from all over Europe. One of the many jokes went like this, “We never know exactly what did happen with Adolf Hitler one said, the reply was, We know he just joined the Conservative party in the UK and is appointed as an adviser for solving the problem of the old and the disabled people”. As we said a joke, even bad tastes joke, although everyone was laughing loud, the English even loudest. However it gives you an idea how people out side England see the UK countries rulers. We in Italy have similar problems but we would not take it out on the old and the sick, it is against our nature.


One thing have Cameron, Glegg and dopey Osborne in common, they do not have a clue about normal people in this country. They cannot, for them it is a job for glory and income paid for by those common people in the Country who where so stupid to believe the Tory and Liberal lies. More terrifying is the stand of some Conservative MP's like the one of Corby who wants Face book and twitter by taken of the internet. Mainly in our opinion because Face book and Twitter can expose the many Conservatives life’s, it is an undemocratic act, an proposal fitting in a fascist country, or as the Germans would say "ein fascist mensche". The rest of the UK people simple have to rest in the expectation that the coalition will fall apart and that common sense will prevail again.


Let us be clear on what the International Financial monitors are saying. They said that Brown was on the right track. The latest IMF and World Bank reports both have grave doubts about the conservative’s measures. The fact that the UK is bordering at the bottom of the G countries support that view The lowering of the unemployment, the rise of export, the rising confidence of the last three months of Browns office support this. Although the Lib cons are now portraying this as their doing. Facts are against them. Those facts are hitting them hard now unemployment is rising fast and the youth unemployment stands on over 20% and that is high. If we taken out the youngsters who as a matter of routine are written of from receiving benefits and this is happening more and more frequent and for unknown reasons. Youngsters are putting in debts have nothing to eat and no place to sleep; future criminals are created and created by the conservatives.


Look at the riots in the UK, riots and always when the conservatives are in power, Criminals started it and a band of have nothing followed taking the change to have what they otherwise would not have. Wrong that is obvious but if all is taken away by a group of millionaires who are more travelling the world are on holidays, all things the have nothing cannot afford, then when an opportunity comes they take it. Those same millionaires then order an hard crackdown on the youngsters so that the theft of a bottle of water cost 3 years in jail then you have the beginning of a dictatorial state and the beginning of creation of a new layer of people who will not forget the conservatives, ever. Just as the people of Benghazi will not forget Gaddafi, ever.


The same International Financial monitors also say that the measures from Lib cons will not have the effect what is needed if they go on letting the groups above middle class alone. It is their where the most money is made at the moment. However while the Lib con artists are screwing the old the poor and the disabled and now having their eye on the middle class but leaving the once above that well alone. After all you cannot hit the very people who launched them in power (just) and which you need for you’re after dinner speeches when it all comes to an end.


Cameron's call for a Big Society was seen by the more simple supporters of the coalition as working together to get Britain great again. However that was never the case the Big Society, is nothing else then a free card for Big Business to rip off the people so that their profit will rise sharp and services for people will not longer in existence.



The main aim for the top of the class of the coalition is to get richer quick, as a reverse Robin Hood they steel it from the poor the old and the disabled to give it to the rich, the well off and the foreign immigrants with money. We have seen that more immigrants in the last year on study visas entered the country, however, will they ever leave there is no control system as ID cards they say are out of the question. Old people living on their own in Council or Social housing are slung out of the homes and into old people’s homes, losing their freedom and independence to give the free coming houses to the many immigrants, while the British people are put back to the back of the cue. Checking is not possible as without the ID cards there is no control possible we have seen that under labour.



There are fewer immigrants with work permits coming in the country in the last three months. This does not mean that there were less immigrants, the connection work permit-immigrant is removed. Those are the ones who are taken the British jobs; they are cheaper and are prepared to work overtime without payment. This means that anyone who manage to come in can, this as an example drive a minicab without having to be registration as an immigrant, any name an or address will do. There is no check possibility. Was the immigration bad under Labour the speed of new entrees over the last three month will put up the population by 2020 to 70 million.



Cameron gives exactly the example as he wishes that the rest of the rich would follow. The Cameron's or the CiC of this moment have naturally a different opinion if it comes to their own income. In fact they do what Tony Blair was doing when he started out, keep the building of new houses low so that the price of your own will rise fast. In this period of time it much more lucrative to rent out your home it can make you tens of thousands in a short period.



Many of the Cameron’s friends or supporters do the same. They rent their house out to immigrants and then an application is made to the Council for Housing Benefit. And as, for example in Cameron’s Kensington and Chelsea, the housing benefit does not have and limit any amount can be charged. The restriction that should be in place is still not used and rents of 8000 pounds a month are still charged. It is logic the conservatives will not block the conservatives supporters from obtaining 100.000 pound a year for a home that other wise would have stand empty and for which council tax would have been paid, while it is now paid via the benefits. Hence that it is that Kensington and Chelsea that has the majority, together with Westminster, of high rent properties for immigrants. Needless to say that both Councils are Conservative Councils.


It seems strange that it also is the Conservative Councils of Westminster and Kensington and Chelsea have a policy of claim cars where ever you can trivial or not clamp it. We do not say this; the Parking department of Kensington and Chelsea said that. Exact words “we can clamp where ever we want regardless how trivial it is”. We in a previous article already pointed out that Westminster had created the ultimate way to stop disabled people of parking on their own; they even went so far that they were ticketing disabled drivers cars when the disabled person in their wheelchair attempted to get a display ticket. When at last they managed and went back to their car they had already be given an parking ticket, with a smiling parking warden commenting” you should have been faster” in broken English.


In 1998 in an article we warned foreign visitors to England to be aware those Conservative councils targeting disabled drivers. In Kensington and Chelsea they created an even better way of targeting disabled cars. The wardens there are hiding behind other cars and as soon as a disabled care parks, they wait till the driver is gone to give them and ticket. They even they have taken an photo, that on the photo the car suddenly had a different colour was also not a problem for Kensington and Chelsea, must have been the sun when the photo was taken that discoloured it, we never have found out what that it was the photo or the car.


If you think that that was bad, then read the following. An driver was unloading an disabled person near the surgery the disabled person had to go, he wheeled her into the surgery and went straight back to the car which was parked on a single yellow line. The traffic warden had already placed a ticked on the car, the penalty notice showed because of parking between 1128 and 1129 on a yellow line. Never mind that he had an Kensington and Chelsea disabled badge never mind that the regulations for the disabled said that they can load and unload quickly, no the person was disabled and had to be put through extra stress. After all you never know stress can kill and then there was one less. And we can go on and on, read the foreign papers and see what disabled visitors say about England. We ourselves have seen things that you may expect to see in a third world country, but we have seen it in England and worst then a third world country.

Places without gas, without electricity without drinking water, without roads, mud paths as roads as previously only was seen in the Middle ages in Europe but something that still exist in England. Strange enough all those points are always in Conservative controlled areas. This are then the rulers who tell the world that they are top of the world and that they want the rest of the world be like England. We can assure the Governing Conservatives they do not want to be like England, they are already far beyond that. They have already electricity, drinking water and proper roads If England want to do something then do it for their own people.


Not with fantasy stories of a new flood and rising water, they did not believe the first flood why should they believe the second one. Not with new schemes to get more money out of the people with as target the poor and the older people first, under the motto come on get rid of them.


If you count all the parking problems with disabled cars with badges in the Conservatives boroughs then you cannot get rid of the feeling that they have the same principle for the disabled as Hitler has. We know the Conservatives are not that far, yet...... Give them time and they will have solved the problem of the disabled once and for all. We have off course the assurance that it will all be sorted out.......... in the future.


Is it also not weird that it is again Cameron who said that rents should have a maximum............ in the future? Private clampers should be outlawed.......... in the future. This means that in the time between the Conservative Councils, the Conservative hangers on can go on charging what they want, when they want it, and to whom they want it. It is called cashing in with the Conservatives. It does not stop the Councils contractors to ticket every car that is parked legal or illegal if the are in Conservative Boroughs.


It is always in the Conservatives boroughs and councils, regardless of this is a County Council or a District Council they will get you money anyway with nothing in return. Not longer does Democracy the will of the people, it means now the people have to do the will of the councils and Government. They can make up any rule any law, what they do frequently, and you will have no right to complain or to object. These are people who say they will cut down but in reality are cutting others down to pocket the different s. Honest? Who talks about honesty, we talking here about the Conservatives, honestly?

16-08-2011
It maybe recalled that many of times Governments intended to spent money on the research of alternative fuel. However, speculation in the casino like stock markets is more important then the search for alternative fuel. Special now they have spiked the tax on fuel to such a height that it is a milk cow for them.



They have supported hybrid and electric fuelled cars. However, it does not stop the pollution. The unstable foreign politic of the last couple of years will force the hand of the gamblers and will see the prices of oil rise and rise again, even double the amount the barrel is now.



The market tendency, the weapon race, not only to produce but also distributes weapons to every country which is willing to support the US. The overloading of weapons to Israel so that they can defend themselves against every state that is not in favour of them.
The original they who are not in favour of me are against me is a principle very much in supply there. The US and their dependencies are there to protect them, and in exchange the State of Israel supplies them with information. That this information is mostly wrong and none existing does not the matter. The reaction is made the action taken and cannot be undone.



The mad dog acting as the Georgian president, loaded to the top with weapons and money with Israeli and US merceries worldwide trainers. The constant actions against the Russian state and the enclaves of Osetia and Abhazia, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are all there to make it a sure bet that the oil price will rise. Main dealers are convinced that there will be an over reach of oil soon. It will all help to give the gamblers on the Casino style stock markets the ammunition they need to place their bets.



However, is there an alternative to oil? This is the big question and many have already ventured out in this field. Some attempting to use lithium batteries to power cars. Others have dual fuel systems based on a system in use for more then 25 years. This kind of cars starts on gasoline or gas and then switch over to gas as the cleaner part with the gasoline as stand by. It is all a start, but it keeps the price of those cars well above the price of a combusted engine.



Worldwide Governments are aiming to reduce emissions, fast. However, on this moment in time they only take on board the fuel emissions on a like for like base. This means they can force car producers to clean up their act. Future will show of this also cleans up the cars. They can invest in an alternative power such as the mentioned the electric car.



However, if they take in hand the wider costs then they will see that this does not reduce the further pollution of the environment. As an example, the batteries in those cars are highly flammable, which pollute. While being driven the car produces less pollution then the combustion fired engine. The batteries need electricity to enable the car to run. This means they have to plug in into a power socket in a normal electricity circuit.
This will use electricity produced by power station either run on gas coal or nuclear power plants. It will be obvious therefore that it does not stop the pollution it is just transferred to another object.



In short, what ever we use as known at this moment pollutes regardless what and at what stage. The one more the other less.

The hope on this moment is that an electric car can be produced which is able to do long distant travel. This would need however an alteration in fuelling stations to cater for the electric car. Till this moment, although there are small exceptions, loading of the batteries need to be done at home.

An important fact not addressed by the Governments in their quests for reduction of emissions is the simple fact of electricity.



If a main switch in the future near or far to establish the electric car for all, even if this is only in the cities, than new power plants need to be build. Not one of two but many of them. Those new power plants regardless of they are fuelled on oil, gas, coal or nuclear power will pollute. What ever they decide to use as fuel the power plants still need to be build.
We agree that in the beginning the nuclear power plants will be cleaner, but only in the beginning. After a while they will produce waste what need to be disposed off which can only be done partly and will create pollution by the plants disposing of the waste.
Next to that and this has been proven around the world is the danger of a nuclear plant for human health. Every nuclear plant in the world which is built near civilian housing has seen a rapid increase in leukaemia.



Countries using nuclear fuel have already serious waste problem. On this moment certain countries are receiving other countries nuclear waste for profit. The human cost is not a point in those business operations. However in time it could influence the public opinion, this in turn can stop the smooth establishment of new nuclear power plants. If such a scenario will exist then electricity will be produced via oil, gas or coal. In such cases the benefit of the electric car would be of no consequence as the pollution will be exactly the same if not worse. However, whatever power plant they establish on whatever fuel we already know, it will pollute either directly or via a delayed action. Either gas or coal or oil or nuclear fuel, it all pollutes regardless.



So what would the solution, man can ask them selves. This is a question what the UN and the Governments should ask them selves. Maybe less concentration on severe pollution via warfare they should put their attention on to the matter of what fuel next.
The should put the billions they now spent on killing people for the flimsiest of excuses and self made attacks to get them selves a reason for more attacks.



World domination and bribery to get friends and countries on your side and to kill millions, just to feel good, looks good in their own eyes. But, finding a new source of fuel without a pollutant would be made them hero’s in anyone eyes.



One thing stands as a pole above water; the so advertised electric car is not the solution.
They may not pollute so much as the dual fuel or combustion engines at source. However, they do pollute just as much by the creation of new needed power plants if the electric car will be used a mass. They also need at least every 5 years new batteries, while it is unknown yet what will be done with the waste batteries.
Therefore, if the electric car will be used a mass, so will the battery production and the production of waste mountain and the pollution.



Only if we are able that we, either directly or indirectly, do not need fossil fuel we can reduce pollution.
We can try what ever we want, but so long it entails to use of fossil fuel, we are onto the wrong track.
We could start with severely reducing the pollution by stopping and stop inventing wars and the reason for it. Those wars for oil and control are the worst polluters of the environment and human actions.

18-08-2011
We see the news we read the papers, we hear the stories from family friends and neighbours, crime is all around us in his many forms. It is visible for all but invisible for the ones who have to protect us from those crimes. Gangs are organizing our lives regardless of this are street gangs or gangs organized in business. These ones infiltrate our lives our homes and our actions in daily life.



To make it possible for gangs to do that the authority have down graded crimes and violators of rules.
It is simple if you are rich you can break almost every law of the land. They will be congratulated for it while if you are poor, even an accidental mistake is regarded as the biggest crime in history. This can be indeed a parking ticked which land you in jail for a considerable time, while an attempt on a live is seen as a hazard of life.



If such a poor person has an attempt on his life and want to defend himself, it will be him who goes to jail while again his attacker is congratulated. That this is not something of this time will be shown in two examples 100 years apart, one in the US the other in the UK. However let us first explain what crime is exactly; Crime is a breach of a rule or a law issued by the Governing Authority who may or may not prescribe punishment. It will be obvious that crime is indeed not always a reason to punish. Therefore, the answer has to be a resounding NO it is not always punishable.



Punishment depends on who commit the breach of the rule or the law. Rich or poor influence or no influence. Someone who takes a single coin can be arrested and punished for this sometimes very severe.
However, another can take millions are congratulated and sometimes even rewarded for doing so.



It is this as reason that many people think that there is one rule for one and one rule for another, but is this the case? The answer however is NO, the law is for all the same, but a breach of the rule or the law of a person without power or connections is seen as a crime, while the same breach of rule and law by a well-connected person with power is seen as a business decision.



Further on we will explain how this exactly works, as it will also explain what we call crime and the working of it, why it is used so width spread. It will explain why crime is committed and why it is so attractive. It is there for important that we next explain a culture that is called a gang. The dictionary explains clearly the out lay of it. A gang is a group of people who through organization, formation, and establishment of an assemblage share a common goal and identity. The word carries a negative connotation. There are many examples to put forwards. However, we will restrict ourselves to two businesses in which the breach of rule and law is used to get advances in business. This in disregards of the human costs, and on how to cover it up, or to present it as a fact.



The first example was in the US around 100 years ago plus/minus a couple of years. It was presented as an antique and furniture business. This was written on the business cards.
Born in New York, he worked himself up to an almost celebrity status due to money and power. Although he stated that he was a furniture dealer, he had his hands in many other businesses, from furniture to transport and nightclubs.
He was indeed a celebrity he was one of the first who shake hands with Charles Lindberg after his famous transatlantic flight in 1927. He was more seen as an upstanding community leader and on the forefront to help people. He was the man who supplied milk to school children an action what was continued for a long time after his death. He opened soup kitchens for the homeless and the poor. He would buy huge blocks of opera tickets and distributed them among the low-income neighbourhoods. He was also instrumental of talents like Louis Armstrong and others.
His famous club was a night hot spot for new acts such as Bing Crosby and others.
He was in deep regard and admired by the low income, the homeless, and the poor in the city. In short, he was the leader of a wealthy business who did so much good to the people that he received many cheer while walking the street and it was really deserved.



The business of the second example was in the UK, and just as the first example was around 1900. The business was described as a charitable trust to provide homes to the poor. The fist of which were ready in 1909 and by 1925 there were nearly 2000 homes. The real expansion started after a change in the Housing act 1974 under which money as a grant could be given to charitable housing. For many who could not afford to buy a house, the providing of charitable housing was indeed an act of charity. However, if things are going well then there are always others who lay in wait to take over.



The original status for housing for the poor as a charity was only a distant memory and only used to fill homes. Homes however were the main purpose of the new business to grow, to get more homes, more value, and more money. They accepted that they still had to put up with the poor, the old and the disabled, but this could be changed by the change of staff, the caring old one out and the more ruthless new one in.
The condition was simple a contempt for the poor, the old and the disabled was enough to qualify for a position. The next thing was to raise the rents shy high only the capping measures stopped them from raising the rent above any reasonable level, still they managed to be one of the highest in the field of this kind or organizations.



The two examples have several point in common, not only they started at the same point in time. Both also pretended to be good to the poor and the old, the homeless and the less well off.
Both also had a second agenda the making of so much money as possible regardless of the consequences, they were in the business of making money, money and more money, regardless how.
Both had and have to the outside the image of a charity caring for the depending side of the community,
In addition, both did and do it at such a way that even insiders do believe it but as the first example will show it will not last.
Both used and use the force of intimidation harassment and the threat to health or life to obtain what they wanted and want.



Both also have a whole army of legal experts to cover their tracks, and both can be described as ruthless in their pursued of money and power.

Both had their minions to do the work for them, this enable those to keep themselves clean of any blame.
If something went wrong, they could easily blame the minions as they are easily to be disposed off.

The two examples show that breaking the rules and law can be lucrative and rewarding.
If that happens, accidental or otherwise then the tables could be turned. Example one found out the hard way
That it can turn even if they cannot proof that the rule and the law were broken, that he still went to jail was due to a supposedly failing to supply the right accounts, incomplete account and failing to supply accounts. His name was Al Capone and he no doubt done many of the never proved crimes. The other was a so-called social housing operator accused of many breaches of law.



Both examples way of working was the same, the breaches of the rule and the law, the intimidation the harassment the bullying. Both had the protection of politicians, the Government and their quango,s. They both failed as such but in both cases it did show that breaking the law does can make you wealthy, rich without having to fear the Authorities as so long they get paid.


20-08-2011
With the US election looming again, with many candidates falling over each other to praise the bankers, the Jews, the British, but also failing to address the recession, the one after another wipe out of financial institutions, the downfall of the sitting president seems to be at its final point is not of their concern. That S&P lowered their financial status will of no concern for the USA economic state of affairs. It will be heads of S&P that will regret to have made that decision and number one is already gone!



However this seems to be true but it needs only one more act of irresponsible behaviour to make the whole thing fall down to unknown levels. It may be doubtful of actions then taken will be enough to save the status of the on this moment still large economy in the world. The US as the largest of states which have brought intimidation and bribery to an almost Art form, uses this form for starting wars on futilities. The main excuse being that it is a fight against terrorism. This after having made and set the base for the creation of terrorism. The started wars however are all in the search or control of oil. For this reason the wars would be globally accepted if they were started for a serious reason, but they were not.



The war in Afghanistan was started with as reason to remove a Government they did not like, but that only after that Government was not able to build an OIL pipeline needed to the Arab Sea.

The excuse was that the markets were overloaded with heroin from Afghanistan and that if the US would have ousted the Government and had installed their own Afghanistan Government that would be over. Many years down the line, the war is not over, the US simple lost and needed the NATO to help them to find a steady footing again, but heroin is now so readily available that even the price even is gone down. And pipeline yet is to be finished. All the lives all the money down the drain and one of the pillars for recession created.



The war in Iraq was started with as reason that the country had weapons of mass destruction WMD. Again it was a lie provided by the mossad of Israel, the maker of many fantasy stories if it suits their plans. The real reason was OIL, and once again the US lost and again they had to be saved by other countries not under NATO, but under intimidation and bribery, that war is also still going on. The USA is in the same situation as Britain; they started WW1 and lost then needed the commonwealth countries to save them. They started WW2 and lost and needed the commonwealth and the USA to help them to survive. The USA is now in a similar situation they start a war loose and need the NATO to save them. If we look back over the history, then the US won only one real war, the one with Japan and for that they had to use an Atomic bomb, killing many, but for the US war is war regardless.



They lost the Vietnam War and the Korean War and were thrown out of Somalia. Started in Iraq and needed Britain to help them, started in Afghanistan and needed Britain to help them but even then they could not win so NATO was drafted in and still they cannot win. It did not stop the USA and Britain to start yet another war, this time against Libya a small 6 million country that they even with the might of the NATO after 6 months could not win. They want to go into Syria as there is also oil and then after the Iranians.



However starting on Iran will be more difficult as this is not like Afghanistan/Libya and Iraq, a small country.
The reason why, the mossad of Israel said the Iran had the aim for nuclear weapons. Again like in the Iraq case there was no proof, but as the Jewish bankers fund most of the US economy is was taken on board. The fact that there is no proof, that inspectors did not find any proof, which the country said it is for nuclear energy, does not count. What will happen now that Israel is in trouble then selves need to be seen? Initially they will attack the weakest, Gaza, but what after that?



Still they pretend to be the world security power that they as such have dumped themselves and the rest of the world into a deep dark hole of recession, does not count as Oil comes first.
However there is a psychiatric expression for situations in which one thinks they are a Super Hero, while in reality they are a failure as they have proven to be. If ever a Country is left down by a Government than it is the US.

This US, which is one of the largest polluters in the world, then lectured other just not to do that.
This US which calls themselves a Christian Country, kills were it can kill against the Law of God, thou shall not kill.

And why this all may one ask? Greed nothing else than greed, oil and money, money and oil.
And what have they after perusing this, they have Wars, and recessing and a lack of money.

However it is not only oil and money they want, they also wants complete power, and it is sad but many leaders of countries are more interesting in themselves to get rich than to work for their country.



The US should take a leaf out of the British isles book, was the former leader of the Government, Blair, just in it for the money and he made plenty out of it, the present leader Cameron want to get even more out of it instead of taking the country first, even if he let down the old, the poor and the disabled and impoverished a whole nation.

International laws they say, the US, most be followed at all times, and the rules of the UN should be adhered too. But at the moment they are telling us that they breaking all the laws themselves as they see them above any law. Laws are for others to obey but not for the USA and his obedience countries.



That same US ignores the UN advice states such as Israel to do the same, although Israel is a state who ignores all international laws with the exception if they can make use of it, they also ignore the UN again with the exception that they will adhere if it is their favour, the US does exactly the same. See for example the war in Iraq and Kosovo. However if for example Russian does the same with South Ossetia and Abkhazia which were both attacked by an US friendly country with US trained soldiers and US weapons, as a thief in the night, under cover of the opening of the Olympic games. Than the US screams murder. If they then recognize those countries just as the US did with Kosovo, then again they scream murder.



They scream also if Iran does not obey their wishes concerning the nuclear installations, but keep still if Israel refuses access to their arsenal. Even the presidential candidate Mc Cain who screams and wants more nuclear power, denies other countries to have the same rights unless they belong to the US wolf pack.

What disturbed brain then has decided to risk all against the rest of the world against the wishes of the world, the President!

What disturbed soul decided to put against the wishes of the world majority, in a deepening economical crisis and put new sanctions against Iran. Iran a country that had a fairer presidential election then the US, with a surprise winner who had also some sup rice remarks only beneficial to the Iran students, put pulled out of contest and launched into the world as a tirade against Israel. Who cried wolf straight away, forgetting that it was not Iran who had in the past attacked Israel, but Israel who attacked Iran and is still threatening to attack Iran again for a fantasy reason.



Again it will be obvious that the US acted against the UN and the rest of the world but with the support of France and Germany..

Does this disturbed soul who invented this latest round of non-working sanctions against Iran, China, Russia, and Venezuela, really think that any of those countries will take it serious. However, saying this, there will be no doubt those countries will not forget it. The question will arise is it wise rapidly growing countries economical as well in arms constant to
Upset restricting, although only on paper, to do what the US does for years. Is it wise to upset countries that can collective field an army the size of the whole US population with the hardware to go with it, although the US sees them as developing countries?



This disturbed soul should realize the one who throws the ball can it be expected to be thrown back in time. Most importantly, do the sanctions change anything, and the answer on this has to be a clear NO. The only alternative left for the US is to start yet another war, which they can only do with the help of members of their wolf pack. It would give Russia and China to use this to bring definitely or again back countries under their influence. More countries will take the change to settle scores and thanks again the world will be inflame due to the US. The world economical situation will collapse. The US will not be able to sell their products anymore, as inland there is not enough money to buy, and as they have upset or bankrupted allied countries and are restricted to sell to the worlds larger economies as they are not longer interested in the US. In fact it will be the end of the US.



Science fiction, seeing it to dark, could there be another scenario, maybe. Every coin has two sides it just depends how it flips. The US could try to form a committee of influence with China and Russia, to inspect the installations in Iran but also the arsenal in Israel. This in exchange for a normal treatment by the US of Iran. This without the efforts of the US to influence the media in spreading false rumours.



The economical situation would be restored as a global economy; there would be no threats again other countries as the only one who made constant suggestions of threat and threats is the US supported by his wolf pack, special Germany as they have a large history of starting wars and mass killings. But we think this all will be too much and to simple for our simple soul in the US.

22-08-2011
Someone did ask me as a Buddhist what do you actual believe if anything. The question did take me by surprise and it did take me some time to formulate the right reply. However, than I was told that I had waited to long with my reply and that on the bases of probability I did not believe.
The logic of this passed by me, I always had believed that the main point of me being a Buddhist was to believe in peace of mind, of mankind and peace in the world. To be connected to others of they are aware of that or not. I was always aware that I could change the mood of others quit easy, that certain small movements, doings and words could change the atmosphere in seconds. I have always used this to keep peace and harmony around me so that undesirable moments which enter everyone live from time to time could be in me kept to the absolute minimum. Most of all are always having attempted to keep negative thoughts out of my mind. This I did because I had noticed how dramatic it could affect others. That was always the same with animals, were others had problems I always managed to get the animals quit.



Buddhists believe in principle that all living beings are totally interconnected and interrelated, whether they are consciously aware of it or not. In studies counting over 30 years more then 40000 hours I have learned to use a simple analogy for the interconnection. Each being has their own transmitting and receiving station and is constantly send over to all others in their state of mind and is constantly receiving broadcasts from all others. Even the most insignificant thoughts in our minds can have some effect on all others. I always have been compassionate to the problems of others and have attempted always to create a sphere in which the problem could be solved without frustration and anger. I did manage to give a positive detailed answer to the person who had questioned my believe. The explanation was as is written underneath.



Our emotions are the first post we have to pass on our way to understand the principles of Buddhism. How much the more so do our strong negative emotions which could result in direct or indirect forms of physical violence! To say it different, each thought in the mind of each and every one of us brings the world either a little further or closer to the brink of disasters. If each time we feel irritated, annoyed, thwarted, outraged, or just plain frustrated, we reflect on the consequences of our thoughts, our wanting and actions perhaps that reflection in itself will help us to act in a way that shows responsibility for the world around us.



One thing has however nothing to do with Buddhism, the launches of clever sayings and examples, clever it may be but Buddhism it is not. Strange enough we have the leader of the so-called leader of the SGI, a semi political organisation with dubious directions, which are using Buddhism to attract members via brain washing. But Buddhism it is not it is a way to attract members just as Hitler’s, Hitler Jugend attracted members. The members of the SGI are brainwashed indeed, they actual believe that simple shouting to the Gohozon makes their wishes coming fulfilled. They stick together like clue and it is the clue that gives the feeling that things are better. By many the shock of the contrary has led to suicide and destruction of lives values.



Kids abandoned their parents; they were used to weed out all the family they could not persuade to join the cult, they actual kill people the main concept of Buddha to preserve life is violated for the cult. If a believer in Buddha gets angry at our family or friends, we will be aware that we are that our anger is taking us over and maybe just maybe we will think twice and wonder whether is worth the consequences. Only if we concentrate on putting our own minds at ease we are able to transfer our own “on ease” mentally to others and that we will transfer the “on ease” condition into our actions. That is however not so by the SGI members, they love hate, they love to supply hate to others if they do not want to join the cult, they hate others if they are richer, more educated or have a better life. It is not Buddhism that thrives the SGI but hatred against all things they do not have, others have but which they want to have. Look at the leader he wants the peace price for what? He has done nothing for peace; he has destroyed families, set family against family friends against friends, and that all to gain money and admiration. He is proud that he can sit at the UN as a listener, then again there are more war criminals sitting in the UN then anywhere else.



Then we have the real Buddhist, the once who believe in the teachings of Buddha, who will indeed not harm a living thing as it will reflect on their own in a later life. As to the actions we are willing to undertake, the life form we may be about to harm or to kill, I know that from my own Buddhist point of view, if I would harm or kill it then it may well be our dearest from a former live our own parents, children, wives or husbands or friends. It is for that reason that I see as a Buddhists the problem of anger, violence and war as a karmic one, the only solution I can see is study the learning of Buddha and teach and practice’s the correct ethical behaviour. Good behaviour and good deeds lead to good consequences, the bad ones lead to bad consequences.



The basics of Buddhism is the respect for life, there it concludes that no live should be taken or any action taken what could lead to lives being taken. Unlike almost all other religions, the Buddhist learning teaches that there are no exceptions to this rule. The taking of life not only covers human life but all live forms. The taking of intoxicating substances falls is also prohibited in the Buddhist learning. In the world of the Buddhist all life is sacred, in which selfishness, does not interfere with the basic interconnectedness of all live forms. That interconnectedness, when freed from the distortion of selfishness, is based upon the potential for enlightenment that every live form shares. It does sound fantastic you may say, but it never will be possible to create peace in our world in our time, ever.



It is not for all possible to understand the logical relationships for peace of mind and with this peace in the world. Back ground education and up bring will have negative influences on the way the person feels and thinks. I shall try to spell them out more clearly what I do mean with this. A person who is brought up in nature will not always see the use of not killing animals, other religions do not always have the Karma attached to their religion and therefore they do not see the risk that by killing that animal they could in fact killing an old friend from the past. The person brought up in the believe that war is the ultimate price for being a hero cannot see anything wrong in killing another person or persons. That he in fact is killing maybe friends and family from another life will not cross his mind.



They have to understand that life human or not human is actual the same, according to Buddhist learning's. Just as by humans when they are nearing death regardless of it is killed or dies by accident or by disease, an animal too responds to its death with the same thoughts of resentment, hatred and revenge. One of the problems today is that karma we generate is often not immediately obvious to us.



We are responsible of we like or not for every death animal who's meat we eaten, regardless of it is killed by others or by ourselves. We are responsible for the poisoning of the environment and people by the chemicals we buy, use and pour down our drains. We are also responsible for conflicts, without being aware of this by the way select our representatives. Even if we do not wrong ourselves but attribute to the wrong it means that we have to bear up to the responsibility of our deeds. We cannot hide ourselves behind the “I did not know” as ignorance does not mean that we are not guilty; it does not absolve us of any blame.



War can be started at any time, when the time is found to be right. War comes when leaders have the need for more power, more greed, more land. It can either be civil war when brother fights against brother, father against son, family against family. Or it can be country against country for the gain, for any gain. However people will be killed and killed again, maybe brother by brother, father by son, family by family of a past life. The learning's of the early age learns that violence can solve many problems, which are right to use violence to deal with a problem, it is in fact wrong.



However, by acting on your own thoughts, your own way of thinking we can become part of the movement what will and can in time to come eliminate the learning's of violence as reason for solving a problem. The learning's about karma tells us that regardless what we do if we do it have to be in complete selfless compassion for all what lives. The main problem is that in all what we do for the right way of doing it, if we do not loose our frustrations and lingering anger, we will not regardless how hard we try reach our goal of selfless compassion. We simple use patience and wisdom to avoid the anger and frustrations.



The ideal of Buddhism is to return life after life, to our world to teach them the way we had to learn ourselves, that peace in the world will destroy the sufferings due to wars and conflicts. We have to teach them the permanent way to real peace for them the world and ourselves. We have to teach them the learning's of Buddha.



24-08-2011
In memoriam Libya!

Between 18 and 22 of August 2011 the colonial troops of Britain and France have landed thousands of troops on the ground in Libya to start the end game, were the rabble rebels could not get any further. Most of the troops were dressed in Rebel clothing, but the French legionnaires and some of the British troops were actual dressed in their own uniforms, on Green square where on 23 of August a small band of youngsters with some older mentors were gathered in one of the corners it could be seen that this was organised by the British troops who controlled it, although they kept their heads of the camera's to avoid recognition as such. That was what SKY and FOX called the celebrations on Green square, maximum 50 people and well controlled, one reported asked an 28 year old man of he was happy, his answer was "I have waited 42 years to see this moment" and that at the age of 28, meaning that 14 years before he was born he already was waiting for Gaddafi to fall. That reporters telling people to read out the lines the reporters have given them is one thing, but at least they could make it a less obvious fake!


This brings me to a news article we received today, the message that the British first minister had sitting in an emergency council for Libya. This did happen a couple of days ago, but we getting here the news always a couple of days later. Sometimes it means that what did happen is already old news before it reached us here in the Ukraine. We getting the news from non-Western Countries within minutes, but for some reason the Western news always takes longer.
It is on it self surprising that a British First minister claims to be in charge of an emergency meeting for the unity of Libya. Libya is not part of Britain! However it is a part of the colonization by the EU of North Africa where it concerns oil!



We are aware that the war by EU and the supporting rebels from Benghazi comes to an end. It is for that reason that the henchman of Britain the Jeckeln of British politic and the proud instigator of the many killings in Libya supports the one million dollar reward death or alive of Gaddafi. After all if you cannot win it, simple kill it. It is the same politics that his government has in mind for the British population their money or their death! It is a logical conclusion of the might’s of the near 800 million peoples NATO countries against the 6 million of that of Libya. 800 to 6 is always a fight that the smaller one will loose. However the NATO made sure that the smaller Libya could not win by taking away the war possibilities of Libya, and started then to attacks on all that was moving. It is estimated that more then 20.000 people died, not rebels not Libyan soldiers but people killed in the fires between the NATO indiscriminate attacks and the lingering rebels from Benghazi. And still they could not win, 800 to 6 and they could not win. So they did what cowards always do if they cannot win they go over to sneaky operations. The British equivalent of Adolf Hitler in his beginning years, even using similar word such as "the big society" "helping the poor" "getting the country back to growth" all words said by Hitler and duly repeated by the first minister of Britain. It is therefore not a surprise that he also did exactly the same things as Hitler did starting small aggressions in other countries and then with full force take over that country.



Here we see the clear picture; the British secret services arranged the rebels in Benghazi with large amounts of money stolen from the British people who have to suffer high taxes, high food prices and lack of work as a result. On the 18th of August British troops as a covert operation were brought into Libya, camouflaged as rebel fighters, on 20th of August Helicopters landed large troops sections on the ground while warship landed large contingents of French legionaries 20 miles west of Tripoli. Those forces of over 4000 soldiers again camouflaged as rebels but with Yorkshire accents were the ones who led the rally on Tripoli. It did mean that the EU and the NATO had troops on the ground in Libya and as such proclaimed a war on Libya.



Now the fight is in Tripoli the rats coming out of the dark, "the sons of Gaddafi are arrested" No they were not as one of them said, they did murder my younger brother but as you can see I am still here. The rats of the ICC stated that war crimes and crimes against humanity would be brought against Gaddafi and his sons. Not against Israel who just murdered many Palestinians and Egyptians. Not against Britain for creating the largest poor population part in the EU, jailing people for stealing a bottle of water for many years, all crimes against humanity, not against Israel and Britain because they are protected by the USA of which the ICC is a kangaroo court, they are honest judges, they only tell fantasy stories when their lips are moving.



The Palestinian doctor Ashraf al Hagoug, wants prosecution against Muammar Gaddafi at once he is imprisoned in the Netherlands for his prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Not that this ever will happen but still. Not against Israel who just killed many of his country folk, not against Britain or the USA who active helping the state of Israel to kill the Palestinians, Israel who kept Palestinians in prison for live torture them for throwing a stone to an Israeli soldier. No against Gaddafi, he suddenly blames Gaddafi in person for his imprisonment. The crime that El Hagoug and five Bulgarian nurses in Libya were accused off was because the Libyan authorities said that El Hagoug and the nurses were suspect of 450 infected children in Libya that they had deliberately infected with HIV, the virus that can cause AIDS. They were in the African country initially sentenced to death, but that was later commuted to life imprisonment. After a diplomatic offensive among other things, the EU and France were involved; they were released in July 2007. That they want to take Gaddafi to court is to reward them for the infection of those 450 children. A crime was committed and punishment done, but because it was done in Gaddafi Libya, crime are no crimes but heroic actions by people who committed the crime.



We all know that is was the French and the British in their search to obey the USA who started the rebellion. To get the Western public on their site they in a covert operation killed many of the Benghazi population which was then in the Western Media blown up to the killings by Gaddafi who was probably just as surprised by this event as the rest of the NON-Western world was i.e. 2/3 of the world population. Many have said already that the West would not do such a thing, in that case remember the attempted genocide of South Ossetia, organised by the Western powers to get a direct link to Russia. A friend of ours also Ukrainian is in Tripoli he said that at the moment that the Western Media was sending out dancing and jubilating people on the Green Square, now called by Google the square of Martyrs, he did not see any dancing and celebrating people, in fact he said it was rather quit beside the bomb attacks by British planes. This corresponds with reports from early this morning, received from persons inside the capital that all was normal and that the TV images of Green Square were fake!



Our friends also report while staying in the Marriott, that it were British passport holders who did set the fire in the night of 21/22 august and then blamed it on the fighting, while indiscriminate firing on people who wanted to leave the Marriott, blaming it on Gaddafi, just as the British had done In Benghazi at the start of the rebellion. Where they part of the British covert operation to kill so many civilians as possible to have an Media excuse as that Gaddafi was still killing civilians, were they part of the groups of NATO mercenaries and special forces landed from the sea on August 22. This in a clear breach of UNSC Resolution 1970 and 1973 (2011) and as such is a war crime that must be investigated by international lawyers, also by the UN itself, If they doing this then they should have a good look at the terrorist actions of states such as Britain and France and the terrorist action by NATO. Let them ask themselves why is NATO bombing Tripoli indiscriminately today if the terrorists, sorry, "rebels" already control it?



Look at the SKY and FOX News images, could a bunch of punks enter Tripoli so easily? Did SKY/FOX not realise that one person with military experience stationed beside the road could have taken out practically all of the terrorists the channel was accompanying? Of course they realise this, the point is that they did not enter Tripoli; it was a fake set-up with for people who were well known on the ground of the situation could have seen that it was not Tripoli. However SKY/FOX NEWS see the people as fools and know that what they say or present is seen as correct. These are the same people who believe that "Friends and Coronation Street" are real. In fact all what is shown is believed by this kind of people as real, even Donald Duck.



An other questing may be asked as why were some of the Salloum and Ran Ouh tribes taken hostage and told off of coming to the rescue of Libya. They had already taken the up arms and wanted to support Colonel Gaddafi against the NATO/EU/US assault on sovereign Libya. Charity staff are being threatened and beaten if they did not wanted to support the NATO in their attacks on an in depended country for the sake of oil. Independent journalists are being attacked and threatened. Dr. Lamb was shot; Lizzie Phelan has been warned not to mention that the "rebels" have "Al Qaeda" elements in their ranks. Citizen from non EU or non USA are harassed by rebels with a clear British or French accent. Two charity workers for development projects were found back shot and with throat slit after they complained about the rebels harassment. Chad workers for the charity were simple shot at close range by the so-called rebel’s one with an obvious Virginia accent which was recognized by one of the USA Charity staff. He was left alone after they found out he was an American, but fled over the Algerian border and is still in hiding on another project far from the North of Africa.



It is obvious that the EU/US/NATO are desperate to find another country to colonize and therefore have now set in ground troops, after all it were the US/UK/France who started this business with Libya with the full support of Germany. With Qatar, itself a dictatorial country, financing the project.
The new project lined up months ago, Syria, is still full on the agenda. China and Russia this time do not want to play ball yet but there can be no doubt that further pressure will put on both countries to support the NATO terrorists. The USA/UK/France with the support of Germany, the same countries who started the conflict in Libya, is significantly increasing pressure on Syria. On August 18, top diplomatic representatives of Great Britain, France, Germany and the U.S. stated that it was "necessary to increase pressure on the Syrian government" that refuses to heed the demands of the international community. Obey the West and hands over the Golan Heights permanent to Israel and the oil to the USA.



That the western media build up lie after lie is clearly to see for anyone who actual takes the trouble to check the Media stories. Forces loyal to the Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi struck back Monday against the rebel fighters who had swept euphorically, with the lead and assistance of the Western forces, into the capital the night before, forcing them to retreat from several strategic locations and tempering hopes that the battle for Tripoli was all but over. It did show clearly the lie that Gaddafi was gone. The dramatic appearance Monday night of Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam at the Rixos hotel, where the Tripoli-based press corps remains trapped, contradicted the rebels’ assertion the day before that they had said they had captured him. The BBC and CNN quoted him as telling reporters that government forces had lured the rebels into a trap and “broken the back” of the opposition army and that pro-Gaddafi forces are back in control of parts of the city.



President Obama and other world leaders declared an end to Gaddafi’s nearly 42-year-long rule and hailed the courage of the Libyan people. The leaders said they were looking forward to cooperating with a new Libyan government, which presumably would be led by the opposition’s Transitional National Council, based in the eastern city of Benghazi, and mainly consist out of USA trained Libyans some of which have never seen Libya before. Obama was just like his governor of Britain the first minister Cameron ready to tell the people “The Libya that you deserve is within your reach.” It may be very doubt full that there any infra structure left for the Libyans and that the only parts that are still working are the oil sites, which were excluded from the NATO attacks. The question can be asked, do the Libyans really deserve a nearly complete destroyed country just for the sake so that Qatar/USA/France and Italy can have their cheap oil to sell expensive to the people. “There remains a degree of uncertainty, and there are still regime elements who pose a threat,” he said, speaking from Martha’s Vineyard, Mass, where he is vacationing.



Rebels in Tripoli said they were confident that Gaddafi was still in the capital, and they erected checkpoints around the city to ensure he did not abscond. “We are winning. It is safe,” said rebel fighter Abdel Azouz, as the sound of explosions and gunfire echoed down the telephone line. “There are just a few dirty rats here and there who don’t want to give up.” With that he no doubt pointed to the dirty rats that started the conflict, the rebels.



On Monday, the head of the Transitional National Council, a temporary governing body for the opposition based in this eastern city, declared that “the era of Gaddafi is over,” after rebels swiftly advanced into Tripoli. “We aim for peace, justice and a nation of law,” said council leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil. One of his many names he uses. This man is already known in the Arab world as a liar and a fantast, but is hailed by the Western world as the new dawn of Libya; his pockets full with dollars and pounds may have something to do with it. That was just what Libya did need a traitor and once a traitor, always a traitor as the saying goes. They just want power and their pockets full with US dollars and British Pounds, about the people of Libya they do not give two pence, they just want the power and the US/UK have promised to give it to them in exchange of the oil. The profit will not go to the Libyan people but to the USA, while under Gaddafi the profit went to the country, which had therefore the highest form of income and this as an example more mobile phone per head of the population then Britain. Now they have nothing. The only reason that this all did happen was the plan from the Libyan government to keep the oil profits for the Libyan people, and that was something that the UK and the USA would not allow.



The silly people of the US and the UK, the so-called senators and the MP's will come out with statements as that Gaddafi wanted to kill the whole of the population, therewith showing that the as Senators and MP's are prepared to lie threw their teeth. On MP in the UK by the name of Paisley even went so far to say that it now all over and that the people should go back to work. Stupid of just blatant ignorant, the whole of the Libyan infra structure is destroyed by more then twenty thousand attacks on an army of Libya that was so small that 10 sorties would have been enough to wipe out the whole Libyan army. It was not the army they were after, they were after the total destruction so that the US/UK and France would be able to move in under the heading of restoring the infra structure. In reality to steal the oil and any other wealth they can put their hands on. They want to make from Libya an oil colony with the Libyan people as low paid slaves to do the dirty work while the Western companies and their staff are earning millions. They done this in Iraq, were the people is now so poor that a normal way of living is impossible, and therefore the fighting, the in-fighting will go on, just it will in Libya, till an new leader stands up and throws of the curse of the colonial powers of the West.
The population of Libya are now so poor now they are fallen from the top earners of African countries to the lowest earnest of the African countries, that they will be grateful for the Western help. This till a certain time into the future.



What does it all means is this. The USA and Britain have shown with their illegal attacks on Iraq/Afghanistan and Libya plus their intended attack on Syria that they will use NATO just as the Romans had their Legions, as their attack force and the UN as their Blanco permission sheet to attack any country they see fit under absurd scale of excuses. As we have seen in Libya, it was the British special forces to instigate the death and slaughter in Libya, and they will do this any where in the world were the USA tells them to go. Big countries such as India/China and Russia may be thinking that they are safe well they are not. British imperialism in well alive and kicking and two first ministers of Britain, Blair and Cameron have shown that they do everything for a handful of dollars, even impoverishing their own people. It took twenty years before Germanys Hitler was brought to heel, man can wonder how long it will take for his successor in Britain. Till then he will be the reason for many more deaths and destructions and streams of blood of people in foreign countries as well in Britain.



Just as in Hitler’s Germany the people did not heed the warnings and supported Hitler till it was to late, will the UK/US population wake up in time, maybe!
The old Greece did already set it; the Romans did it the middle age Europe did it. The USA does it, Britain does it. Food and Games keeps the people happy.
Problem is that in the US and in Britain food is running out, prices rising to fast, people are starving, riots starts. The new football season plus the coming Olympic Games maybe will give some respite for the dictator of Britain, but of it will last is just a question that time will answer. Till that time thousands will be dying for not legal reason, many will be imprisoned for no legal reason; many will be impoverished for no legal reason. And that all for an handful of dollars or as the case is and can be seen by Blair the former first minister, lies fills the pockets with millions.


26-08-2011
The SAS and CIA working hand in hand to collect documents from foreign countries missions which are abandened under pressure of the speacial guided Western fighting group. They act like a well trained army group, they look like Western soldiers and the behave like Western soldiers even in their Libyan immitated outfits. One of thos groups calling themselves Libyan rebels although they only spoke English did attack the Venezuelan embassy and compound in Tripoli although the media was told not to report it as such and therefor it went largely unreported, though fatalities were narrowly averted as Venezuelan ambassador Afif Tajeldine and the embassy staff moved to a safer location at the last moment and left Libya shortly thereafter. It transpired in the wake of the incident that Venezuela’s embassy was the only one looted in the whole neighborhood, meaning that the attack which, according to eyewitness accounts, was guided by individuals of Western appearance and military posture, specifically targeted the country’s mission no doubt in the hope to find document what could be used against the Venezuala government.



Venezuelan deputy foreign minister and permanent envoy to the UN Jorge Valero Briceño condemned the attack in the UN Security Council. In the meantime, Latin American commentators read the rebel hit against the Venezuelan diplomatic mission in Tripoli as a message to Chavez supposed to threaten him with being next blacklisted leader after the ousted Gadhafi. It is widely expected that the approach the Empire put to work to destabilize Libya and Syria will in the foreseeable future be employed in Venezuela… Reuters mentioned the plan on August 17, saying that “Political violence in Venezuela threatens to undermine the outcome of next year’s election whether President Hugo Chavez wins a new six-year term or not”. Outbreaks of protests in Venezuela will be backed by vocal media campaigns launched by BBC, Euronews, CNN, Fox, Al Jazeera, etc. and will likely be paralleled by acts of vandalism and street killings perpetrated by terrorist groups which will sneak into Venezuela from other countries. On the whole, what Venezuela will face is an upgraded color revolution brand involving a stronger than ever component of armed violence. The Pentagon, the US intelligence community, the US Department of State, and the corresponding agencies of Great Britain, Spain, Israel, Canada, and others certainly have the task of preventing the re-election of Chavez in 2012 written into their agendas…



Aware of the coming crush test, Chavez, a tough politics veteran, not only shows full confidence ahead of the polls on the horizon but even pledges to stake yet another re-election bid in 2018. His program is practical in character and is spelled out with utmost clarity. Reliance on popular support and a loyal army should help neutralize whatever conspiracies, and the Empire’s dominance will not last indefinitely. Chavez’s optimism is based on the realization that the US in its current imperial shape is doomed, as by the middle of the XXI century recurrent economic crises and domestic strife between political factions, ethnic groups, and corporate giants will irreversibly erode its might. Step by step, at the cost of bloodshed and human sufferings, the US will have to shed the role of the world gendarme and global parasite. Foreign-policy escapades and attempts to bulldoze defiant regimes which will continue to proliferate only bring closer the era of the US agony. Chavez is convinced that the demise of the Empire will put the final dot in the long search of solutions for the historically doomed imperialist system.



The Venezuelan leader speaks frequently of the escalation of socioeconomic tensions in the US and other Western countries. Though in the West the ills tend to stay unrecognized and protests of the disadvantaged social strata, including much of the middle class, are being suppressed, keeping the lid on the situation is increasingly a challenge that administrations cannot handle by traditional repressive means. As a result, plans pop up to use countries’ armed forces against their own populations, and armies are already being trained accordingly. The “wars on terror” in which the US armed forces routinely confronted civilians deformed the mentality of the US officers corps to the point where they seem to have lost all inhibitions about such missions as wiping out domestic conspiracies allegedly waged by Muslim extremists, populist leaders, the reds, the anti-systemic underground, etc.



The militarization of the US has reached such proportions that switching the country’s economy to a more civilian mode promises great pains. As of today, even minimal defense budget cuts would derail the US economy as a whole, while keeping the bloated military-industrial complex afloat takes armed hostilities in various parts of the world. With the US constituencies wary of having to deal with conflicts in Syria, Iran, the Caucasus or elsewhere, only a drama comparable to September 11 can revive the population’s militancy. Chavez believes firmly that the September 11 terrorist attack was masterminded by the US and Israeli intelligence communities. Knowing that the elites of the CIA, the US Defense Intelligence Agency, other Western intelligence services, and the Mossad are working against Venezuela, he frequently revisits the theme and urges Venezuelan TV channels to air programs warning about likely provocations meant to undermine the Bolivarian regime.



The aggressive convulsions of the Empire, its disregard for the international law, the swings in Washington’s decision-making and policies, and the US tendency to connect with renegade groups in the countries defying US control prompt defensive reactions across the globe and lead nations staying outside of the US orbit to reinforce their sovereignty. The rise of regional centers of power will be gaining momentum as a result, and even the countries under various pretexts routed by NATO will gradually see anti-American forces prevail in domestic politics. In the world of today, any aggression invariably meets with resistance.

Since the failed 2002-2003 US attempts to induce regime change in Venezuela, it has been Chavez’s strategy to insulate the country’s army and economy, particularly the energy sector, from the US influence. Confrontation for its own sake cannot be Chavez’s intention considering the obvious disparity between the US and Venezuela, but the latter has to diversify its international relations and seek viable alternatives to the status it had in the pre-Chavez epoch when the country used to be the Empire’s associated state “freely” consenting to exist as another Puerto Rico. At that time, the Venezuelan upper class was americanized to the extent of contemplating the country’s full integration into the US. Dumping oil to the global market at ridiculous prices and enjoying the full range of comforts available to the Golden Billion was the dream of the liberals who were dislodged by the Venezuelan revolution to become Chavez’s main foes. These are the people slamming Chavez over every step meant to strengthen Venezuela’s independence. For them, the nationalization of the oil sector, the country’s deepening engagement with Russia and China, the creation of the populist ALBA bloc, and the cultivation of ties with Brazil, which has grown into Latin America’s economic powerhouse, are unacceptable as measures killing the opposition’s chances for a comeback.



Washington was visibly angered by Chavez’s recent decision to deploy a part of the currency holdings of Venezuela in BRICS countries, including Russia, and to recall the Venezuelan overseas gold reserves. Chavez said that, as the US and European economies are sinking, the time has come to tap into the potentials of such countries as China, Russia, and Brazil and described pulling the holdings out of the US and Europe as “a healthy measure” for Venezuela “on the eve of the capitalist crisis”. No doubt, the strategy behind the transfer of assets from Western banks is not limited to the above regards – the de facto confiscation of Libya’s reserves known as “Gadhafi’s gold” must have also been taken into account in Venezuela. The Venezuelan government has reasons to believe that under certain circumstances the country’s holdings in the West may face a freeze, for example, under the pretext that Western companies would press compensation claims related to nationalizations in Venezuela. The repatriation of gold reserves should also help Venezuela sustain economic buoyancy if the dollar and Euro suffer a sharp depreciation.


Chavez advises other Latin American countries which keep around $570b in the banks of the north, thus investing in its development, to follow the lead. The Bank of England which since 1980 has stored 99 tons of Venezuela’s gold was the first to receive a recall request. The gold from US, Canadian, Swiss, and French banks will similarly be transferred to Venezuela. At the moment, slightly under 58% of Venezuela’s gold reserves totaling 365 tons are stored outside of the country. ALBA countries seem receptive to Chavez’s call for holdings repatriation. It should be noted as well that, visiting Caracas in August, 2011, Russian diplomacy chief S. Lavrov indicated that Moscow would readily consider Venezuela’s offer to host its holdings, thus de facto expressing support for the course Chavez was steering. Beijing’s reaction was essentially the same as Moscow’s.



Analysts regard Chavez’s push for a Latin American financial architecture independent from the West as a risky pursuit. Gaddafi’s plan to reload the impressive currency holdings owned by Libya from Western banks to those of China were among the reasons why he became the target of manhunt the other was that he wanted to keep the profit from the oil/gas revenues for the people in Libya. It is clear that the West will not forget how Chavez dispelled the myth about the economic recovery in the US and Europe. The Venezuelan leader’s radical message that the US and European economies are sinking surely resonated with those who are able to listen


28-08-2011
We have here the situation that two countries constant and this means daily, threatening one other country that they will attack them if they do not do what those two other countries want. It is a little the situation of two school bullies who intimidating another school boy in pressuring him to give them his valuables. It is not the schoolboy valuables those two are after.



Those two the Americans and Britain, yes we know who else, want the valuables from every Middle East country regardless. They are now in dire financial problems so what better way to get the attention away from their own failings then to create wars undere the hreading of restoring democracy. In reallity just for the of oil and gas. Problem is for many years that Iran doesn’t want to play ball. They want to produce and sell their valuables themselves and keep the price they getting for that.



It is here that the Americans and Israel are getting nasty and have started years ago already with daily threats against Iran. The Iranian President responded that because of the fascist way Israel turns against his neighbours by way of murder, rape and overfull jails that this Israel should be wiped of the map. When Saddam of Iraq did similar things to the population, Israel and the Americans were very fast to invade and to kill off the infra-structure of Iraq and they have made it now a successful third world country from being one of the most advanced countries. The Americans have now free use of the oil and gas from Iraq for which they pay a token amount back to Iraq.



Countries under attack and still occupied by the US/UK it self cannot say anything, because, while the president of the Americans triumphantly announced the American combat troops have now left for example Iraq, all 3500 thousand of them. He did forgot to mention, after all re-election is coming, that this was only 7 percent of the troops in Iraq the other 50000 soldiers are still there as teachers for the Iraqi army and police. Read to control the Iraqi army and the police. The only part they do not control is the private army of the first minister’s office. It is for the above reason Iraq has to tolerate that their valuables in the form of oil and gas are practically given away with huge profits for the Americans. They have done now almost the same with Libya, were no ground troops will be supplied. The fact that they are there already is simple ignored, and that they as a measure of stability will be enlarged soon is rather obvious. Those troops from the USA and the UK will be there to train and educated the police and army, read to control the country!


Now, that is what they want in Syria. The problem here is that all was ready to move in the same way as they had done in Libya, an UN resolution to protect the civilians, civilians who will be killed by the thousands as we have seen in Libya by NATO. That is however a farce, the main reason for NATO was to destroy the country so that it needed help and re-building so that the financial situation of the rich in the US/UK will get richer while the poorer people pay.



NATO is very selective, so do they see the smallest truck as Gaddafi's army, but fail to notice almost on the out skirts of that 50 odd army trucks carrying soldiers passed through to the South. Killing the Gaddi army at the most gruwel way, torture and burning of the bodies, which then duly are reported as being done by the passing Gaddafi army, in trucks that NATO failed to notice. They did notice, butr as they were rebel mercenaries they let them pass. And so will every killing, every murder every rape be reported as being done by Gaddafi, and withnesses at gun point will declare that it were Gaddafi troops who done it. Nato will have an perfect excuse, such as a blipp in their equipment etc. It does not cover the fact
that the rebels and the NATO are doing the killings. The Western Media will only with SKY and WP in front declare the governments positions, with no place for truth or reality.



Now they want the same in Syria. However for some reason the bribery and the threats made to China and Russia did not work this time, and going in any way would have made it to obvious for the world that oil was the reason and colonization the game. The same problem is with Iran it is much larger and has a presumed larger army and more up to date than Saddam's army, a man who was installed and promoted by the Americans till the moment he started to think for himself. Israel therefore created the nuclear weapons intended by Iran, they had no proof, Iran denies it, but Israel said so and that is for the Americans enough. They could not use the WMD as they had used that fantasy already in Iraq, so they created a new one based on the efforts of Iran to switch the country over from gas and oil to nuclear fuel.


You have to know the way the Israeli are thinking, doing themselves every nasty trick in the book and many more they invented themselves, they attribute that others are the same as them. Problem here is that most of the countries in the world are more civilized then Israel what is in effect a terrorist warlord state, so poor that their own children have no food enough to eat. Israel’s excuse is that this is because they are not 100 percent Jew. We have news for Israel none of the Israelis in Israel is 100% Jew. They are so many times over the last 3000 years slung out of the country, any country that their real permanent stay as a state is less then 200 years including the present Israel. The rest of the time they were either under the heel of other states, in exile in other states or spread over the world.


We bet that the original Jews who wanted in the beginning of the 20th century their own state, now feel sorry if they where still alive that they had put Abram in Canaan to say “I just spoke to God and he told me that this land would be ours forever. We bet they would have wished that it was now somewhere else less complicated with green pastures lots of water and more oil/gas as commodities. That God was not that wise if he made a mistake that obvious or he did not want the good things for the Jews and therefore gave them a dry slice of near dessert to live on. Hardly a God's choices people!


It is that frustration that creates the chip on the Israeli shoulder; they do not believe nor abide to their own religion but are bound by the historical version made 2500 years ago. They should have known even 100 years ago that not one clear thinking person would ever believe that Abram suddenly was confronted with God and was told that the land was his. Not much of a God if he has to steal it from other tribes to give it to a small newcomer tribe, who then left quickly as they found that the land was to dry. Must have been a stand-up comic that God of Abram, first he takes someone else land and give it to Abram, than he makes it so dry that they cannot use it. It is a wonder that some people actual believed that story. We do not mean the Christians. They only used it to make money out of it and history shows that the Popes themselves did not believe much of the story hence they had it re-written over and over again.


They threat Iran on a daily base is it wonder that Iran respond to the terrorist treats from Israel supported by the Americans, Iran warns that if attacked it will respond with a global attack. The Western stories which are made up to put Iran in a bad light are indeed becoming more disturbing and man can really ask themselves are those stories created by mental patience? Pressured by the Jewish-Americans financed and controlled United Nations (UN) and vassals of the Americans who suddenly call themselves world powers they pestering Iran because of its nuclear energy program, the revolutionary government of Iran has put into operation. They showed the world that they have an unmanned long range combat aircraft and told the United States and Israel that it would trigger a global war should they be attacked by another country.


It is not only that Iran could possible have a means to defend themselves, it is obvious that the Americans and Israel hoping that they can create enough third power of well paid Iranians, (well paid by the Americans via the Jewish bankers) to destabilize Iran so far that they can get their hands on the Iranian oil and gas and anything else they can take.


According to Iranian journalists, Iran has a production line of two types of aircraft capable of bombing and reconnaissance. Before showing the Drone, the Iranian defence minister said his country was ready to unveil a project of "great importance" and that Iran's defence capability has reached a point that they do not need any help from other countries.

The Iranian President promised a response "on a planetary scale" if his country is attacked. "Our options have no limits, and will cover the whole planet," said the Iranian president, in response to a question asked by journalists about what would be the reaction from Tehran to an external attack. “I believe that some individuals think about attacking Iran, within the Zionist entity (Israel), but they know that Iran is an indestructible wall and I do not think their masters, the Americans, will allow them to do it," said Ahmadinejad. The president of Iran is wrong in that way of thinking because if it comes to making money from other peoples problems and misery that Israel is the first one to inflict that. They will not wait for an OK from the Americans; it would be doubt full if America is in a position to with held permission to create WW3.


It is Israel’s and the American interest to create such a war as a way to come out the problems they have created themselves. The President of Iran defended the resumption of the initiative of Brazil and Turkey on an exchange of enriched uranium. Iran has put its nuclear power station in operation and says it needs enriched uranium to fuel future power plants and is counting on one day being able to produce 20,000 megawatts of electricity from nuclear sources.


Meanwhile, on instigation of the Israeli and the Americans as war instigators and the largest arm dealers in the world, the rest of the world is told by that dangerous duo that they suspect Iran wants to equip itself with a nuclear bomb, hiding behind its civilian nuclear program, despite their repeated denials. This is based on the fantasies of Israel on one site and the believe that others are just as evil as they are.


The United States and Israel regularly say that they do not exclude a possible attack against Iran to put an end to the in their fantasy controversial nuclear program. That is their normal way of terrorism always has a threat at hand. The main question is, "why should Israel possess nuclear weapons in violation of the international law", "why should Israel occupy the lands which don't belong to it", "why should Israel repeatedly threaten its neighbours and wage wars against them", "why should Holocaust be used as a pretext to suppress the Palestinian nation?", "why should Iran be deprived of the peaceful uses of nuclear power while the United States, Russia, France, United Kingdom and China have thousands of nuclear weapons?"


So why this aggression against Iran, the reason was simple, Iran would not make concessions and thus should be silenced at any cost. The concessions being give us your oil and gas cheap and we leave you in peace. So, who is going to pay the price for silencing Iran? On this there is a simple answer; the answer is written in the history of Israel. They always have demanded things from their neighbours their friends even their family. If the answer was No, then they began a war which they always have lost. The 6 day war they won they will say, but the fact is that they won the battle only, the war is still ongoing and the clear signs are that they once again are going to loose. America or no America, rich Jewish bankers or no rich Jewish bankers, Government supported media or no government supported media, they will loose. However, before that will happen the Israeli with their masters the Americans will stage categorically an all-out psychological operation in which the means of coercion, falsification, distortion, fabrication and intimidation will be used.


If Israel gets his way and manage to attack Iran then the start of WW3 is made, other countries will take sides and it will not be with the Israeli and the Americans. Israel will be able to control their citizens after all Israel is police states were murder is almost as common as in South Africa. In Israel all the ones who murdered are always called terrorists. While the reality shows that they are killed by the IDF the largest terrorist army known. Honesty and compassion are by them unknown words.


Israel’s actions are causing anti Israel feelings all over the world, even in a city such as Amsterdam in the Netherlands were Jews always had a peaceful live, were the Anna Frank story created many of tears, there are now parts were the Jews are scared to go out. Not their fault but the fault of the terrorist regime in Jerusalem, that anger against them will kill innocent people. However in the view of Israel and the Americans that is were innocent people are for, to kill them. Israel and the Americans both hold that record for the most killed innocent people in peace time.
And if they have their way, special with Germany supporting them, then the killing has only just started.

30-08-2011
Not so long ago during a lecture I was asked if I could explain where the Inui and the Eskimo’s had come from. The lecture was that day about the existence of the North American Indians and their reaction to the first sighted Eskimo’s.


As the lecture was almost ended I promised a written answer to the student that had asked a relevant question. I turned out that the question was mending to be a trick question as the asking student explained, there were no Eskimos. What we call Eskimos he said were in fact the Inuit he said.


This is a well documented mistake, not all Eskimos, a name given by the first Europeans who arrived in the north of Canada. Here we have to take the word from, as example from Nansen on his investigations to the north of Greenland. How further the Europeans moved north to more indications they found from people who had lived there before long time past. The Inuit call them Tuniit, the tall people, the giants. And they were not the only giants roaming the earth before time was able to preserve details. They were replaced, and displaced by the Dorset culture who in turn where replaced and displaced by the Thule culture which was emerging from western Alaska.


So where did those people come from, and more important why were they living in the freezing cold. The Eskimo must have livid within those ice limits, and developed themselves in what they are now, this over many thousands of years.


It will be obvious that they had migrated via the land connection, between Asia and America, and then via the trail from what is now Russia to Greenland and that from there they slowly have spread out over the frozen islands of north Alaska and Canada. Some tribes are still in language and appearance near to the northern North American Indians, others have more the features of the Chinese.


However, we have found that the coasts near the polar orifice on the inner side of the north of Greenland would afford the ideal conditions for the earliest habitat of the Eskimo race, sea-fishing on a coast that was connected with milder coasts further south; we must expect that the Eskimo culture began on coasts with similar conditions. There are other facts which make it certain that the Eskimo race as we know it today is an overflow from settlements on the borders of the polar orifice. It is able to show that that uninhabited part of that world has been visited by Eskimos or similar people coming through the ice covered borders from Asia, via Alaska to Greenland.


It is a fact that when the first Europeans arrived in Greenland the Norseman found no Eskimos in the beginning, groups wise they came from the north of Greenland. It was obvious that they had lived far apart from other people for a long time, and that could be only possible if they were living so far north that no contact was made. It is also known out of Nansen that it was the hordes of Eskimos coming from the North that put an end to the Western and Eastern settlements of the Norseman. We have to read not too much in the word “hordes” as the way of life would not make that possible. Their means of transport is a small boat a Kayak and the female boat when in open water and the dog sledges in the winter.


However this does not explains where they came from original, many people have an legend in their history which point to an land beyond where the Sun always shone and the weather was always summer, the Eskimos had that legend but so have the Irish. Fact is that how further north the investigator goes how more extreme older sites are found, even in the extreme north.


The present Eskimos are different as the ones who came from the north 1000 years ago, Norseman left stranded on Greenland mixed with the Eskimos and the alteration is obvious.


This all still does not explain where they came from originally. Therefore we have to go to the Asian side of the landmass. The original Eskimos have similar features as the Chinese had and therefore we are be able to connect the “land where the sun always shone”. The Sunda shelf.


In the early time the Sunda shelf was still a minimum of 50 meters above the sea, it connected Australia with New Guinea and Indonesia. In fact it was possible to walk simple from lower Asia even Australia to the North of Greenland. The evaporated ice time in progress made the warmest part of the Sunda shelf being covered first by the rising water of the melted ice, and the people of the Sunda lands fled towards the higher parts of the Sunda shelf, took to the boats or attempted to find new land to live. The mass of land submerging under water was enormous, Australia was separated from the North connections what is New Guinea, which in turn was disconnected from Borneo. At the end of the ice time when all was settled down the shelf it self had come to rest, what were left were the Islands of what is now Indonesia, Madagascar, and Japan. If Hong Kong would have existed in that time it would have been hundreds of miles land inwards, Japan and the Korea's would by one land connected.


The Sunda shelf is twice the size of what we call Indo-China, Malaysia and Indonesia, the Eskimos probably travelled a part of the Sunda shelf, and driven Northwards in groups by the rising water, as the Eskimos themselves said they came from a land of constant sunshine, from a country past the ice fields. This must have been the passing of the Bering street or the still frozen line of later volcanic mountains parallel with the Bering street but more south. It will both explain exactly as where the Eskimos where coming from, but that they left the Sunda shelf is without any doubts escaping the rising water is obvious. The clever ones would have no doubt when the first surge of melting ice water came from the South left for higher grounds, others would have left by the second wave, but many would have died merciless or escaped in boats to end up in Polynesia. The Polynesian islands such as Eastern Island still bears the signs of unexplained statues.


When the end of the ice age was near the high water reacted on the volcanic process and hefty explosions and the cracking of the shelf was it result. Long deep water tsunamis and the volcanic pressure forced the plates to move and when it all was passed and the new form on earth was established new people had arrived everywhere. Polynesia, the Americas and Australia they had new people. But so had the North America's and Greenland.


New cultures and new way where formed and adapted, they left behind well buried under water for the last 10 to 4 thousand years, leaving behind art works and buildings not seen after that and made by people far advanced as the later people. The evolutionist seems to have a new change to widen their view when adequate under water equipment is produced to allow them to under water for the next step in the search of how it all began.


For the Eskimo all weight of evidence is pointing the same way. The long way from the Sunda shelf, regardless of what place to the north of Greenland. We do not know what did stop them from coming further south, other people, tribes, danger? But by then they were a long way off from the Land of Sunshine, the land of the Tuniit, the tall people, the giants, Sunda.


Only in many years to come the archaeologist, the evolutionist, the marine biologists can and will give us more information, maybe not in our life time but for future generations, they will know what did happen when the ice time did happen, the shelf’s moved, and the mountains were formed till that time we have to do with what we know now, what we think could have happen and what we expect did happen. As said before future will tell the past.















Text-only version of this page | Edit this page | Manage website | Website design: 2-minute-website.com




















.
.